T-Mobile and SpaceX hope to deliver phone service from space
- Reference: 1661524210
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/08/26/tmobile_spacex_phone/
- Source link:
The two companies announced the scheme under the banner of "Coverage Above and Beyond" at an event hosted by SpaceX founder, CEO, and Chief Engineer Elon Musk and T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert. The goal is to bring together T-Mobile's terrestrial wireless network with the Starlink low Earth orbit satellite constellation operated by SpaceX.
According to T-Mobile, the service will initially support text messaging "practically everywhere in the continental US," plus Hawaii, parts of Alaska, Puerto Rico, and US territorial waters, starting with a beta in select areas by the end of next year.
There will be some technical challenges to overcome around the compatibility side of things.
But the two companies said that after this is up and running they plan to extend support to voice and data coverage. They also said that they hope to expand Coverage Above and Beyond globally by working with other global carriers.
"We've always thought differently about what it means to keep customers connected, and that's why we're working with the best to deliver coverage above and beyond anything customers have ever seen before," said Sievert.
[1]
T-Mobile's Michael Sievert with SpaceX's Elon Musk
SpaceX insists the system has been designed so that "no modifications are required to the cellphone everyone has in their pocket today, and no new firmware, software updates, or apps are needed."
This is in contrast to some other schemes that aim to extend mobile phone services using satellites, which are building on updates to the 5G specifications that will be supported by new handsets.
[2]
One such project was announced by [3]Qualcomm, Ericsson, and Thales last month following the approval in March of satellite-driven 5G non-terrestrial networks (5G NTNs) in Release 17 of the 5G specifications from the 3GPP telecommunications standards body.
[4]After suffering $1b subsidy snub, Starlink lands $2m US Air Force deal
[5]Starlink satellite dish cracked on stage at Black Hat
[6]FCC decides against giving Starlink $1b in rural broadband subsidies
[7]SpaceX demonstrates that it too can shower the Earth with debris
Ericsson said that changes to support 5G NTNs would be minimal, comprising some software additions and a new filter to support the satellite band, but would still require users to have a new handset.
'StarLink has no authorization to deploy v2 satellites' – analyst
There are some question marks over whether a satellite service really will work with any existing cellphone handset, and what effect this might have on the battery life of the device, for example.
"There will be some technical challenges to overcome around the compatibility side of things (satellite, antennas talking to phones), also the mobile devices will be continuously seeking a signal which will most likely drain the battery," said PP Foresight telecoms analyst Paolo Pescatore. "While some time will still be needed, SpaceX continues to make progress," he added.
[8]
[9]
Coverage Above and Beyond can be seen as a complementary technology to terrestrial networks, allowing users to continue texting and eventually make a cellphone call even when they leave areas that are covered by terrestrial networks.
"The important thing about this is that it means there are no dead zones anywhere in the world for your cell phone," Musk said.
[10]
But Gartner analyst Bill Ray said that there are significant barriers, not least that SpaceX satellites are not currently capable of delivering the service.
"StarLink was already planning to deploy bigger satellites (v2, about four times the weight), so those will have a bigger antenna, but StarLink has no authorization to deploy v2 satellites, which are needed for several reasons including to run this system," he said. "This is in contrast to SpaceMobile and Lynk, which already have permission to launch."
He also noted that StarLink does not yet have authorization to run a US service using those frequencies, adding that this was also the case for SpaceMobile and Lynk, who both need regional permission to provide service (SpaceMobile has a test licence from the FCC for the satellite currently awaiting launch).
[11]
As for the implications, Ray said that while "global broadband (such as that offered by SpaceMobile) will have a bigger impact... being able to assume connectivity will be transformative."
T-Mobile and SpaceX, meanwhile, have issued an open invitation to other carriers to collaborate with them and help build truly global connectivity. T-Mobile committed to offer reciprocal roaming to providers that opted to work with them on the project.
