News: 1659362594

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Chipmakers warned: US CHIPS Act funds are not for 'stock buybacks'

(2022/08/01)


The US Commerce Department says it will strictly control use of subsidies under the recently passed CHIPS and Science Act, which promises to unlock billions of dollars in funding for domestic chip manufacturing.

The eagerly anticipated [1]spending bill paves the way for $280 billion in funding for science and technology, roughly $52 billion of which is earmarked for boosting US semiconductor production. Its passing was greeted by companies such as Intel and [2]Micron , the latter of which promised to ramp up stateside memory production over the next few years in exchange for some of that cash.

However, the Commerce Department has given chipmakers notice that it will not be allowing a free-for-all, and will not let them use government funding for "stock buybacks or to pad their bottom line", it said in a [3]published statement .

[4]

Instead, subsidies awarded will be "no larger than is necessary to ensure a project happens here in the United States", the Commerce Department said, adding that it wanted to avoid a situation where states and municipalities became embroiled in a subsidy competition in the race to attract chipmakers to build there.

[5]

[6]

The Department also warned that it will not hesitate to clawback funds or pursue other remedies from semiconductor companies that are found to have misused taxpayer dollars.

Funding will come with conditions attached: chipmakers that receive a CHIPS subsidy will be prohibited from engaging in “significant transactions in China or other countries of concern” involving any leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing capacity for a period of ten years.

[7]

While the funding decision is being welcomed by the semiconductor companies, the US is by no means the only territory offering subsidies to chipmakers in a bid to boost local chip manufacturing, so the CHIPS ACT may not turn out to be the springboard back to US dominance of the semiconductor industry that some are expecting.

China is said to have already invested $80 billion of a [8]planned $150 billion in government subsidies in its bid to become the global leader in all segments of the semiconductor industry by 2030. South Korea last year announced a [9]package of investments worth over $450 billion for its chip industry, with its eyes also on becoming a global supply chain leader.

[10]Global chip shortage far from over and now semiconductor market faces slowdown

[11]China 'must seize TSMC' if the US were to impose sanctions

[12]EU directs €11bn toward European Chips Act to build homegrown semiconductor industry

[13]Germany makes new move to attract chip manufacturers

Elsewhere, the EU announced the first €11 billion (about $11.2 billion) investment as part of its [14]European Chips Act earlier this year, which is expected to grow to more than €43 billion (about $44 billion) by 2030.

As noted by the Wall Street Journal, this effectively means that countries around the world are involved in a race to subsidize semiconductor manufacturing in order to avoid being left behind by rivals. However, the US government is expected to coordinate with other chip-making countries that are allies to avoid damaging subsidy competitions.

In May, the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) met to discuss [15]cooperation on semiconductor supply chains between the trading superpowers, and one of the key goals of this was a coordination of policy and to avoid a 'subsidy race’ between the two.

[16]

Additionally, the US is seeking a similar level of cooperation with Japan. Last week, the pair agreed to establish a joint research center for next-generation semiconductors as part of a new high-level economic dialog aimed at countering China’s growing influence and to combat the disruption caused by the Russian war against Ukraine.

According to [17]Reuters , the new research center is expected to be set up in Japan by the end of this year and will initially research 2nm chip technology. The facility will also include a prototype production line and may begin producing semiconductors by 2025. ®

Get our [18]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/28/house_chips_act_passes/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/29/micron_pledges_us_memory_expansion/

[3] https://www.nist.gov/semiconductors/taxpayer-protections

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Yuf4sYTy7asVCWkYmJ67wQAAAFY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yuf4sYTy7asVCWkYmJ67wQAAAFY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Yuf4sYTy7asVCWkYmJ67wQAAAFY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yuf4sYTy7asVCWkYmJ67wQAAAFY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://itif.org/publications/2021/02/18/moores-law-under-attack-impact-chinas-policies-global-semiconductor/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/14/south_korea_semiconductor_stimulus/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/20/global_chip_shortage_not_over/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/07/china_must_seize_tsmc/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/08/european_chips_act/

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/06/germany_chipmaker_subsidies/

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/08/european_chips_act/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/16/ttc_paris_meeting/

[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Yuf4sYTy7asVCWkYmJ67wQAAAFY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[17] https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-japan-set-agree-joint-research-semiconductors-media-2022-07-29/

[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Capitalism

Yet Another Anonymous coward

So I need to dump all my Intel shares now. If they aren't allowed to return money to shareholders, as dividends or buybacks, then they have no value

Re: Capitalism

Swarthy

??? Please tell me I've tripped over Poe's law again!

They are absolutely allowed to return value, they just aren't allowed to take federal money and funnel it directly to shareholders. The have to actually use it to make things first, hopefully increasing the value, before enriching the shareholders.

I'm glad the lawmakers have thought of this, even if it took them multiple rounds of "economic investment" where the companies did abuse the subsidies (Stock buy-backs, marking the money as "profit" and disbursing dividends based on it; never using it for pay-roll, debt mitigation, or what it was earmarked for) before the lawmakers thought about making sure it can't be abused.

Re: Capitalism

Yet Another Anonymous coward

So they are allowed to take $1bn from the government and then return $1bn in dividends as long as they are a different pile of money

Re: Capitalism

mattaw2001

Yep, that is the deal, you have got it right. However I feel that context is everything. Here is the relevant pieces to try to better understand the ideas and motivation properly:

However I would like to make two key points:

1. The goal of this handout is to make sure that manufacturing plants are built in the USA and not other countries, typically guaranteeing decades of investment and employment. It also helps keep RnD here.

2. Their opponents are being subsidized for strategic reasons (EU and China). The history of offshoring of US manufacturing is often due to a specific nation state's intentional strategy. It is hard to compete with that.

3. It puts some ties on collaborating with China to retard their semiconductor industry.

Overall it probably helps meet the government's primary duty of keeping their citizens safe and free. Never underestimate the power of a nation state to simply "not sell you something" to affect policy. Secondarily, it is likely to be at most revenue neutral for the USA, or a positive, if it keeps the factories in the USA.

Re: Capitalism

doublelayer

You are aware that you can sell your share for a higher amount if the company does well and is generating more profits, and that they can pay you a higher dividend if they have more profits, right? This just says that they can't take a chunk of money and call it profit. They can still build something with it, generate a real profit from the use of that thing, and use that profit. They also won't have to pay as much in the construction costs for the thing that eventually generates the profit. Unless your theory is that they will fail to build the facilities they say they will, this should encourage you to hold their stock, all other things equal.

Meanwhile, in the UK...

Mishak

Pleased

StrangerHereMyself

I'm pleased to hear the noises coming out of Washington. Subsidies have, in the past, been avidly abused to prop-up C-level execs' bonuses.

I'm purring with delight that the government is keeping a sharp eye on our tax dollars and attaching some strings to the money being provided.

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss
the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.