Wind, solar fulfill 10% of global electricity demand for first time
- Reference: 1664472612
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/09/29/wind_solar_power_electricity_record/
- Source link:
The 2022 [1]Power Transition Trends report by Bloomberg New Energy Fund (BNEF) found that power generation emissions in general leapt up in 2021 as the global economy rebounded from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Much of that new power generation came from renewable sources, with wind and solar accounting for three quarters of capacity added in 2021. When accounting for hydro, nuclear, and other zero-carbon power sources, that number rises to 85 percent of 2021's new capacity.
[2]
Those gains were spoiled by a resurgence in coal-fired power plants, use of which BNEF said was up by a record 8.5 percent between 2020 and 2021. BNEF cites rapidly rebounding energy demand (which rose 5.6 percent year-on-year in 2021), reduced hydro generation due to droughts, and high natural gas prices in Europe as primary drivers of the coal surge.
[3]
[4]
"New spikes in coal generation are a troubling sign for the economy, our health, and the fight against climate change. This report should be a rallying cry to leaders around the world that the transition to clean energy requires bigger and bolder actions," said Michael Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP, Bloomberg Philanthropies, and the UN Secretary General's special envoy for climate ambition and solutions.
Raking climate change solutions over the coals
For the first time since 2013, BNEF said in [5]the report (PDF), "coal-fired power plants were the top contributor to top-line power generation growth." The report said that coal accounted for the majority of additional generation in 2021 – not to be confused with newly added generation, of which coal was a small component.
[6]California to phase out gas furnaces, water heaters by 2030
[7]Amazon adds 2.7 gigawatts of renewable energy to its operations
[8]Emissions-slashing hybrid trains to hit tracks in Europe
[9]California to try tackling drought with canal-top solar panels
Still, coal continues to occupy the largest single share of global electricity generation at 27 percent, and it may continue to rise in 2022 "as European nations seek short-term solutions to compensate for droughts and extremely high gas prices," BNEF said.
While European coal plants might be earning the blame, they aren't responsible for most of the coal generation, BNEF said. That honor belongs to three countries that account for 63 percent of burned coal: China, India, and the United States.
China holds the crown for coal-fired power generation, accounting for 52 percent of total coal usage in the world. India accounts for 11 percent of coal, while the US burns approximately 9 percent. The US could see itself slip out of the top three, however, as BNEF said it's the only country in the top 10 coal burners to reduce its coal generation since the beginning of the decade.
[10]
The remaining seven top coal-burning countries (Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, South Africa, Germany, Russia, and Australia), in addition to the top three, are responsible for 87 percent of coal-generated power.
Net capacity being added to power grids around the world is dominated by renewables, and fossil fuels continue to decline, BNEF said. It added that natural gas was leading the way in new fossil fuel power generation, but that could be in peril, too.
As BNEF noted, natural gas supplies have been imperiled by Russia's war with Ukraine. With the [11]potential sabotage this week of a gas pipeline between Russia and Europe, coal could gain even more sway on the continent. In Germany alone, 3.2GW of coal-fired capacity has been reactivated, and BNEF said it expects Germany to add another 5.5GW of additional coal capacity by the end of the year.
[12]
"Other European countries are expected to follow similar paths," BNEF said. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://about.bnef.com/blog/wind-and-solar-top-10-of-global-power-generation-for-first-time/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YzYVex0h-txIstMevvBWPQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YzYVex0h-txIstMevvBWPQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YzYVex0h-txIstMevvBWPQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/BNEF-Power-Transition-Trends-2022_FINAL.pdf
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/26/california_to_phase_out_gas/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/21/amazon_27gw_renewable_energy/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/09/21/hitachi_hybrid_trains/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/31/california_solar_power_canals/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YzYVex0h-txIstMevvBWPQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/mystery-gas-leaks-hit-major-russian-undersea-gas-pipelines-europe-2022-09-27/
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YzYVex0h-txIstMevvBWPQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: "clean" solar energy is genuine greenwash.
Easy to find some number for that: 46 vs 164g/kWh
Total life cycle GHG emissions from solar PV systems are similar to other renewables and nuclear energy, and much lower than coal.
https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/56487.pdf
It is true to point out however than renewables are front loaded: most of the emissions happen today, not over the lifetime.
It is reasonable to expect solar to improve by a factor of 2 over time, while coal won't.
(My mate just added new panels and they are ~30% lighter/W than those installed 6 years ago)
:(
Title says "energy", article says "electricity".
Add gas boilers, most cars, diesel HGVs, blast furnaces, oil-powered ships, aircraft, barbeques and birthday cakes etc. - wind and solar still contribute a pathetic amount to the "global energy demand"
Just the headline - now fixed
The article's fine - it's about electricity, as the first sentence makes clear. This got truncated down to energy for a shorter headline, and has now been corrected.
Don't forget to email corrections@ if you spot something wrong, ta.
C.
Re: Just the headline - now fixed
Thanks for the fix :)
Sadly too many press articles confuse power/energy with electricity (and kWh with kW etc.) - at least El Reg try to keep things on track ;)
"China holds the crown for coal-fired power generation, accounting for 52 percent of total coal usage in the world"
And they are *increasing* it by ~100 new power stations per month. But of course global warming is caused by westeners driving to work by their cars.
That's how propaganda works: Small lies aren't believable, you have to have *big lies*.
Göbbels knew what he was talking about and every propaganda organization nowadays are imitating him.
"China holds the crown for coal-fired power generation".
So lets do nothing!.
It's a problem yes, but they still produce less pollution per capita than we do in the USA and Europe and they will have about 20 new nuclear power plants within 10 years, probably more.
They should do more but so should we.
It's just a bit too simple to say - look at the Chinese, and do nothing.
But there is, of course, Boris who will/would build one a year in Britain apart from all the hospitals.
https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx
Until China has greater CO2/capita than a comparable moderate western country, you don't have much of a point really.
Also much Chinese energy is probably going into outsourced industrial emissons for the west.
Certainly here in NZ we have no plan at all to reduce total emissions, and simply intend to close our steel, refinery (done) and cement works and ship all industrial emissions offshore and stick our fingers in our ears and go la-la-la-la
"With the potential sabotage this week of a gas pipeline between Russia and Europe, coal could gain even more sway on the continent. I"
None of those pipelines have transported gas at least a month. Also green fanatics are vehemently against burning coal. Of course, they are all paid by power companies who managed to raise price of electricity, first 50% in August and again, this time 200%, in October.
While production costs haven't really changed much, if at all. It's *all profit*. Then EU decided that no windfall tax either. Throughly bribed bastards.
Bufton Tuftons
Tufton St. aficionados posting in 3 ... 2 ...
Heh, I was just looking at a fun overview before reading the article.
Apparently we're at some 70% electricity coming from wind...
A live view can be seen here https://energinet.dk/energisystem_fullscreen
"clean" solar energy is genuine greenwash.
How many kilos of coal is burned for each solar cell existing? 500 kilos? More? Almost all of them are made in China and coal is the primary/only source of energy in China.
So lifetime emissions for each panel are literally in tons of CO2 -class. Which conviniently doesn't exist in *any* energy efficiency calculations. That's not an accident, but propaganda.
It would be a shame for wood stove to beat solar cell in cleanliness, wouldn't it?