News: 1655807421

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

UK's Post Office shells out for SAP software it thought it had

(2022/06/21)


The Post Office, a UK government-owned company, has awarded SAP a contract worth up to £2 million for software services following a misunderstanding of its SAP licences and service bundles.

A [1]contract award notice issued last week shows the Post Office – which issues postage stamps, manages the postal service, and runs one of Britain's largest network of retailers – handed SAP the deal for implementation, configuration, maintenance, and repair services for its SAP SuccessFactors performance management system.

Early in the morning, at eight o'clock, you can hear the auditor, knock, knock, knock

The Post Office stated in the award notice that it had first bought SuccessFactors software in 2016 following an audit that found Post Office Limited to be "significantly under-licenced."

The Post Office award notice said SAP, at the time, had quoted it a one-off figure of "£2.4 million plus £534k recurring annual costs" with "no additional business benefit except to maintain contractual compliance."

However, after some "significant negotiations," the Post Office secured an offer from SAP to "significantly reduce" its compliance costs and invested in SAP's SuccessFactors HR Cloud solution.

[2]

It then bought the licence from software reseller SCC via a Crown Commercial Services Framework.

[3]

[4]

But that was not the end of the Post Office's troubles.

"We have been facing operational issues since the last two years as SAP stood down our Customer Success Manager as that service is not available for indirect contract, something SAP failed to disclose," the notice said.

[5]SAP attracts further criticism for Russia presence, despite promise to leave

[6]What 'share of wallet' means and why it matters to SAP

[7]39 Post Office convictions quashed after Fujitsu evidence about Horizon IT platform called into question

[8]Exonerated: First subpostmasters cleared of criminal convictions in Post Office Horizon scandal

"There was an expectation for [services-based reseller] SCC to fulfil more activities than anticipated as an SAP partner. This has not been possible as through CCS Frameworks, SCC are limited to a 1 percent margin within the reseller contract."

As a result, the Post Office is paying SAP for services for an individual Customer Success Manager to support the SaaS product supplied direct from SAP in a deal which could be worth £2 million ($2.45 million).

[9]

SAP has been offered the opportunity to comment on the issues raised in the procurement.

A Post Office spokesperson said: "Like any business, it's vital that we have an efficient system to run our HR services. We had previously procured SAP SuccessFactors services using a SAP partner. Following expiry of that contract we have now progressed with Direct purchase through G Cloud competition and have awarded a new contract to SAP UK limited for a two-year period with an option to extend by 1 year."

The Post Office's track record with IT projects is not a happy one. [10]A statutory public inquiry was launched into the Horizon scandal, which saw hundreds of subpostmasters prosecuted over 15 years for accounting discrepancies which were later found to be the result of flawed software. Last year, 39 convictions were overturned with up to 400 more potentially being quashed. ®

Get our [11]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/eccf5d88-16d0-4cfe-8ccd-7bacf8601d97

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YrHrJhT9Rm-hnFBHN2kBvQAAAJY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YrHrJhT9Rm-hnFBHN2kBvQAAAJY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YrHrJhT9Rm-hnFBHN2kBvQAAAJY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/24/sap_russia/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/12/sap_sapphire/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/23/post_office_scandal_fujitsu_convictions_quashed/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/11/post_office_horizon_scandal_first_subpostmasters_cleared/

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YrHrJhT9Rm-hnFBHN2kBvQAAAJY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/19/post_office_horizon_scandal_public_inquiry_announced/

[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Nice business you've got there squire...

0x80004005

... it would be a shame if something happened to it.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Cereberus

So you are saying it is all due to shady practices by SAP?

I'd argue it is the Post office at fault for not doing due diligence on the contract.

If I am spending that kind of money I make sure I know exactly what I am getting, and will go out to site to make sure what is delivered is to spec.

The story quotes they were 'significantly under licensed', had significant negotiations to significantly reduce compliance costs, which only meant they reached compliance and no other business benefits were included. Shame they didn't spend any time significantly reviewing what they got from the reseller to make sure everything they needed was included but left as an expectation that the reseller would provide additional services, so obviously not checked.

You'd think they'd be more careful in how they operate, especially after the significant impact they had on employees with the Horizon failures.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Christopher Rogers

The people who did Horizon should be in prison. But instead some of those scumbags are probably still in position making these half assed decisions instead.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Charlie Clark

SAP and Oracle have obnoxious T&Cs that basically amount to being able to charge for breathing air. But nobody's prepared to challenge them in court for fear of their business going down the tubes while the case proceeds. Oh, and the monopoly commissions don't tend to get involved because the contracts are all under non-disclosure agreements.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Doctor Syntax

And yet companies keep falling for it.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Anonymous Coward

Did SAP hire a load of Oracle salesdriods? This seems like a textbook Oracle move.

There is a lesson there for everyone. Just avoid Oracle/SAP and the other usual suspects.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Doctor Syntax

It's a shared culture.

Re: Nice business you've got there squire...

Charlie Clark

You really need to talk to people who've "bought" SAP. Though, obviously they won't be able to tell you about the contracts because it's trade secrets. One of the best tricks, allegedly, is SAP owns any data processed with its products. Yep, you no longer own your own (sic) data! This goes beyond even Oracle's licence for switching the machine on.

Disappointed...

pavel.petrman

... as I expected Capita to feature in this sort of a story, too.

insecurity, n.:
Finding out that you've mispronounced for years one of your
favorite words.

Realizing halfway through a joke that you're telling it to
the person who told it to you.