PanWriter: Cross-platform writing tool runs on anything and outputs to anything
- Reference: 1661330049
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/08/24/panwriter/
- Source link:
If you are a programmer there is an almost embarrassing abundance of text editors, from crusty old things from the 1970s that require you to actively cultivate Stockholm Syndrome, to sophisticated modern efforts that try to type your code for you. There are fewer choices if what you write is intended for humans, rather than computers, to read.
Of course, there are word processors, although Microsoft Word has killed most of them off by now. Its single most valuable tool, Outline View, is now a niche feature that the freebie web and Android versions don't bother to include. There's always [1]WordPerfect, the killer app that won't die , if you have the time to learn its UI. LibreOffice is very handy, but also doesn't implement the outliner.
[2]
Click to enlarge
But these are very complex tools, festooned with options to format and print your text, and a gazillion controls to fiddle with. Sometimes you just want something dead simple: words, maybe bold and italics , and hyperlinks because it's the 22nd century, and that's about it. That's where [3]PanWriter comes in.
It uses Markdown, which is a sort of lowest-common-denominator markup language. Markdown is readable as plain text with a tiny bit of formatting, but even with practice, it's easy to forget which is bold and which is underline, or which parentheses to use. PanWriter has a handy WYSIWYG live preview that shows you at a glance if you've got it right.
[4]Running DOS on 64-bit Windows and Linux: Just because you can
[5]Fancy some new features? Try general-purpose Linux alternative Liquorix
[6]Taekwindow: Time to make your middle mouse button earn its keep
[7]Wolfing down ebooks during lockdown? You might want to check out Calibre, the Swiss Army ebook tool
It has no code completion or anything: none of the stuff coders like that gets in a writer's way, no syntax highlighting, no line numbers. In fact it has next to no UI, just a menu bar. It understands the standard keystrokes, such as Ctrl-S to Save, that any CUA editor does. Run it full-screen and all you get is text, which is what you want.
Behind the scenes, it integrates with [8]Pandoc , which means it can output almost any format you could ask, from HTML to RTF to multiple word processor document types. The Reg FOSS desk finds the "Export as rich text to clipboard" feature very handy as it lets the OS sort out what format is best without asking.
[9]
There are many rivals out there – for instance, [10]Typora , which has more features, but PanWriter beats it on price: it's free. It's an Electron app, which means it's not small, but then today 130MB isn't all that big. The Linux version comes as an AppImage, a single file that runs on any distro.
[11]
Without bloating the app with extra features, the one thing we'd like to see is an integrated wordcount, but otherwise, even at the current version 0.8.4, PanWriter is close to perfect. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/20/wordperfect_for_unix_for_linux/
[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2022/08/23/screenshot-css.png
[3] https://panwriter.com/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/28/friday_foss_fest_running_dos/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/25/friday_foss_fest_liquorix_kernel/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/04/friday_foss_fest_taekwindow/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/21/friday_foss_fest_calibre/
[8] https://pandoc.org/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YwX2vH1didhn56Vudx25VAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[10] https://typora.io/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YwX2vH1didhn56Vudx25VAAAAMU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
That's the Electron bit which is essentiallay a browser runtime.
Enter candidate for dead simplest text editor
"Sometimes you just want something dead simple: words, maybe bold and italics, and hyperlinks because it's the 22nd century, and that's about it."
If we are in the mood of semi-randomly pitching FOSS software, than I ll throw one in the mix.
That is also where ViM comes in, at just a bit more than 1/10 the size. If you really like Pandoc, it has support for that as well. And yes, it is cross-platform.
Zim desktop Wiki is about 5 meg. WYSWIG/Code/ Web server of selected content,,,,,
I see.
"...because it's the 22nd century, and that's about it."
Getting a bit ahead of ourselves aren't we?
Heh heh...
"Actively cultivate Stockholm Syndrome." Apoplectic rants from vim|emacs fans in 3...2...1...
Re: Heh heh...
Guilty as charged
Also
I haven't tried it in many years, but [1]Lyx is still a thing.
[1] https://www.lyx.org/
What's it for?
The article fails to say what we should use this for? Is this a nearly WYSIWYG for Markdown?
I've used Pandoc in the past and it's great, though I normally use ReST + Sphinx for documentation and quite a few text editors have support for ReST or Markdown. My mail client, MailMate uses Markdown to create HTML mail and includes a preview.
Nah
> it integrates with Pandoc
As an option or as a dependency? Because the latter means about half a gigabyte of LaTeX stuff being dragged into the system.
> Electron.
Nein, Danke.
I use Kate / Kwrite which syntax highlights markdown quite nicely and open the document in Okular, which watches the file for changes. More than does the job for me.
A plea for AsciiDoc i.s.o. Markdown
Use whatever editor you like with or without extensions but rather try to write in AsciiDoc and not in yet another non-standard extended Markdown dialect. And yes, AsciiDoc is Markdown compatible (for the 'standard' Markdown bits).
https://opensource.com/article/22/8/drop-markdown-asciidoc?utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=weekly&sc_cid=7013a00000383eXAAQ
130MB for a barebones editor is absurd.