News: 1666100706

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Moon has been drifting away from Earth for 2.4 billion years, rocks reveal

(2022/10/18)


An analysis of Australian sedimentary rock has helped to show the Moon was about 60,000km closer to the Earth 2.46 billion years ago than it is now.

The current distance from the Earth to the Moon is around 384,400km (238,855 miles), but scientists have known for some time that it is drifting away. One of the scientific contributions of NASA's 1969 Apollo mission was to leave [1]mirrors on the natural rocky satellite . The subsequent Lunar Laser Ranging experiment showed the Moon inches away from its [2]home planet by 3.8cm (1.5 inches) every year .

The finding has presented scientists with something of a puzzle.

[3]

Extrapolating backwards, [4]it suggests the Moon was in touching distance of the Earth around 1.5 billion years ago , whereas we know the Earth is about 4.5 billion years old from a bunch of other evidence and there's no evidence of a collision between the Moon and the Earth.

[5]

[6]

But the rate at which the Moon is sliding off into the firmament is not constant. Scientists have been trying to figure out how the rate changes, and how close the Moon and Earth once were by analysing evidence from rocks on our home planet.

Joshua Davies, Sussex University research fellow, and a post-doctoral researcher in geoscience at Utrecht University, Margriet Lantink, developed the technique to try to uncover details of the solar system's distant past. The focus of their study was sedimentary layers in Karijini National Park in western Australia, some of which reveal the oldest visible sections of the Earth's crust.

[7]

[8]Sharing these ideas , Lantink and Davies explained how banded iron formations, formed on the ancient ocean floor, help determine the cycles of the Earth’s precession, the wobble in the Earth's axis related to its interaction with the Moon.

Since 1972, scientists have been working on the idea that ancient rock layers relate variations in climate induced by the so-called [9]Milankovitch cycles , the effects of the Earth’s movement on climate. These cycles are linked to extreme cold and hot climate, which can affect the size of oceans and lakes, the kind of flora that grow and influence the evolution and migration of flora. They can also be linked to patterns in sedimentary rock.

[10]NASA's Lucy probe dodges space traffic around Earth in gravity-assist flyby

[11]Collapsed Arecibo telescope to be replaced by school

[12]Junk cellphones on Earth would stack higher than the International Space Station

[13]NASA sets November date for next SLS Moon rocket delay, er, launch

One of the Milankovitch cycles — the climatic precession cycle, which has to do with how the orientation of the Earth's spin axis "wobbles" over time – is directly related to the distance between the Earth and the Moon, say the authors. The current cycle has a duration of ~21,000 years, but "this period would have been shorter in the past when the Moon was closer to Earth," write the boffins.

Looking at evidence from the layers in the Australian rock, and confirming with evidence from similar formations in South Africa, the researchers show a 11,000-year cycle observed in the rocks is likely related to the climatic precession cycle, having a much shorter period than the current cycle.

They then worked backwards to show the precession signal reflected a distance between the Earth and the Moon 2.46 billion years ago.

[14]

Their study, [15]written up in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, concludes the Moon was around 321,800km (± 6,500km) from the Earth 2.46 billion years ago. That's around 62,000km closer to the Earth than it is now (the current position is 384,300km away) — or 1.5 times the circumference of Earth. The finding also suggests the length of the day on Earth was 17 hours at the time. The researchers are now looking for more rocks which could help uncover the past of the Earth-Moon dynamics.

"We now need other reliable data and new modeling approaches to trace the evolution of the Moon through time. And our research team has already begun the hunt for the next suite of rocks that can help us uncover more clues about the history of the solar system," they write. ®

Get our [16]Tech Resources



[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment

[2] https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/ApolloLaser.html

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Y07Nl6L03C7V3grKRJ3YmAAAAEI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.nature.com/articles/320600a0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y07Nl6L03C7V3grKRJ3YmAAAAEI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y07Nl6L03C7V3grKRJ3YmAAAAEI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Y07Nl6L03C7V3grKRJ3YmAAAAEI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://phys.org/news/2022-10-moon-slowly-drifting-earth-billion.html

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milankovitch_cycles

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/17/nasas_lucy_spacecraft_successfully_dodged/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/17/arecibo_telescope_education_center/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/14/international_e_waste_day/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/10/12/nasa_sls_november_date/

[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Y07Nl6L03C7V3grKRJ3YmAAAAEI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[15] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36161904/

[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



This must be incredibly difficult

Pascal Monett

We know that the Moon used to be closer. Thanks to the Apollo missions, we can now measure distance reliably, but that does not say anything about the past.

Finding out what was the situation millions of years ago without a time machine is going to require a lot of expertise and correlation.

This is Science at its best. Kudos to all involved.

Re: This must be incredibly difficult

Charlie Clark

We do have some historical data from ancient astronomers. This correlates with current observations but, astronomically speaking, is a mere blink of an eye away.

We know that, in the past, there were some [1]Violent Unknown Cosmological Events in the solar system that threw lots of things around. But we can only guess what, where and when.

[1] https://youtu.be/zf4GHp61qdg

Re: This must be incredibly difficult

Version 1.0

When you look at all the events that our planet has seen since it was created, then it suggests that we have been very lucky to still be here - and so it might explain why we see virtually nothing when we look around the universe for other intelligent life-forms. Evolving life as a planet starts to grow older seems to be fairly reasonably easy given a few billion years ... but all this evidence suggests that surviving life on a planet is probably a lot less common. We have been very fortunate!

Ha! Read about that in the early 1970s

Will Godfrey

Seems world + dog forgot about it.

I wrote a sci-fi story based on that, titled "The Moon Thieves". Sadly long since lost.

Moon drifting?

chivo243

'Inherit the Moon' It was the first book in the Giant's series by James P. Hogan. Somehow I've lost that book, has a lot of things wrong about the near future, but is a good story.

Anonymous Coward

quiet quitting ftw

Is it...

Anonymous Coward

trying to get away from the Tories?

Re: Is it...

Phil O'Sophical

Selenexit?

The moon's Australian!

xyz

Who knew

I have sacrificed time, health, and fortune, in the desire to complete these
Calculating Engines. I have also declined several offers of great personal
advantage to myself. But, notwithstanding the sacrifice of these advantages
for the purpose of maturing an engine of almost intellectual power, and after
expending from my own private fortune a larger sum than the government of
England has spent on that machine, the execution of which it only commenced,
I have received neither an acknowledgement of my labors, not even the offer
of those honors or rewards which are allowed to fall within the reach of men
who devote themselves to purely scientific investigations...

If the work upon which I have bestowed so much time and thought were a mere
triumph over mechanical difficulties, or simply curious, or if the execution
of such engines were of doubtful practicability or utility, some justification
might be found for the course which has been taken; but I venture to assert
that no mathematician who has a reputation to lose will ever publicly express
an opinion that such a machine would be useless if made, and that no man
distinguished as a civil engineer will venture to declare the construction of
such machinery impracticable...

And at a period when the progress of physical science is obstructed by that
exhausting intellectual and manual labor, indispensable for its advancement,
which it is the object of the Analytical Engine to relieve, I think the
application of machinery in aid of the most complicated and abtruse
calculations can no longer be deemed unworthy of the attention of the country.
In fact, there is no reason why mental as well as bodily labor should not
be economized by the aid of machinery.
-- Charles Babbage, Passage from the Life of a Philosopher