Inkscape adds multi-page support with v1.2 update
- Reference: 1652794206
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/05/17/inkscape_1_2/
- Source link:
[1]
Multipage update plus merged Layers and Object dialog
"This is one of the features that Inkscapers have been clamoring for over the past few years," the team [2]acknowledged , and the functionality works well. It's possible to create standard or custom-sized pages in the same document, give them names, arrange them, and export them.
Other updates include improvements to the color palette and a merged Layers and Object dialog. A new Live Path Effect (or, as the Inkscape team humorously put it, "Tiled Clones dialog on steroids") permits a vast array of tiling types when copying large numbers of object and there are new modes of on-canvas snapping to ease alignment.
Finally, there is an improved gradient editor and the ability to fiddle with markers on the end of a line.
Fixes include consistency in unit conversions and stop positions in percentages in gradients. The annoying console pop-up on Windows when calling external utilities is also hidden.
[3]Zorin OS 16 Pro arrives complete with optional 'Windows 11' desktop
[4]helloSystem: Pre-alpha FreeBSD project chases simplicity and elegance by taking cues from macOS
[5]It's powered by a mega-corp AI, it has a Liquid Mode, but it's not a T-1000. It's Adobe's PDF auto-reflow for mobile
[6]Started from the bottom, now we're near: 16 years on, open-source vector graphics editor Inkscape draws close to v1.0
While the [7]release notes feature a raft of other improvements, including better integration with macOS and a .dmg file for M1 users, multiple pages remove a gaping hole in the tool's functionality.
Which, of course, brings us to the question of competition. After its [8]initial 1.0 release , Inkscape seems to be settling into an annual cadence and with each iteration has perhaps narrowed the gap on the likes of Adobe Illustrator.
Should Adobe be worried?
While a glance over its shoulder would be advisable, we spoke to some creative types who told us they had no plans to give up their Creative Cloud subscriptions any time soon.
However, Inkscape's improved macOS integration gave some pause for thought (as well as other new toys), particularly considering the $20.99 per month starting price for Illustrator. Creative Cloud starts at $54.99/month and both require an annual commitment for those prices.
[9]
That said, one designer told The Register of Adobe: "It's the industry standard," thus demonstrating the challenge Inkscape faces despite being both free and cross-platform.
[10]
While we used Windows to take a look at 1.2, a Linux version is also available as well as macOS. ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2022/05/17/inkscape4.jpg
[2] https://inkscape.org/news/2022/05/16/inkscape-12/
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/10/zorin_os_16_pro/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/12/freebsd_that_looks_like_macos/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/24/adobe_liquid_mode_pdf_mobile/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2020/04/14/16_years_inkscape_v1/
[7] https://media.inkscape.org/media/doc/release_notes/1.2/Inkscape_1.2.html
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2020/05/06/inkscape_v1/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YoPGpqdBurwiem1D3xmEFwAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YoPGpqdBurwiem1D3xmEFwAAAIQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Hmmm
All of them, because you can't possibly design on some other sort of the machine! The Mac makes the designer they'd be rubbish on any other computer
Re: Hmmm
Personally I use the affinity suite of products (photo, designer and publisher) for my needs in this line.
No commercial interest just a user who likes the products.
Adobe is just one of those “standard” packages but at £55 month for the full set is not for anyone casually wanting to use something.
Re: Hmmm
We're in the process of standardising on the Affinity suite in the company too as our security guys have been looking at just how much data leaks via the use of Adobe. Apparently it doesn't just affect the users, but also website visitors because Typekit very much behaves like Google fonts. Ergo, it got nixed.
I suspect the fact that we're sacing a fortune on license fees helped, but the designers had to adjust a bit.
Fingers crossed
My current Inkscape has introduced an incredibly anti-productive bug, in that it insists on stretching stroke widths when stretching an object, even though that is deselected. It doesn't stretch thicken the stroke as much, though - just enough to screw your productivity. I do hope this new version fixes it.
The big problem The Gimp bitmap editor faces is that four-colour separation for print jobs is patented and the owner (Adobe?) refuse to license it to the project. I don't know if Inkscape suffers the same problem with vector formats.
Re: Fingers crossed
-> The big problem The Gimp bitmap editor faces is that four-colour separation for print jobs is patented and the owner (Adobe?) refuse to license it to the project
Is that right? Four colour printing existed long before Adobe. Or is this some 'American patent', which means that they stick a stars and stripe sticker on something that somebody else somewhere else has already done?
TIFF was industry-standard at one point.
As was .doc (not .docx).
As was .bmp
As was .wav
As was .rm
As was WordPerfect
As was Lotus 1-2-3
As was .gif for static images
As was MPEG-1, then MPEG-2...
As was .pcx
....
....
Progress happens.
Still doesn't have a built in update facility. Uninstalling the app and only then being able to install the new version is a very outdated concept, and a bit of a mare for those of us who run networks!
Hmmm
Quark was dominant in the DTP world until Adobe came along with InDesign. It was a better product, had better support, a cheaper price tag and better integration with other products.
Hubris brings the mighty down.
And how much do we love Adobe and their Creative Cloud?
How many designers are still clinging onto their Mac Pro running an CS5 on a version of the Mac OS that is no longer supported?