New York to get first right-to-repair law for electronics
- Reference: 1654299546
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/06/03/new_york_repair/
- Source link:
The [1]law bill , previously green-lit by the state senate in a 49-14 vote, now awaits the expected signature of New York Governor Kathy Hochul (D).
Assuming the New York bill becomes law as anticipated, it will be the first US state legislation to address the repairability of electronic devices. A week ago, a similar right-to-repair bill [2]died in California due to industry lobbying.
[3]
The pending New York rules require original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) "to make available, for purposes of diagnosis, maintenance, or repair, to any independent repair provider, or to the owner of digital electronic equipment manufactured by or on behalf of, or sold by, the OEM, on fair and reasonable terms, documentation, parts, and tools, inclusive of any updates to information."
[4]
[5]
That is, digital product manufacturers will have to provide independent repair services and consumers with the documentation and parts to fix their products, which benefits the environment by creating less waste and prevents equipment makers from capturing all repair revenue through authorized repair programs. It also reinforces the rights of ownership by enabling those who possess electronic devices to do with them as they see fit, without needing to deal with the product maker or approved agents.
In [6]a missive on Friday, Kyle Wiens, CEO of repair advocacy site iFixit, said the passage of the bill represents a huge win for independent repair shops, which otherwise risk being unable to compete if denied access to parts and documentation on reasonable terms.
[7]
"For the rest of us, the passage of this bill means that repairs should become less expensive and more comprehensive: People who want to fix their own stuff can," said Wiens. "And your repair experience should improve even if you’re intimidated by the thought of cracking open your laptop or phone."
[8]California Right-to-Repair bill quietly killed in committee
[9]Repairability champ Framework's modular laptop gets a speed boost
[10]Apple must fix its self-service repair program, say critics
[11]Apple's self-repair service finally launches after months of silence
The repair experience for those participating in Apple's [12]recently launched self-repair program is [13]not [14]particularly [15]good , according to early adopters, who say the difficulty of doing so allows companies that oppose repairability to appease regulators while dampening consumer enthusiasm for taking things into their own hands.
The Register asked Apple for comment and you know how that goes.
New York's Digital Fair Repair Act does not cover every electronic device. It excludes: motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment (addressed via a national agreement between automakers and repair shops); medical devices; home appliances; public safety equipment; and off-road equipment (e.g. farm machinery).
“Legislators in dozens of states have introduced Right to Repair bills, but New York is the first state to pass a law that covers popular consumer devices such as cell phones," said Nathan Proctor, US Public Interest Research Groups' senior right-to-repair campaign director, in [16]a statement .
[17]
"We’ve been close in several other states, only to have manufacturer opposition stall our progress. And we aren’t done yet. We know that farmers also need to fix their tractors, and people need to fix home appliances. We know we can overcome the opposition and win results for people who just want to fix their stuff."
On Thursday, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed [18]HB22-1031 , which gives people in the state the right to repair electric wheelchairs. ®
Get our [19]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2021/S4104
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/01/california_repair_bill/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YprY39lSilT3H1GnRhjAmAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YprY39lSilT3H1GnRhjAmAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YprY39lSilT3H1GnRhjAmAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.ifixit.com/News/60893/new-york-passes-worlds-first-electronics-right-to-repair-law
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YprY39lSilT3H1GnRhjAmAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/01/california_repair_bill/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/20/framework_modular_laptop_gets_a/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/28/apple_selfservice_slammed/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/27/apple_self_repair_service_launches/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/27/apple_self_repair_service_launches/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/28/apple_selfservice_slammed/
[14] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/25/technology/personaltech/apple-repair-program-iphone.html
[15] https://www.theverge.com/2022/5/21/23079058/apple-self-service-iphone-repair-kit-hands-on
[16] https://uspirg.org/news/usp/statement-right-repair-passes-new-york-state
[17] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YprY39lSilT3H1GnRhjAmAAAAAY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[18] http://leg.colorado.gov/bills/hb22-1031
[19] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Look forward to more clunky devices, but...
For those of us with the knack for repair, this is great.
The pressure for decades has been for devices and components that are as compact and light as possible. That's going to have to be compromised.
The right to repair is a legal thing.
They'll sell you parts and info at a fair price....
Doesn't mean the thing is practically repairable...
You really think you can replace that M1-Ultra? and have it work? For how long? And how much is that M1-Ultra? Purchased in thousands, it's probably sorta OK - but thousands will cost quite a substantial sum, but one by one to an individual?
Yes, it's a legal thing but if it is in any way effective it will limit what companies can produce, or at least sell. The trick is to get the balance right so that measures intended to limit reparability (like, say, welding the case shut) are banned but design features that are intended to improve the product (like welding the case shut) aren't. You see the problem. I'm no lawyer, and obviously I haven't read the New York law, so I can say how well (or even if) it addresses this but it something that right to repair laws need to do.
Great, but. I wonder how-effectively it'll be enforced
I expect footdragging, passive-aggressive, fake-cooperation from the manufacturers.
Manufacturer: "Here's the repair manual!". End-user: "There's no table of contents, no index, and some diagrams of what appear to be a completely different product." Mfr.: "So sorry, that'll be fixed in the next release." Three (or seven, or thirteen months later ...) "Rev 1.1 manual is now out!" End-user: "The TOC and index are here, but are mostly-wrong. Some diagrams are missing, and some part numbers look wrong." Mfr.: "So sorry, we'll fix that in the next release." Ad infinitum.
Meanwhile, the manufacturer crows, "Look, Mr/Ms Regulator: we're complying! See our website! Everything you need is here!"
(Icon for mfr. proclaiming "compliance".)
A start
While the list of exceptions excludes more than it should, it's a good start.
I would guess that as one of the top five agricultural states Big Green (Deere) had something to say about farm machinery but I'm not at all sure who lobbied for the exclusion of appliances.