News: 1662695888

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

US seeks standards dominance by letting Huawei access previously forbidden crypto tech

(2022/09/09)


The US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has relaxed restrictions that barred export of some encryption technologies to Huawei, in the name of ensuring America is in a better position to negotiate global standards.

A Thursday [1]announcement [PDF] explains the decision was taken because American businesses have told the Biden administration they’re confused about whether they need to seek a licence before bringing some tech to standards talks. That confusion “undermined U.S. participation and leadership in these activities,” the announcement states.

The Biden administration has a policy of ensuring US entities can achieve administrative and technical leadership of standards forums, a response to Huawei’s many and substantia contributions to 5G standards. The Chinese giant’s efforts are seen as having given it a head start in development of 5G products.

[2]

The US also worries that China, through companies like Huawei, is trying to create standards that benefit authoritarian governments. In 2020, for example, Huawei floated [3]“New IP” that allows central control of networks. China’s government has made contributing to networking standards [4]a priority as part of its nationwide IPv6 adoption plan.

[5]

[6]

China and Huawei argue that their proposed networking standards are needed to ready the internet for future applications. Critics point out that China’s standards are being advanced through the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), not the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) or Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).

It’s widely felt that China is therefore trying to shop for a friendly forum by working through the ITU.

[7]US 'dropped the ball' on security by going it alone claims Huawei US CSO

[8]US govt: Huawei is a national security risk and a menace, except, you know, when we need it for 5G standards work

[9]Big Tech shrank the internet while growing its own power

America wants to ensure it can exert dominance in all standards bodies, and justifies that stance as ensuring the values of liberal democracies and open market are embedded in tech.

Which is why the BIS on Thursday issued new guidance that allows the export of some encryption tech, provided it is only used for standards development activities.

[10]

The tech allowed to leave US shores is described as “low-level”, rather than anything that could represent a national security or commercial risk.

In related news, the ITU meeting at which Huawei will table New IP starts on September 22nd. The Register will observe proceedings with interest. ®

Get our [11]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/documents/about-bis/newsroom/press-releases/3127-2022-09-08-bis-press-release-standards-rule/file

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Yxq6WxDWbHgW5Czd9wDmgAAAAAU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/04/we_have_huawei_to_make/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/26/china_ipv6_plan/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yxq6WxDWbHgW5Czd9wDmgAAAAAU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Yxq6WxDWbHgW5Czd9wDmgAAAAAU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/06/cso_huawei_us/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/16/us_government_huawei_is_a/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/11/internet_has_shrunk/

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yxq6WxDWbHgW5Czd9wDmgAAAAAU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



I thought using loops was cheating so I programmed my own samples. Then I
thought using samples was cheating so I recorded real drums.

I then thought that programming it was cheating so I learnt to play drums for
real. I then thought using bought drums was cheating so I learnt to make my
own.

I then thought that using pre-made skins was cheating so I killed a goat and
skinned it. I then thought that that was cheating too, so I grew my own goat
from a baby goat. I also think that is cheating but I'm not sure where to go
from here. I haven't made any music lately, what with the goat farming and
all.

-- Pagan-za
-- Reddit reply to "Do you ever feel like you're cheating by
using sample packs?" ( https://is.gd/FbsfS6 )