Weird Flex, but OK: Now you can officially turn these PCs, Macs into Chromebooks
- Reference: 1657828747
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/07/14/chrome_os_flex_launched/
- Source link:
[1]Flex was [2]unveiled in February as a version of Chrome OS that could run on any modern-ish Intel or AMD (sorry, not Arm) processor. Since that debut, the number of devices certified to run Chrome OS Flex has almost doubled, from some 250 to more than 400, according to Google.
Among [3]certified models are several MacBook Air devices, Microsoft Surface, ASUS, Acer, and Lenovo machines along with a laundry list of Dell machines. Google plans to [4]continually certify older devices for Flex.
[5]
To get the Chrome OS experience – which, as the name suggests, involves doing pretty much everything on your desktop through the Chrome browser – you would need to buy a Chromebook with it installed, or go through a bit of a convoluted process to put the OS on a system. Chrome OS Flex is supposed to make that easy, and work on a range of non-Chromebooks.
[6]x86 Raspberry Pi Desktop is a great way to revive an old PC
[7]Linux Mint 21 hits beta, and it's looking fresh
[8]EndeavourOS Artemis: Arch Linux, but a bit friendlier
[9]SpiralLinux: Anonymous creator of GeckoLinux puts out new Debian remix
Chrome OS Flex got its start at NeverWare, which developed a version of the OS it called CloudReady that made it easier to install Chrome OS on unsupported devices. Google acquired NeverWare in 2020 and folded it into the Chrome OS team, and thus Flex was born.
The [10]installation of Flex is designed to be simple with fairly minimal hardware requirements to maximize the number of devices that can run it. You'll need a 64-bit processor, 4 GB of RAM, 16 GB of storage and full admin access to the machine's BIOS. If those conditions are met, all that's left is to make a bootable USB drive, for which at least 8 GB of space is needed.
[11]
[12]
Those specifications are enough to boot, say, a lightweight Linux distro, so if you're comfortable with that environment and only running a browser in it, you could make do with that. If you or users prefer the single-minded nature of Chrome OS, continue on. The specs are also pretty close to Windows 10's [13]requirements so Google's offering is really targeted at people who just want to breathe Chrome OS into their kit.
If you want out of Windows 10 and your machine can't start Windows 11, and you don't want a full Linux environment, maybe Chrome OS Flex is for you.
Beware: Critical differences abound
Google designed Chrome OS Flex as an enterprise product, so it's able to be managed and deployed remotely like the standard version of Chrome OS. Many of the security features built into Chrome OS work in Flex too, but there are [14]a lot of differences between the two versions of the Linux-powered OS.
Businesses considering Chrome OS Flex for their older hardware, or even individuals installing it at home, need to be aware of some of the most critical differences between the two before installing:
Because it runs on hardware without Google's own security chips, Flex doesn't offer Chrome OS verified boot. Microsoft supports Flex's bootloader, so some Windows devices may allow UEFI secure boot in Flex.
Flex does not automatically manage BIOS or UEFI firmware updates.
Because Flex devices may not have a Trusted Platform Module, Flex won't store encryption keys at the hardware level.
Flex does not support Android apps or Google Play.
Flex does not support running Windows VMs through Parallels.
Flex support for Linux developer environment varies per model.
Non-Flex certified devices cannot be enrolled in the Google Admin console.
Flex does not support zero-touch enrollment or forced re-enrollment.
Additionally, Google notes that many hardware features on supported hardware haven't been tested. "They might not work as expected, or even not work at all," Google's support page says.
Optical drives, fingerprint readers, FireWire ports, IR and face recognition cameras, docks and connectors, styluses and pens and Thunderbolt are all unsupported. Google did say that USB-C and mini Displayport will both still work despite the lack of Thunderbolt support. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://chromeenterprise.google/os/chromeosflex/
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/16/google_chrome_os/
[3] https://support.google.com/chromeosflex/answer/11513094#zippy=%2Cmicrosoft%2Cdell
[4] https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/chrome-enterprise/chromeos-flex-ready-to-scale-to-pcs-and-macs
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YtCR-EFE5PJmvK4853TnFwAAAA0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/11/raspberry_pi_desktop_update/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/07/14/mint_21_beta/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/29/endeavouros_artemis_226/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/20/spirallinux_new_debian_remix_from/
[10] https://support.google.com/chromeosflex/answer/11552529?hl=en&ref_topic=11551271
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YtCR-EFE5PJmvK4853TnFwAAAA0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YtCR-EFE5PJmvK4853TnFwAAAA0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-10-specifications
[14] https://support.google.com/chromeosflex/answer/11542901?hl=en
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: So, wait, what? Why again?
Because it's there !
It might find a use in kiosks ? Or reducing parental support calls. But chromebooks are so cheap you might as well buy one new
Personally I buy old cheap chromebooks put Linux+xfce on and use them as nice laptops fro browsing
I don't know why every headline about Flex talks about resurrecting old hardware, when the system requirements are comparable to those of any mainline version of any major Linux distro. In fact they're comparable to the sort of specs you could still fairly comfortably run Windows 10 on with a few graphic settings disabled.
If the main talking point of an OS is its suitability for older hardware, then I expect system requirements along the lines of a lightweight distro like Lubuntu, Linux Lite etc.
Headlines
Yeah, that's fair. FWIW we wanted our article to reflect the point and goals of Chrome OS Flex. It's for people who want to turn their stuff into Chromebooks in an easy, faff-free way, from what I can tell.
C.
" talks about resurrecting old hardware "
This. I read the requirement of a 64 bit processor and thought "that rules out any PC around here, then".
Plus a load of stuff about what won't work, and honestly I'm simply wondering...why?
So, wait, what? Why again?
Chrome OS, minus all of the things that would give you any reason to run it or any kind of support, plus a bunch of hassles and problems. Sounds like fun?
Or if that is not your party, just load chrome (the browser) on top of a geriatric hardware friendly Unix and get a real functioning OS and the one thing that probably works in Flex. Or send the old warhorse off to pasture and just grab one of the million Chromebooks on their way to the landfill.
Still, this project may yet get past the academic exercise phase who knows? And I am really in no position to throw stones, I once helped a fried hack together an OS on an old WinChip embedded system. We and an industry have some strange hobbies, when we aren't playing dwarf fortress.