News: 1662037210

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Underwater datacenter will open for business this year

(2022/09/01)


A company called Subsea Cloud is planning to have a commercially available undersea datacenter operating off the coast of the US before the end of 2022, with other deployments planned for the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea.

[1]Subsea , which says it has already deployed its technology with "a friendly government faction," plans to put its first commercial pod into the water before the end of this year near Port Angeles, Washington.

The company claims that placing its datacenter modules underwater can reduce power consumption and carbon dioxide emissions by 40 percent, as well as lowering latency by allowing the datacenter to be located closer to metropolitan areas, many of which are located near the coast.

[2]

However, according to Subsea founder Maxie Reynolds, it can also deploy 1MW of capacity for as much as 90 percent less cost than it takes to get 1MW up and running at a land-based facility.

[3]

An illustration showing one of its commercial pods. Pic provided by Subsea

"The savings are the result of a smaller bill of materials, and less complexities in terms of deployment and maintenance," Reynolds told us. "It's complex and costly to put in the infrastructure in metropolitan areas, and in rural areas too: there are land rights and permits to consider and labor is slower and can be more expensive."

The Port Angeles deployment, known as Jules Verne, will comprise one 20ft pod, which is similar in size and dimensions to a standard 20-foot shipping container (a TEU or Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit). Inside, there is space for about 16 datacenter racks accommodating about 800 servers, according to Subsea. Additional capacity, if and when required, is delivered by adding another pod. The pod-to-shore link in this deployment provides a 100Gbps connection.

[4]

[5]

As it is a commercial deployment, Jules Verne will be open for any prospective clients or partners to come and check it out, virtually or otherwise, according to Reynolds. It will be sited in shallow water, visible from the port, whereas the Njord01 pod in the Gulf of Mexico and the Manannan pod in the North Sea are expected to be deeper, at 700-900ft and 600-700ft respectively.

[6]Datacenter operator groups pledge to cut water consumption

[7]Intel takes deep dive into immersion cooling with GRC

[8]Intel's net positive water use only tells part of the story

[9]Iceotope attracts funds for liquid cooling from global investors

However, Jules Verne will not likely be used by many customers, as Subsea expects to use it mostly to demonstrate compliance to organizations and advocates that will be inspecting the pod and site, and this may disrupt client operations.

"We are in talks with two of the well-known hyperscalers, though, so it's still a little up in the air," Reynolds said.

The Subsea pods are kept cool by being immersed in water, which is one reason for the reduced power and CO 2 emissions. Inside, the servers are also immersed in a dielectric coolant, which conducts heat but not electricity. However, the Subsea pods are designed to passively disperse the heat, rather than using pumps as is typical in [10]submersion cooling in land-based datacenters.

[11]

But what happens if something goes wrong, or a customer wants to replace their servers? According to Subsea, customers can schedule periodic maintenance, including server replacement, and the company says that would take 4-16 hours for a team to get to the site, bring up the required pod(s), and replace any equipment.

The viability of underwater datacenters has already been demonstrated by Microsoft, which has deployed several over the past decade as part of its [12]Project Natick experiment. The most recent was [13]recovered from the seabed off the Scottish Orkney islands in 2020 , and contained 12 racks with 864 servers. Unlike the Subsea pods, the Project Natick enclosure was filled with nitrogen.

Microsoft reported that only a "handful" of servers failed during the course of its experiment, and Subsea expects its datacenters to require less maintenance due to the reduced risk of environmental contamination like dust and debris and reduced thermal shock.

