DARPA says US hypersonic missile is ready for real world
- Reference: 1649266978
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/04/06/darpa_hypersonic_missile/
- Source link:
DARPA has been testing hypersonic weapons for several years. The program in question, called the Hypersonic Air-breathing Weapon Concept ( [1]HAWC ), began [2]in 2016 with Raytheon as a partner. Raytheon's HAWC first flew in 2021, and this latest test used a design manufactured by Lockheed Martin and Aerojet Rocketdyne.
Hypersonic weapons are any missile that travels at Mach 5 or faster, but with an added caveat: they can be controlled. Traditional missiles often exceed Mach 5 as well, but can't be steered once they're launched.
[3]
Both of the HAWCs that DARPA tested were considered cruise missiles because they include air-breathing engines like jet aircraft. This test, which DARPA didn't specify a date, target or parameters for, traveled for more than 300 nautical miles at an altitude over 65,000 feet (twice the height of a commercial airline flight). Andrew "Tippy" Knoedler, HAWC project manager at DARPA, said that this second flight, with a completely different design, means the concept is ready for the battlefield.
[4]
[5]
"These achievements increase the level of technical maturity for transitioning HAWC to a service program of record … We are still analyzing flight test data, but are confident that we will provide the US Air Force and Navy with excellent options to diversify the technology available for their future missions," Knoedler [6]said .
Hypersonics increasingly on the world stage
DARPA's announcement was followed a day later by news that the US, UK and Australia have [7]partnered to develop hypersonic weapons. US military leaders have said Russia used multiple hypersonic missiles in Ukraine, and the Russian military has made additional claims that it has hypersonic missiles capable of traveling 27 times the speed of sound, as well as a Mach 10 missile with a 1,250-mile range.
[8]Hypersonic cruise missile scores US$175m DARPA cash
[9]North Korea says it's launched a third hypersonic missile, this time reaching Mach 10
[10]China's hypersonic glider didn't just orbit Earth, it 'fired a missile' while at Mach 5
[11]US Air Force announces plan to assassinate molluscs with hypersonic missile
China quickly responded to the partnership announcement, [12]saying that jointly-developed hypersonic weapons could trigger conflict in the APAC region. China is also said to be developing its own hypersonic weapons.
Along with their long range, target-avoidance and uncatchable speeds, hypersonic weapons could also deliver devastation without a payload, given enough speed and mass. Research done into hypersonic kinetic impact missiles found that, if DARPA could get its maximum designed 5,500 kg payload onto its rocket and get it up to Mach 20, it could release the equivalent of [13]31 tons of TNT .
While this may not seem a lot in the nuclear age, "its effects still would far exceed present conventional capabilities," said USSOCOM CWMD analyst Daniel Sproull. ®
Get our [14]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.darpa.mil/program/hypersonic-air-breathing-weapon-concept
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2016/11/01/darpa_signs_off_us175_million_for_another_hypersonic_project/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Yk4NmcEsGG5qvu6KoseTzQAAABU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yk4NmcEsGG5qvu6KoseTzQAAABU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Yk4NmcEsGG5qvu6KoseTzQAAABU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2022-04-05
[7] https://www.npr.org/2022/04/06/1091194471/australia-u-k-u-s-hypersonic-missiles
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2016/11/01/darpa_signs_off_us175_million_for_another_hypersonic_project/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/12/north_korea_hypersonic_missile/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/23/china_hypersonic_glider/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/22/usaf_snail_clam_missile_plan/
[12] https://www.reuters.com/world/hypersonic-weapons-deal-china-warns-against-fueling-crisis-2022-04-05/
[13] https://thesimonscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/IAJ-8-2-2017-pg62-68.pdf
[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Sooo...
They've tested two completely different designs for one flight each that they have admitted to , and consider that this comprises a battle-ready system...?
There, FTFY
And the answer to that question might well be 'Yes", if indeed they have many more flights logged than they are admitting to.
Hmm, Russian Zirkon can reach Mach 8 and is fully operable. Seem that USA just needed to show that they have __something__ at least.
But the USA have 2 missiles that can do Mach5 - so that's Mach10 which is 2Machs better
Sorry, but...
Anyone can aim a rocket low and call it a hypersonic weapon. An air breather hypersonic is a whole 'nother animal.
Missile Gap
The new "missile gap." Next will be a "bomber gap." So 1960's...
Re: Missile Gap
Or the anti missile missile gap, the counter measure you use to shoot it down has to be going a bit faster
Dated?
I always wonder when I read stories like this how many years ago the press release was written. Hard to believe they would actually be announcing something that is current, but maybe we need to show how far behind we are to get more pork - er, sorry, funding.
Re: Dated?
It can't have been otherwise the USA could have used it to defeat the Taliban and avoid a humiliating retreat from Afghanistan.
If they had a hypersonic missile then they would obviously have won.
Optional warhead
The article states that just the kinetic energy of a lump of metal travelling at greater than Mach5 is equivalent to several tonnes of TNT. I recall that during the Falklands conflict one of the UK's ships was destroyed by an Exocet missile whose warhead failed to detonate, it was the heat of the engine and the unspent fuel that set the ship ablaze.
Technically in order to be a munition, a flying, guided object needs to have a warhead, otherwise it is 'just' a controlled craft, and not subject to arms controls.* one of my former colleagues had a radio-controlled model aircraft, jet propelled, which was so fast he needed a proper runway to fly from as it would quickly escape radio contact when in flight if he couldn't see it.
*This may no longer be the case, please advise if you know better. Obviously ballistic objects like bullets are legally munitions.
Sooo...
They've tested two completely different designs for one flight each, and consider that this comprises a battle-ready system...?
I'm no military expert, but this sounds just a trifle optimistic to me.