Proposed Innovation Act amendment would block US investment in China
(2022/06/14)
- Reference: 1655231957
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/06/14/innovation_act_investment/
- Source link:
A draft US law that would, for one thing, subsidize the US semiconductor industry, has gained an amendment that would turn the screws on American investments in foreign countries.
The proposed update states that semiconductors, large-capacity batteries, pharmaceuticals, rare-earth elements biotech, AI, quantum computing, hypersonics, fintech and autonomous technologies are all included as sectors in which foreign investment would be limited, specifically in "countries of concern," or those considered foreign adversaries, like China. The amendment also would restrict construction investments and joint ventures that would involve sharing of IP and monetary rewards.
US entities that have invested in a sector or country covered under the amendment would be required to notify the federal government, and the proposal also includes authorization for the executive branch to form an interagency panel responsible for reviewing and blocking foreign investments on national security grounds, the Wall Street Journal [1]said of the amendment.
[2]
Currently in a two-chamber conference to resolve [3]differences between the House and Senate versions of the Bipartisan Innovation Act, the amendment was introduced yesterday by House Representative Michael McCaul (R-TX) and six other bipartisan supporters. Among the broader actions the Act would take would be to fund [4]development of the US semiconductor industry.
[5]
[6]
The new proposal is a compromise between matching the outbound investment mechanisms introduced to the senate version of the bill by Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) in 2021. The previous amendments cast a wide net, and this new version is designed to align the US with outbound investment mechanisms used in ally countries, several members of the House Foreign Affairs committee said in a letter.
"The refined proposal released today has bipartisan, bicameral support and addresses industry concerns, including the scope of prospective activities, industries covered, and the prevention of duplicative authorities," the representatives [7]said .
[8]Senate edges US chip world closer to $50b subsidies by passing COMPETES Act
[9]US House passes bill to boost chip manufacturing and R&D
[10]Congressional pressure mounts to pass $52b CHIPS Act
[11]US considers $33bn sci/tech funding package
The senate version of the Bipartisan Innovation Act was [12]passed in late March, and has been in conference since then. With Congress set to take a break for Independence Day, and then not be back in session long until the August recess, time is running out to pass the bill.
In a speech last month, President Biden [13]said that tech leaders have said they're ready to increase chip manufacturing capacity in the US, stressing the bipartisan nature of the bill and Congress' general consensus to get it signed as soon as possible.
[14]
"So, every Republican and Democratic member of Congress — most of us agree on this. Pass the damn bill and send it to me," Biden said. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/bipartisan-lawmakers-propose-new-government-powers-to-block-u-s-investments-in-china-other-nations-11655147194?mod=tech_lead_pos1
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/competes_act_senate/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/07/biden_us_chip_fabs_meeting/
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://gop-foreignaffairs.house.gov/press-release/mccaul-fitzpatrick-spartz-delauro-pascrell-cornyn-casey-statement-on-national-critical-capabilities-committee-proposal/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/competes_act_senate/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/05/us_house_passes_america_competes/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/07/biden_us_chip_fabs_meeting/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2007/08/03/money_approved_scitech/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/competes_act_senate/
[13] https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/05/06/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-bipartisan-innovation-act/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
The proposed update states that semiconductors, large-capacity batteries, pharmaceuticals, rare-earth elements biotech, AI, quantum computing, hypersonics, fintech and autonomous technologies are all included as sectors in which foreign investment would be limited, specifically in "countries of concern," or those considered foreign adversaries, like China. The amendment also would restrict construction investments and joint ventures that would involve sharing of IP and monetary rewards.
US entities that have invested in a sector or country covered under the amendment would be required to notify the federal government, and the proposal also includes authorization for the executive branch to form an interagency panel responsible for reviewing and blocking foreign investments on national security grounds, the Wall Street Journal [1]said of the amendment.
[2]
Currently in a two-chamber conference to resolve [3]differences between the House and Senate versions of the Bipartisan Innovation Act, the amendment was introduced yesterday by House Representative Michael McCaul (R-TX) and six other bipartisan supporters. Among the broader actions the Act would take would be to fund [4]development of the US semiconductor industry.
[5]
[6]
The new proposal is a compromise between matching the outbound investment mechanisms introduced to the senate version of the bill by Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and John Cornyn (R-TX) in 2021. The previous amendments cast a wide net, and this new version is designed to align the US with outbound investment mechanisms used in ally countries, several members of the House Foreign Affairs committee said in a letter.
"The refined proposal released today has bipartisan, bicameral support and addresses industry concerns, including the scope of prospective activities, industries covered, and the prevention of duplicative authorities," the representatives [7]said .
[8]Senate edges US chip world closer to $50b subsidies by passing COMPETES Act
[9]US House passes bill to boost chip manufacturing and R&D
[10]Congressional pressure mounts to pass $52b CHIPS Act
[11]US considers $33bn sci/tech funding package
The senate version of the Bipartisan Innovation Act was [12]passed in late March, and has been in conference since then. With Congress set to take a break for Independence Day, and then not be back in session long until the August recess, time is running out to pass the bill.
In a speech last month, President Biden [13]said that tech leaders have said they're ready to increase chip manufacturing capacity in the US, stressing the bipartisan nature of the bill and Congress' general consensus to get it signed as soon as possible.
[14]
"So, every Republican and Democratic member of Congress — most of us agree on this. Pass the damn bill and send it to me," Biden said. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/bipartisan-lawmakers-propose-new-government-powers-to-block-u-s-investments-in-china-other-nations-11655147194?mod=tech_lead_pos1
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/competes_act_senate/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/07/biden_us_chip_fabs_meeting/
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://gop-foreignaffairs.house.gov/press-release/mccaul-fitzpatrick-spartz-delauro-pascrell-cornyn-casey-statement-on-national-critical-capabilities-committee-proposal/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/competes_act_senate/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/05/us_house_passes_america_competes/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/07/biden_us_chip_fabs_meeting/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2007/08/03/money_approved_scitech/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/competes_act_senate/
[13] https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/05/06/remarks-by-president-biden-on-the-bipartisan-innovation-act/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YqkE-@un4NJ34-xzFY8umQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Dodging
Gene Cash
No, as I seem to recall from the Tesla case, China kind of insists you build factories and employ local workers, in addition to sharing your source code and other IP grabs, if you want to sell lots of product there.
Re: Dodging
Youngone
The vast American corporation I work for has had factories in China for 30 years, and currently makes roughly $1 billion in profits from them every year.
I suspect the shareholders are ok with whatever terms the Chinese offered all those years ago.
Re: Dodging
John Brown (no body)
"I suspect the shareholders are ok with whatever terms the Chinese offered all those years ago."
Terms can change. Especially when it's an authoritarian government in charge of the terms. With the constant spats between the US and China, and the current example of Russia, I'll bet the bosses are keeping a very close eye on developments. (Or maybe have their heads in the sand while counting the profits, hoping things will stay the same)
Re: Dodging
VoiceOfTruth
-> in addition to sharing your source code
To ensure it is not full of NSA back doors.
Dodging
The so called "investment in China" in reality is tax and employment law dodging.
Why set up a factory in your own country and deal with high tax and complex employment laws if you can get Chinese to build a factory for you and if workers get upset ship them and their families to labour camps?
Big corporations actually lobby for more complex laws, so that a competition has no chance to emerge, not that they care about domestic workers etc. and to set up a shop in China you need to have a substantial budget, usually out of reach of small business (that could become big).