[14]

Subsea said it plans to colocate datacenters at sites offering various types of renewable energy infrastructure, and that it aims for its datacenters to consuming renewable power only by 2026. ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.subseacloud.com/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YxDXGQbTBDhx9Fn4djSOqwAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2022/09/01/subsea_unit.jpg

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YxDXGQbTBDhx9Fn4djSOqwAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YxDXGQbTBDhx9Fn4djSOqwAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/28/climate_neutral_datacenter_pact/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/15/intel_grc_liquid_cooling/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/13/intels_net_positive_water_use/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/06/iceotope_funding/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/02/immersion_iceotope_cooling/

[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YxDXGQbTBDhx9Fn4djSOqwAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[12] https://news.microsoft.com/innovation-stories/project-natick-underwater-datacenter/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/14/natick_back/

[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YxDXGQbTBDhx9Fn4djSOqwAAAJE&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Paul Crawford

"We are in talks with two of the well-known hyperscalers, though, so it's still a little up in the air," Reynolds said.

Surely it should be "down in the water"?

No, no, no

Anonymous Coward

It's currently up in the air, but they're hoping that they'll be successful and get things down in the water.

Anonymous Coward

Under the sea, under the sea

Darling, it's better down where it's wetter

Take it from me...

On Call

Arthur the cat

It'll be interesting to see the future On Call/Who, Me stories such data centres generate.

"There was a swordfish in the blade server."

"Data centre clams up."

Re: On Call

ComputerSays_noAbsolutelyNo

During the trouble-shooting session

the PFY torpedoed the tug

instead of the squashing the bug.

Also ... does software piracy take on a different form, when data centers are maritime?

-> I'll get my coat

Re: On Call

Commswonk

It'll be interesting to see the future On Call/Who, Me stories such data centres generate

"My data centre is full of eels..."

Re: On Call

Anonymous Coward

Or

... "Ping flood drowns out website users in latest cyber attack"

... "Underwater data center suffers Denial Of Seawater attack (DOSea) when it was lifted out of the water and overheated, ultimately resulting in a Denial of service (DOS)"

A flood of enquiries will result

alain williams

from this announcement.

This will make a splash in the hosting market.

"only a "handful" of servers failed during the course of its experiment"

Little Mouse

In my experience the number one cause of outages in data centres is well-intentioned but fat-fingered IT guys like me, tripping over cables, bumping buttons, etc, "Who, Me?" style.

I'm not even slightly surprised that a datacentre running with minimal human interference would typically tick along just fine.

Re: "only a "handful" of servers failed during the course of its experiment"

CapeCarl

In my semi-recent 9 year tenure at a corporate data center with a few thousand servers, whenever users called about what seemed like a server just dropping off line: "Was anyone in Pod X row Y recently?"

The whole data center staff was pinged immediately. We had to first prove none of us were guilty of a cable(s) faux pas THEN look to triage the issue.

...And maybe 10% of the time, we were the problem.

Wanted: Data Center Engineer

CapeCarl

Must have scuba experience.

Pirate Dave

"According to Subsea, customers can schedule periodic maintenance, including server replacement, and the company says that would take 4-16 hours for a team to get to the site, bring up the required pod(s), and replace any equipment."

I wonder if "schedule periodic maintenance" is on-demand or on a set schedule? I mean, 800 servers could potentially be 800 clients, which, if on-demand, could mean the pod spends as much time on the surface in dry-dock getting hardware swapped out as it does submerged. Or is each pod dedicated to a single customer? That might make more sense, but then it's potentially a bunch of less-than-optimal pods hanging around down there.

Yet Another Anonymous coward

It makes a lot more sense for a cloud service than a co-lo

You can't have 800 different users all with their own server who all want access, but you can have AWS where they keep running it until >10% of the servers fail and then replace it

Woody: Hey, Mr. Peterson, what do you say to a cold one?
Norm: See you later, Vera, I'll be at Cheers.
-- Cheers, Norm's Last Hurrah

Sam: Well, look at you. You look like the cat that swallowed the canary.
Norm: And I need a beer to wash him down.
-- Cheers, Norm's Last Hurrah

Woody: Would you like a beer, Mr. Peterson?
Norm: No, I'd like a dead cat in a glass.
-- Cheers, Little Carla, Happy at Last, Part 2