SpaceX reportedly fires staffers behind open letter criticising Elon Musk
- Reference: 1655473525
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/06/17/spacex_employees_reportedly_fired_over_letter/
- Source link:
The alleged dismissals come just two days after an [1]open letter to SpaceX president and COO Gwynne Shotwell began circulating in a SpaceX Teams channel. The missive from employees said Musk's recent actions have been a source of distraction and embarrassment for SpaceX staff.
The letter asked for the company to "swiftly and explicitly separate itself" from Musk's personal brand, hold all leadership accountable for their actions, and asked that SpaceX clearly define what behaviors it considers unacceptable. The authors also said the company failed to apply its stated diversity, equity, and inclusion goals, "resulting in a workplace culture that remains firmly rooted in the status quo."
[2]
"We care deeply about SpaceX's mission to make humanity multiplanetary. But more importantly, we care about each other," the letter writers said.
[3]
[4]
However, a response – reportedly written by Shotwell – makes SpaceX's position on the employee asks explicitly clear: rock the rocket, and you're out.
In an [5]email from Shotwell to SpaceX employees obtained by the New York Times , which hasn't been reprinted in its entirety, the SpaceX president said a number of employees had been terminated, though it's unclear how many.
[6]
The Shotwell letter reportedly said that SpaceX work is too critical, and there is too much of it, with activism of this kind being something SpaceX has "no need for."
"The letter, solicitations and general process made employees feel uncomfortable, intimidated and bullied, and/or angry because the letter pressured them to sign onto something that did not reflect their views," Shotwell wrote to employees. She added that it was unacceptable to repeatedly solicit signatures during the work day, saying that the individuals had sent "repeated unsolicited emails" to thousands of SpaceX staff.
[7]SpaceX staff condemn Musk's behavior in open letter
[8]Musk can't tweet about Tesla without lawyer approval – and he's still fighting to end that
[9]If you want to launch Starship from Texas, here's some homework, FAA tells SpaceX
[10]Musk repeats threat to end $46.5bn Twitter deal – with lawyers, not just tweets
SpaceX employs 12,000 people.
Elon Musk has been involved in plenty of scandalous headlines over the past few years, much of it due to his Twitter behavior. Of particular interest in this case is Musk's settlement with a flight attendant who accused him of exposing himself on a private jet and soliciting "more" during a massage in exchange for a horse.
Shotwell defended Musk to SpaceX when the settlement news came to light, saying in an [11]email to employees that she didn't believe the accusations.
[12]
That's not the only time Shotwell has had to bat for Musk – she had to clarify her boss's statements on Juneteenth in 2020, when Musk said the holiday, which marks the end of slavery in the US, would be a company holiday, but those wanting to celebrate would need to use PTO to do so.
Shotwell [13]clarified at the time that Juneteenth would be an official company holiday beginning in 2021. She also told SpaceX staff in 2020:
"Micro-aggressions all the way to explicit race-based name calling and other intolerable aggressive behaviors occur here and this is completely not OK. SpaceX does not tolerate discrimination or racism of any kind (and in these cases we will strictly uphold our no A-hole policy)." ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/16/spacex_employees_decry_musks_behavior/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YqylIaY50qf0uYZbvJDvQAAAAEA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YqylIaY50qf0uYZbvJDvQAAAAEA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YqylIaY50qf0uYZbvJDvQAAAAEA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/17/technology/spacex-employees-fired-musk-letter.html
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YqylIaY50qf0uYZbvJDvQAAAAEA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/16/spacex_employees_decry_musks_behavior/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/15/musk_tweet_court/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/14/spacex_faa_launch/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/06/twitter_musk_bots/
[11] https://www.cnbc.com/2022/05/23/spacex-president-gwynne-shotwell-defends-elon-musk-over-sex-misconduct-allegations.html
[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YqylIaY50qf0uYZbvJDvQAAAAEA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[13] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/19/spacex-president-gwynne-shotwell-email-about-juneteenth-diversity.html
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Cheap redundancy
SpaceX's people can easily be replaced by cheap labor - it's not rocket science
Cult
Never question a cult's leadership!
Re: Cult
Never publicly insult a thin skinned boss with a propensity for having temper tantrums?
Re: Cult
Sorry... you did say “cult” didn’t you?
Re: Cult
I thought questioning a cult's leadership was the first thing you should do. If the result is termination of employment, firstly you got your answer and secondly you are better off.
Re: Cult
Did someone mention the words cult, leader and termination of employment?
[1]https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/16/cult_google_lawsuit/
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/16/cult_google_lawsuit/
Does as I say, not as I do
So Musk wants Twitter to be more "open" as to the topics it allows people to post about. But anyone criticising his Muskness is instantly silenced.
Tells you all you need to know about Elon.
Re: Does as I say, not as I do
This is not really different to the so-called free press. Rarely will you find an article which criticises billionaire owners who live in tax havens.
Re: Does as I say, not as I do
To their credit, the Washington Post has been covering the Amazon union stories pretty well, even breaking a few stories about Amazon's intimidation tactics.
Usually the bigger problem isn't who owns them, it's who pays them (i.e. advertisers). Maybe the media would cover the news differently if they had to be more candid about the fact that this story about how hard-done-by the insurance industry is will be followed by at least three adverts from insurance companies.
Never directly criticise the person paying your wages in public or work time ...
Whether Musk is a pillock or not, he's the boss, so being publicly critical is not the most sensible of things to do if you wish to keep your job ... usually a contract clause such as "thou shall not bring the company or it's brand into disrepute" covers such occurrences.
Re: Never directly criticise the person paying your wages in public or work time ...
If they enforced that one, Musk would have been out years ago - smoking spliffs in interviews, calling rescuers paedos, and many many more examples of bringing every company he is associated with in to disrepute.
Re: Never directly criticise the person paying your wages in public or work time ...
I always encourage my staff to disagree with me. In the process one of us learns something and together we're better. Not wanting to listen to different opinions or criticism just shows how bad a person you are.
Re: Never directly criticise the person paying your wages in public or work time ...
It should be worrisome that employees at a company that builds giant bombs may become afraid to speak up after examples are made of their co-workers.
A close reading...
...suggests they were fired for the solicitation of signatures. Repeated solicitations. And not for the letter's content.
Seems like the no A-hole rule was correctly applied.
Re: A close reading...
Agreed. That is a bit different from the letter itself.
Re: A close reading...
That's the excuse to avoid wrong termination lawsuits - which will happen anyway, but using that as the stated reason for firing makes them less likely to succeed.
If they can prove their diversity allegations this could get expensive
I guess we'll find out, if they sue for the wrongful dismissal. Personally, not how I would handle it. There are plenty of other jobs.
Careful what you ask for
"asked that SpaceX clearly define what behaviors it considers unacceptable"
They got what they asked for, but not what they wanted.
We care deeply about SpaceX's mission to make humanity multiplanetary
Couldn't they simply have been offered a transfer to Ark B?
"we will strictly uphold our no A-hole policy"
Unless he owns the business, of course