At last, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.0 slips out
- Reference: 1652212410
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/05/10/red_hat_enterprise_linux_9/
- Source link:
This release aims to roll out features and functionality without being too different from its older siblings.
[1]Version 9 represents a number of firsts. It's the first major release since [2]IBM's acquisition of Red Hat concluded in July 2019 – RHEL 8.0 came out two months before. It's also the first major version of the enterprise distribution since Red Hat redefined its free enterprise distro CentOS as being [3]upstream of RHEL rather than a rebuild of it.
[4]
The Reg [5]looked at the beta last year. This release is [6]based on Fedora 34, which we [7]covered in March last year. That means several significant changes for desktop users, including GNOME 40, which should run on Wayland by default, the Pipewire audio server, and incremental updates to Flatpak packages.
[8]Skipping CentOS Stream? AlmaLinux 9 Beta is here
[9]Red Hat gets RHEL 8.2 certified for high level US government security
[10]Next versions of both Fedora and Ubuntu head into beta
[11]Linux Mint Debian Edition 5 is here
The release uses kernel 5.14, systemd 249, Python 3.9, PHP 8, and GCC 11.2. It [12]includes a web console based on the [13]Cockpit project, and this now supports live patching of the running kernel using the [14]kpatch tool. There's also a container-management toolbox, based on the upstream [15]toolbx project.
As we noted when looking at [16]Linux app packaging last year, Flatpak remains a primarily desktop-centric format, unlike Ubuntu's Snap format which is aimed at both desktop and server, in our view. As most RHEL 9 deployments will probably be on servers, containers will be more significant for app deployment. The new version has significant [17]changes to container handling, including cgroups version 2 and the use of crun as the default container runtime.
[18]
RHEL is a relatively slow-moving, technologically conservative distro. As with any long-term supported distro, this can cause issues when you need newer versions of core components.
Red Hat's solution to this is what it calls [19]Application Streams , which allows specific versions of components of the OS to be installed along with their various dependencies. These receive more frequent updates than the underlying core OS, although that can mean shorter supported lifetimes.
[20]
Pricing [21]starts at $179 for the [22]workstation edition, if you can live without support, and $299 with one year of support. The most basic [23]server edition starts at $349 without support, $799 with a year of standard (business hours) support, and $1,299 for premium (24×7) support for severity 1 and 2 cases.
Assuming that Red Hat follows the existing [24]life cycle , RHEL 9.0 will receive full support for the next five years, taking it up to mid-2027, followed by a further five years of "maintenance" support – meaning no new features and limited additional support for new hardware. ®
Get our [25]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-defines-new-epicenter-innovation-red-hat-enterprise-linux-9
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2018/10/28/ibm_redhat_acquisition/
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/09/centos_red_hat/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YnrgiRhFrJSgAEXd93MP4gAAAAM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/04/rhel_9_beta/
[6] https://access.redhat.com/discussions/6162882
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/17/fedora_34_preview/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/20/almalinux_9_beta/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/05/red_hat_gets_rhel_82/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/31/fedora_and_ubuntu_36/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/19/linux_mint_debian_edition_5/
[12] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html-single/managing_systems_using_the_rhel_9_web_console/index
[13] https://cockpit-project.org/
[14] https://github.com/dynup/kpatch
[15] https://containertoolbx.org/
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/26/linux_software_installation/
[17] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_9/assembly_containers_considerations-in-adopting-rhel-9
[18] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YnrgiRhFrJSgAEXd93MP4gAAAAM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[19] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/9-beta/html/considerations_in_adopting_rhel_9/ref_application-streams_considerations-in-adopting-rhel-9
[20] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/oses&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YnrgiRhFrJSgAEXd93MP4gAAAAM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[21] https://www.redhat.com/en/store/linux-platforms
[22] https://www.redhat.com/en/store/red-hat-enterprise-linux-workstation
[23] https://www.redhat.com/en/store/red-hat-enterprise-linux-server
[24] https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata
[25] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Downstream?
Alma aim for 48 hours, I've not seen them miss that yet, they've shipped 9beta for a while so they've got the process in place. Rocky aren't normally far behind. So far both have been light years ahead of where CentOS were with 7 or 8 releases.
Looking on Red Hat's site I can't see the download for 9 being available, just a "we've announced 9" and they're still offering 9Beta for download.
What I did notice is the release of 8.6 today. So the clock is ticking to see whether Alma manage Thursday, again they've been offering 8.6 beta for a short while so I guess they've got the process in place.
How do you like them apples?
-> Pricing starts at $179 for the workstation edition, if you can live without support, and $299 with one year of support. The most basic server edition starts at $349 without support, $799 with a year of standard (business hours) support, and $1,299 for premium (24×7) support for severity 1 and 2 cases.
$179 or $349 for an ISO image. Or $299 for a 1 year desktop subscription. Ha ha ha ha ha. I really wonder who buys this stuff. On the server, maybe it's reasonable to satisfy certain support requirements. But for a desktop they want $299 per year. It's free as in speech and not as in beer. Well you didn't need to explain that to me.
How much is an Oracle Solaris licence with one year of premium support for non-Oracle hardware? 4 sockets £713.
Tell me again about how good a deal this is, and for who. The next time we read about some essential part of Linux infrastructure (let's call it that) which doesn't have enough funding, why not buy a support contract from them?
Re: How do you like them apples?
Sign up for the dev account, it's free as in beer and these days you can run quite few systems on it.
Downstream?
What's the timeline look like on this for some of the newer downstream projects like Rocky and Alma?