"Ultimately this is good news for consumers to ensure they are able to receive connectivity in hard-to-reach areas," said Pescatore. "It is better than nothing and lots of work is still needed to ensure more services, features and available, but for now reliable and robust connectivity is paramount."
Ray told us: "Just knowing that a connection will always be available changes how people view remote regions – mountain rescue organizations are going to be busy saving more lives (but spending less time searching) – but we will also see bigger shifts as people are able to access cloud computing services from anywhere." ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2022/08/26/space-x-sievert-musk.jpg
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YwjuGxwovgk2@iAY8@C-TgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/11/qualcomm_ericsson_thales_orbit_5g/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/16/spacex_military_contract/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/12/starlink_terminal_hack_black_hat/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/11/fcc_starlink_rural_internet/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/03/spacex_debris/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YwjuGxwovgk2@iAY8@C-TgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YwjuGxwovgk2@iAY8@C-TgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YwjuGxwovgk2@iAY8@C-TgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YwjuGxwovgk2@iAY8@C-TgAAAJM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Colour me baffled...
I have no mobile coverage but have Starlink. My phone number is only really used as a device ID. I make phone calls and send messages using whatsapp, telegram etc and companies (DHL, paypal etc) send me messages using those. Most other codes i need come via installed apps. Only my Spanish banking app tries to send me old fashioned SMS thingies. So I'm asking myself why I need a phone signal?
Weird. Oh, Starlink dropped their service price yesterday. Down from 108€ a month to 70€.
Many thanks Mr Musk.
I am very dubious about this!
I cannot see how this can possibly work as promised; my reasons for saying this:
1. Musk is involved, and we know how reliable he is!
2. Mobile phones are designed to communicate to base stations that are typically less than 30 km away (you can get further, but only in ideal weather conditions). For a LEO satellite at, say, 300 km altitude the signal is going to be attenuated by at least 3 orders of magnitude, probably more given the frequency bands involved (rain-fade is a bitch).
3. The frequencies used by mobile phones are reserved for terrestrial use only, they cannot be used for satellite up- or down-links. Any attempt to use them for that purpose is going to trigger legal action (probably by the other mobile phone networks). I personally know of at least two hybrid mobile-satellite networks that failed due to this problem.
4. Doppler is going to be a bitch to solve; mobile waveforms are design to operate in an environment of low doppler (caused by travelling a few 100 kmh). The sort of Doppler associated with a satellite is way outside of the waveform specifications.
5. Musk is involved, and we know how reliable he is!
Re: I am very dubious about this!
1. agreed, probably trying to raise SpaceX share price so he can afford Twitter.
2. AST satellite mobile has a system in development. The sat is the size of a basketball court, divided roughly into 100 individual antennae, each of which is beam steerable in two dimensions. Those are much bigger antennae than your average base station.
3. No idea, but as they use mobile phones at normal power rather than sat-links at high power, I'm guessing the regulators won't have a problem in sensible countries, probably will be a problem in countries that don't like information moving freely.
4. Not when it's overhead.
I would think acquisition would be a challenge as you can't use a narrowly focused beam, so the signals will be very weak.
Google tells me that Starlink satellites are about 340 miles up. From the south coast of Scotland it's sometimes possible to get a mobile connection to Manx Telecom, the nearest antennas for which are about fifty miles away. Starlink will have about 2% of that signal strength to play with. Good luck to them.
Global coverage. As long as you're in America. And only text. And have a massive phone battery.
There's a reason satellite phones are chunky with sizable antennas on top - this may theoretically work with existing phones, but will require a whole new generation before its practical.
"being able to assume connectivity will be transformative"
To raping privacy with services that only ever work on-line.
Of course, outside of cities but inside buildings I have some doubts about the satellite service closing the link budget...
Will there be nowhere
that my wife can't complain that I don't read her messages?
Really?
" no dead zones anywhere in the world for your cell phone "
...for an undisclosed but probably horrible price! Was gonna complain about user terminal battery life as well, but that's been covered:-)
Just Muskish blue-sky thinking and hype as usual? Time will tell.