News: 1663769708

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

'I Don't Care About Cookies' extension sold to Avast

(2022/09/21)


The lone developer of anti-cookie-warning browser add-on "I Don't Care About Cookies" has sold it to Avast, resulting in both concern – and new forks.

Web users the world over have been suffering under the well-intentioned but ill-advised EU cookie law [1]for a decade now . As a result, websites pester with warnings to get us to consent to cookies, and if you don't consent, they have no way to record that fact and so pester you every visit.

Enter [2]I don't care about cookies , a handy browser extension by Croatian developer Daniel Kladnik. IDCAC, available for pretty much every web browser out there, automatically dismisses cookie warnings. You can tweak its settings if you want, but it automatically accepts the minimal cookies for the site to work.

[3]

We suspect that such blanket acceptance might be a hardcore privacy activist's nightmare, but for many of us it's a small but welcome improvement: on the majority of sites, you never see cookie warnings any more, and a small daily irritation vanishes. Whenever the add-on was updated, it generated a reminder page soliciting donations, but that was a very small inconvenience compared to the one it banished.

[4]

[5]

But no more, because Kladnik has now [6]sold his handiwork. He describes the buyer as "a famous and trustworthy IT company" – antivirus flogger Avast. Located in Prague, a half-hour bike ride from Vulture Towers Central Europe, Avast previously [7]bought its Brno-based neighbor AVG , mere months after this vulture left the latter's employ.

Avast itself is on the verge of [8]being bought by Norton LifeLock , which is the [9]part of Symantec owned by Broadcom . (Veritas, [10]the other part , was [11]sold to the Carlyle Group .)

[12]

If this complex series of acquisitions, spinoffs and mergers leaves you confused, you are not alone. The formerly one-man IDCAC extension will soon be a tiny part of the increasingly sprawling [13]Broadcom empire . Avast itself is [14]no stranger to security concerns , notably its controversial, and [15]now discontinued Jumpshot browser extension .

[16]Sephora to pay $1.2m to settle Cali privacy law claims – and why this is a big deal

[17]'I wonder what this cable does': How to tell thicknet from a thickhead

[18]Google postpones Chrome's third-party cookie bonfire yet again

[19]Tracking cookies found in more than half of G20 government websites

IDCAC is a browser extension, meaning that it's a relatively small Javascript applet. It was [20]already open source, and Dutch developer Guus van der Meer has produced a [21]fork . It looks like [22]others may yet [23]follow it.

Browser cookies are fairly harmless things, and until the law came in, their main relevance to most of us was as something that system-cleanup programs could use to boost their claims about how much clutter they were removing. If it wasn't for the law making warnings so intrusive, we suspect most people wouldn't care.

If Avast continues to offer the extension for free, and you're happy to trust the company, this flurry of attention may prove beneficial – and if you don't, we suspect that free alternatives will probably start appearing in various browsers' extensions stores very soon. ®

Get our [24]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2012/05/26/eprivacy_cookie_compliance_begins/

[2] https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Yys1FRwovgk2@iAY8@COugAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yys1FRwovgk2@iAY8@COugAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Yys1FRwovgk2@iAY8@COugAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.i-dont-care-about-cookies.eu/whats-new/acquisition/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2016/09/30/avast_closes_avg_buyout/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/03/norton_cma/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2019/08/09/broadcom_buys_symantec_for_10bn/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2014/10/09/symantecs_turn_for_splittery/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2015/08/11/symantec_sells_veritas_to_private_equity/

[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yys1FRwovgk2@iAY8@COugAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[13] https://www.theregister.com/Tag/Broadcom/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2020/03/10/avast_mitm_antitrack_bug/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/30/avast_to_close_jumpshot/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/27/sephora_ccpa_privacy_settlement/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/12/on_call/

[18] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/28/google_postpones_thirdparty_cookie_phaseout/

[19] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/06/tracking_cookies_found_in_90/

[20] https://github.com/kiboke

[21] https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Dont-Care-About-Cookies

[22] https://github.com/elgrove/idcac-3.4.2

[23] https://github.com/PolishRoboDogHouse/IDCAC_uo_mirror

[24] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Or

Greybearded old scrote

I use [1]Consent-O-Matic, because I do care. It's not dealing with all of them yet, but it says a clear 'No' to many.

I disagree that cookies are harmless, and remember that it's not just about cookies. It's about all tracking technology.

[1] https://consentomatic.au.dk/

Re: Or

heyrick

The cookies themselves are fairly innocuous. It's what they can be used for that is the privacy nightmare. And thanks to the damned "legitimate interest" (no, advertiser, you have NO such thing), you're pretty much still being tracked regardless.

Be wary of stored and transmitted data

b0llchit

Browser cookies are fairly harmless things...

That is quite an ignorant statement. The cookie text may be harmless, but you must see and analyse it in the proper context instead of making a statement of triviality.

You probably missed the part where cookies are used to track people for the benefit of corps making more money and for governments to trace dissent? You probably also missed the part where cookies are being stolen to hijack sessions and steal stuff?

You should be wary, every time when information flows, be wary.

Hmm

Greybearded old scrote

If the "I Don't Care" users truly don't, why are they worried about the privacy implications of this sale?

greenrd's law
Evey post disparaging someone else's spelling or grammar, or lauding
one's own spelling or grammar, will inevitably contain a spelling or
grammatical error.
-- greenrd in http://www.kuro5hin.org/comments/2002/4/16/61744/5230?pid=5#6