Huawei under investigation for having tech installed near US missile silos
- Reference: 1658420110
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/07/21/huawei_missile_silo_spying/
- Source link:
The investigation, [1]according to Reuters , was opened by the US Commerce Department in early 2021, subpoenaing Huawei in April for information on "the company's policy on sharing data with foreign parties that its equipment could capture from cell phones, including messages and geolocational data."
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said that cell towers around Montana's Malmstrom Air Force Base, which oversees part of the US's missile fields, contain Huawei technology. Intercontinental ballistic missile silos in Nebraska and Wyoming are also adjacent to cell towers that run on Huawei tech.
[2]
Reuters failed to find any information that would help it determine the location and scope of Huawei equipment near US military facilities, or whether such equipment was capable of collecting the information US authorities claim.
Just another day at heavily sanctioned Huawei
The US government has cracked down aggressively on Chinese tech companies since a [3]2019 executive order that put telecommunications equipment coming from "foreign adversaries" like China and Russia under close scrutiny. Huawei was one of the largest targets, with 70 of its affiliates placed on the US entity list that blocks companies from doing business with US firms shortly after the order went into effect.
[4]Huawei looks to staff for strategy to reverse declining fortunes
[5]Huawei claims it's halved the time needed to build a 1,000-rack datacenter
[6]Leica and Huawei terminate trading agreement amid US sanctions
[7]Canada bans Huawei and ZTE from 5G networks, citing national security risks
Huawei has repeatedly asserted its innocence.
Per Reuters, Huawei's April subpoena was one of the first issued using the 2019 order as its justification. It gave Huawei 30 days to provide seven years of records of its relationship with foreign entities that would have access to US user data.
[8]
US sanctions against the Chinese tech giant have resulted in considerable downturn in results, with a 28.6 percent [9]drop in Huawei's revenue in 2021 and continued drops in the first quarter of 2022. Huawei has even [10]turned to its employees for advice on the company's direction in the face of revenue-crushing sanctions, urging them to speak freely if they have ideas on how to transform the business.
Huawei and rival Chinese telecom company, ZTE, were further targeted by a 2021 Federal Communications Commission program that would offer US telecoms reimbursement for " [11]ripping and replacing " Chinese hardware. The program was recently revealed to be [12]$3 billion short thanks to an excess of applications.
[13]
Due to the shortfall, it was reported that a Nebraska telecom provider with extensive Huawei hardware deployments wouldn't begin any removals until the FCC could cover costs.
If China is listening, it's sure to get down to business now that its alleged window into US military facilities has been propped open. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-us-probes-chinas-huawei-over-equipment-near-missile-silos-2022-07-21/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YtnMgivBOkh8NL83lzWg3gAAABA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2019/05/15/president_trump_huawei_emergency_ban/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/06/huawei_employees_strategy/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/27/huawei_next_gen_dc_facility/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/24/xiaomi_leica_smartphone_cameras/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/20/canada_bans_huawei_and_zte/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YtnMgivBOkh8NL83lzWg3gAAABA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/05/huawei_staff_dividend/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/06/huawei_employees_strategy/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/07/secure_and_trusted_communications_reimbursement_program_overrun/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/18/scrp_shortfall/
[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YtnMgivBOkh8NL83lzWg3gAAABA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: The US still trying to justify its anti-Huawei stance
If China weren't spying, they wouldn't be doing their job. Just because the US does it, doesn't mean it is in their best interest to allow others to do it to them. For the rest of the world, pick your poison.
Re: The US still trying to justify its anti-Huawei stance
>If China weren't spying, they wouldn't be doing their job.
They, like others, are most probably using the NSA backdoors in US manufactured kit...
What I like is that US telco's are supposed to be removing Huawei kit from their networks, so why are US telcos installing Huawei kit in new cells...
Message to the world
Check if you have any American equipment located close to any sensitive areas in your country, you are being spied upon.
Re: Message to the world
Interesting that you were down-voted when it came to public knowledge a few years ago that the US had been doing exactly that to embassies of 'friendly' countries all over the world.
Re: Message to the world
I see the up and down votes on comments as good indications of the El Reg registered readers politics.
Re: Message to the world
Does this count?
[1]https://search.theregister.com/?q=Menwith
[2]https://www.theregister.com/2001/06/11/us_expands_echelon_spying/
[1] https://search.theregister.com/?q=Menwith
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2001/06/11/us_expands_echelon_spying/
The US still trying to justify its anti-Huawei stance
As Huawei is an equipment supplier, where its customers (the telcos) place cell towers is outside its control.
A more accurate set of justifications would be
1) Huawei equipment is cheaper than Cisco's hurting the profits of Cicso.
2) Huawei equipment does not come with the NSA backdoors built in.
3) The US is trying to cripple the economy of China (see also the restrictions imposed on other Chinese manufacturers (eg SMIC)).