News: 1662494406

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

No, Apple, you may not sell iPhones without chargers

(2022/09/06)


Brazil's government is freezing certain iPhone sales in the country and fining Apple for removing chargers from its smartphones, something officials there have declared a practice harmful to consumers, despite being presented as an act of environmental heroism.

Brazil's Department of Consumer Protection and Defense today [1]published an order fining Apple $2.38 million, as well as suspending the sale of any iPhone 12 or newer or any iPhone model sold without a charger.

Per the translated order, Brazilian officials say Apple's claims of removing the chargers to reduce its environmental footprint are meritless, especially in light of the proportional impact it has on consumers. Brazil's watchdogs aren't impressed that Apple is, in their eyes, shipping devices that are incomplete – as buyers may well need those chargers and they aren't necessarily supplied.

[2]

"There are no elements to consider justified an operation that, declaredly aiming to reduce carbon emissions, entails the insertion in the consumer market of a product whose use depends on the acquisition of another, which is also commercialized by the company," Brazilian officials said in the order.

[3]

[4]

Apple has yet to respond to questions about how it plans to respond to the Brazilian ban.

Suspending sales a last resort

Brazil's order recognizes the relatively small fine is unlikely to affect Apple, which it said has the market power to simply pay it and continue violating the law, or simply ignore it altogether. This is where the sales ban comes in, which the order states is not precautionary, but final pending wider regulatory approval.

Additionally, the regulators behind the order say they plan to pass their findings along to other Brazilian government ministries "for evaluation of other judicial measures suitable for the cessation or reparation" of Apple's now-illicitly packaged devices.

[5]US must adopt USB-C charging standard like EU, senators urge

[6]Tough news for Apple as EU makes USB-C common charging port for most electronic devices

[7]One-size-fits-all chargers? What a great idea! Of course Apple would hate it

[8]iPhone XR caught fire after getting trapped in airline passenger's seat

Apple removed chargers from its iPhones [9]in 2020 , with the company [10]officially citing its environmental goals as the reason for the change. As of now, iPhones only ship with a USB-C to Lightning cable, while USB-C chargers can only be obtained with iPad or Mac devices.

Older USB-A chargers with compatible cables will still charge newer iPhones, but often much slower due to lower wattage requirements in older iPhone chargers.

The EU decided earlier this year to force all smartphone manufacturers to conform to a single [11]USB-C charging standard , which will require Apple to move away from the Lightning cable - at least in Europe - by 2024, which Apple [12]is rumored to be planning for its 2023 iPhones.

[13]

Officials in the US have [14]urged the adoption of a similar charging standard, which would largely affect iPhones: Most everything else, even Apple's other hardware, has already moved along. ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/despacho-n-2.343/2022-427275225

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YxfC9hDWbHgW5Czd9wARGwAAAAo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YxfC9hDWbHgW5Czd9wARGwAAAAo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YxfC9hDWbHgW5Czd9wARGwAAAAo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/17/usb_us_senate/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/07/eu_usb_c_common_charger/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/23/eu_one_charger_plan/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/20/iphone_xr_inflight_fire_british_airways/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/29/apple_reportedly_plans_to_remove/

[10] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210133

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/07/eu_usb_c_common_charger/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/12/apple_lightning_usbc/

[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YxfC9hDWbHgW5Czd9wARGwAAAAo&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/17/usb_us_senate/

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



cornetman

Running the original order through Google translate, it seems that their specific beef with Apple is that not including the charger results in a product that is "incomplete" and therefore not functional. I guess I understand their point, they also go on to state that it is not demonstrated that there is an environment benefit by said non-inclusion which seems a bit bizarre and trivially easy to substantiate. If just one customer doesn't buy an additional charger because they already have one, then I guess there is an environmental saving.

I'm happy to bash Apple like the the next guy, but it seems a bit of a weird stance.

Donations

Headley_Grange

I've got a drawerfull of USB chargers they can have if they send me a shipping label.

The rest

Snowy

I think just about everyone else does not include a charger, are they going to get a fine too?

Simple Compromise?

aerogems

Apple throws in a voucher code to units headed to Brazil that can be used to get the AC adapter component free on the Apple online store. It effectively makes the devices “complete” while also preserving the environmental impact reduction. Which, let’s face it, is just a happy coincidence to it allowing Apple to shave a couple dollars off the iPhone BOM which goes right to the bottom line because they certainly aren’t reducing MSRPs.

Easy Fix

Anonymous Coward

If Apple are truly doing this to help the environment, just make it an optional and no additional cost item when buying a phone. Tick a box, "Yes, I need a charger (no extra charge)", or "No, I don't need a charger"

Re: Easy Fix

Howard Sway

The problem with that is that everybody would tick the "Yes, I need a charger (no extra charge)" box, then sell the official Apple charger on eBay if they didn't need it. Just offer the option of Phone + Charger or a cheaper Phone without charger option.

Do they require selling a gas pump with every new car?

DS999

Apple could include a certificate for a free charger with iPhone sold in Brazil, but I think this is a stupid ruling. I've probably got a dozen USB chargers, and just acquired two more last week when I bought a Bluetooth transmitter that's powered by USB and a Bluetooth wireless speaker that's charged by USB. *sigh*

Just weigh your own hurt against the hurt of all the others, and then
do what's best.
-- Lovers and Other Strangers