Large Hadron Collider experiment reveals three exotic particles
- Reference: 1657036813
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/07/05/lhcb_particles/
- Source link:
A new kind of "pentaquark" [1]was spotted along with the first ever pair of "tetraquarks."
Quarks are elementary particles. There are "up", "down", "charm", "strange", "top", and "bottom." Combinations of quarks form hadrons, usually in groups of two or three. They can also group in fours and fives, however, they have only recently been observed by experiments such as the Large Hadron Collider beauty (LHCb).
[2]
The LHCb experiment looks at the differences between matter and antimatter and uses a series of sub-detectors to look for forward particles – those thrown forwards by a collision.
[3]
[4]
The results were presented today at a CERN seminar as the LHC [5]prepared for another run at data collection. The LHC was first fired up in 2010 and this latest activity is expected to last for almost four years at a record energy of 13.6 trillion electronvolts (TeV).
The four big LHC experiments have been updated to cope with the results of the upgrade. The aforementioned LHCb experiment underwent a complete revamp to increase its data-taking rate by a factor of ten. ALICE (A Large Ion Collider Experiment), which is designed to study the physics of strongly interacting matter at extreme energy densities, "is aiming at a staggering fifty-fold increase in the number of recorded collisions," according to CERN.
[6]CERN boffins zap antimatter with ultraviolet lasers in the hope of revealing the secret symmetry of the universe
[7]A dedicated licence for open-source hardware: CERN OHL approved by OSI
[8]CERN puts two new atom-smashers on its shopping list. One to make Higgs Bosons, then a next-gen model six times more energetic than the LHC
[9]Large Redmond Collider: CERN reveals plan to shift from Microsoft to open-source code after tenfold license fee hike
The ATLAS and CMS detectors are similarly expected to record more collisions during the new run than the previous two runs combined.
"We will be focusing the proton beams at the interaction points to less than 10 micron beam size, to increase the collision rate. Compared to Run 1, in which the Higgs was discovered with 12 inverse femtobarns, now in Run 3 we will be delivering 280 inverse femtobarns. This is a significant increase, paving the way for new discoveries," said director for Accelerators and Technology Mike Lamont.
[10]
Beams have been circulating around the accelerator since April following the recommissioning of CERN's injector complex to operate with increased energy and higher intensity beams. The operators of the LHC are now ready to announce "stable beams," which is the point at which the experiments can start collecting data for analysis.
Run 3 will doubtless delight skeptics who will look at the extreme conditions (intended to be similar to those just after the Big Bang) generated by the accelerator with just a little nervousness, although the world didn't appear to end during the last two runs. [11]CERN has said the thing is perfectly safe .
And now the metaphorical dial is being turned up to 11. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://home.cern/news/news/physics/lhcb-discovers-three-new-exotic-particles
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YsS0gSbysiyEgnd6mvFi-wAAAIM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YsS0gSbysiyEgnd6mvFi-wAAAIM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YsS0gSbysiyEgnd6mvFi-wAAAIM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://home.cern/news/news/physics/lhc-run-3-physics-record-energy-starts-tomorrow
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/06/boffins_zap_antimatter_with_ultraviolet/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/29/cern_ohl_approved/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/22/cern_strategy_update/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2019/06/13/cern_microsoft/
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YsS0gSbysiyEgnd6mvFi-wAAAIM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2008/06/24/lhc_safe/
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Ever get the sense...
Er... Isn't that exactly the point? Of course the current models are wrong - everyone knows a more fundamental model is needed. The point is to get more data to refine the next iteration of the model.
And, guess what, that will be wrong too. There is a meaningful philosophical question about whether we could ever gather together enough energy to work out how the universe really behaves without needing to destroy the universe itself in doing it. But LHC is nowhere near that yet, so many more slightly better but still wrong models to come!
I am just hoping we can get as far as a model which reasonably unifies Gravity and Quantum Mechanics (although it will still have many, many inconsistencies at higher energies than we can generate).
Re: Ever get the sense...
Admit. What they're really working up to is discovering just how loud it is when you smash a couple of grand pianos together at the speed of light...
Re: Ever get the sense...
The trouble is you have to do it in a vacuum!
Re: Ever get the sense...
>>> The trouble is you have to do it in a vacuum!
Well if they could find a hoover big enough to accomodate them that would be grand.
Re: Ever get the sense...
> There is a meaningful philosophical question about whether we could ever gather together enough energy to work out how the universe really behaves without needing to destroy the universe itself in doing it.
It could also be true that we could never get to the most elementary particles because the more closely we look, the more we see.
Perhaps there are *no* bottom-level particles and that it's *more fundamental particles* all the way down like some weird quantum Mandelbrot set.
Re: Ever get the sense...
Current models describe what we see, that doesn't mean they are crap.
My understanding is that the standard model describes what we see, but doesn't explain why. I am sure they'd love for the new experiments to help come up with a model that explains more.
Re: Ever get the sense...
Current models describe some of what we see (measure) very accurately; others not so accurately (dark matter and dark energies are basically placeholders for the unknown). Besides, infinity is a neat if somewhat mind blowing concept in math, but I doubt many physicists believe it really exists, despite showing up in relativity theory.
Moo
How many cows can you squeeze into a femtobarn?
Re: Moo
15, o'course. Femto is from the Danish femten, meaning 15
Re: Moo
Very small ones...
Re: Moo
McCows!
Re: Moo
You don't have to squeeze them in. The point about a barn is not that it's small, it's that it's huge.
The point about a barn is not that it’s small, it’s that it’s huge.
— unless “-barn” is from Danish barn (“child”). ;*)
Re: not bairns
No, it is actually from barn, as in large farm building. There is a long and slightly humorous explanation on wikipedia. If physicists were found putting Danish children in the LHC to bag a Nobel Prize, well that would be a very dark matter.
Re: not bairns
Dark splatter shirley!
Re: Moo
The cows have been observed emitting moo-ons.
Re: Moo
A charmingly up and down and yet strange and quarky herding method.
Re: Moo
First, assume a spherical cow...
Re: Moo
Depends how fast they are going
If at usual cow speed of 1 mph, then good luck,15'ish however if they are mooving at 99.999999% of the speed of light they will be in effect flat discs and you'll be able to stack a lot more in.
Just dont let the beams cross
Re: Moo
"Just don't let the beams cross"
Peter: Why?
Egon: It would be bad.
Peter: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?
Egon: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.
Ray: [shocked gasp] Total protonic reversal.
Peter: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.
Re: Moo
Total protonic reversal
[1]LIVE LHC WEBCAM footage
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JYkMhQ9gf8
Lifetime
How long do these particles last?
Re: Lifetime
About as long as a Tory cabinet minister.
Re: Lifetime
Its when Heisenberg's uncertainty principle collapses and you know the position is crap and so is the veracity.
Star Trek or...
Unobtainum is on the way folks... it's on the way.
Why is it so complex?
You'd think the universe would have been created with a much simpler structure. How many times did it get it wrong before the present one stabilised?
It does all seem very very complex (or is it just me?)
Ever get the sense...
...smashing stuff up at higher and higher energies to keep making new particles is simply trying to tell us, the current models are crap and that some more fundamental model is needed to explain these multitudes of spin, flavor and variety of spun out cruft?