46 years after the UN proclaimed the right to join a union, Microsoft sort of agrees
- Reference: 1654237745
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/06/03/microsoft_principles_for_employee_organizing/
- Source link:
And on June 2, 2022, Microsoft president and vice-chair Brad Smith [2]blogged that the company has adopted four "principles for employee organizing and engagement with labor organizations", one of which is "We recognize that employees have a legal right to choose whether to form or join a union."
Microsoft was founded on April 4, 1975 so has had 16,872 days to consider the Covenant.
[3]
Better late than never, we suppose.
[4]
[5]
Smith's post states that Microsoft has noticed "Recent unionization campaigns across the country – including in the tech sector" and concluded "that inevitably these issues will touch on more businesses, potentially including our own.
"This has encouraged us to think proactively about the best approach for our employees, shareholders, customers, and other stakeholders."
[6]
We reiterate that the right to organize has been internationally recognized since 1976. We'll leave it to readers to judge the extent of Microsoft's proactivity.
Smith's post outlines three more principles, namely:
We believe in the importance of listening to our employees' concerns;
We are committed to creative and collaborative approaches with unions when employees wish to exercise their rights and Microsoft is presented with a specific unionization proposal;
Building on our global labor experiences, we are dedicated to maintaining a close relationship and shared partnership with all our employees, including those represented by a union.
Smith makes many references to Microsoft having a lot to learn about working with unions, plus a sincere intention to do it well.
"We acknowledge that this is a journey, and we will need to continue to learn and change as employee expectations and views change with the world around us," Smith writes. "And we recognize that employers and employees will not always agree on all topics – and that is okay."
Smith also admits "we have far more learning ahead of us than behind us."
[7]
His post also declares: "Our employees will never need to organize to have a dialogue with Microsoft's leaders."
[8]Tech hiring freeze doesn't mean people won't leave
[9]One in five employees at top Indian outsourcers left in the past year
[10]Russian IT pros flee Putin, says tech lobby group
[11]Indian government accuses Uber of jacking up prices for loyal customers
But employees have previously expressed the opinion that Microsoft's leaders don't listen.
In February 2021 we [12]reported the contempt some Microsoft staff have for the company's annual employee survey, which many staff feel is ignored. And who could forget Microsoft's [13]hated "stack ranking" system that saw management pit staff against each other.
Why has Microsoft decided now is the time to open itself to unions? Perhaps the looming acquisition of Activision, [14]where staff are already organizing , is one reason. Microsoft has doubtless seen staff at [15]Apple and [16]Amazon work towards establishing unions.
Whatever the reason, many of Microsoft's staff know that their technical skills mean they can easily find new jobs at other tech firms, often scoring substantial pay rises along the way. But not all of Microsoft's 181,000 staff (as of June 30, 2021) are so lucky. Smith's post will be very resonant for thousands of staff around the world.
And it might have been more so, if Smith or his predecessors had written it decades ago. ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights
[2] https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2022/06/02/employee-organizing-engagement-labor-economy/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Ypnbxizy3Shit7JAZaZPPQAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Ypnbxizy3Shit7JAZaZPPQAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Ypnbxizy3Shit7JAZaZPPQAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Ypnbxizy3Shit7JAZaZPPQAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Ypnbxizy3Shit7JAZaZPPQAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/06/02/tech_layoff_hiring/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/03/attrition_tcs_wipro_infosys_hcl/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/23/russia_it_pro_exodus/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/11/indian_government_ridesharing_regulation_crackdown/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/23/mspoll_2021/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2013/11/12/microsoft_kills_stack_ranking_reviews/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2022/05/26/activision_union_staffing/
[15] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/21/apple_atlanta_union/
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/05/amazon_chat_app/
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Why companies feel the need to setup and join trade and lobbying associations...
.... to protect their interests, while employee should not do the same in their own interests?
There is an Italian saying that roughly translated is "clear pacts, long friendship". Just to achieve that one side can't have all the bargaining power.
The only problem with unions is they can end in the hands of political activists with their own agenda, or their leader captured by company money (or other benefits), and it's up to the workers to avoid that keeping an open eye on what they do. It's just like politicians, if you put and leave crooks at the top, you can't complain if they exploit you.
That US is coming now where most European countries arrived a century ago, well before the UN document, is quite appalling.
"Our employees will never need to organize to have a dialogue with Microsoft's leaders."
No, of course not. They can go to their manager's office and be told to get back to work on their own.
I think this paints an overly gloomy picture. I'm just one engineer, and I'm not in the US, but here's my experience.
I'm 8 levels below Satya. I haven't felt the need, but I'm confident that if I called or messaged any of my managers from the 1st level down, I'd get a meaningful reply. We're actively encouraged to do so. Nothing against Satya either. Maybe he would reply, but I think it would be unfair to expect it. I'm personally known by all from the 3rd level down. The most senior of these is based in my office. We haven't spoken much, but he said "hey" to me the other day, addressing me by my nickname. I was so pleasantly surprised that I only managed a barely audilble "hey" in response! Bear in mind this guy has thousands of people under him. I doubt many in other large organisations could say they are known so far up the chain.
I can't say I agree with everything that Microsoft does, as that's almost inevitable in a company this large, but when it comes to how they treat me as an employee, I have no issues at all.
It's not all about you.
A necessary evil
When the great unwashed masses feel they need unions to protect themselves, then management is doing something very wrong.
I'm not a fan of unions but my opinion of management is even lower.
If they were to treat their underlings with respect, a decent wage and decent working conditions, then there would be no need to form a union.
When workers seek to unionise, this should be seen as a major indictment on management.