News: 1649158305

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

US, UK, and Western Europe fail to hit top 50 cheapest broadband list

(2022/04/05)


In an [1]analysis of 3,356 fixed-line broadband deals in 220 countries, price comparison website [2]Cable.co.uk found that the UK has the 92nd cheapest internet, beating the US, which came in 134th place.

Based on 41 packages, the average cost per month for broadband in Britain came in at $39.01. Stateside, this rose to $55, from 34 packages measured.

For these bulwarks of western democracy, 92nd and 134th place isn't particularly impressive. But if you really want to shave the dollars off your internet bill, you have a number of options.

[3]

Syria [4]once again came in at number one for cheapest broadband at an average $2.15 per month. This was followed by Sudan at $4.80. In third was Belarus at $7.40, and fourth was Ukraine at $7.40.

[5]

[6]

Now, forgive us if we're wrong, but there appears to be a common tie between the countries with the cheapest broadband – they are all currently difficult places to live.

Syria's rock-bottom prices were due to its depreciated currency. Only 50 percent of the population has access to internet, said Cable.co.uk, and – lest we forget – there's still the civil war, going strong since 2011.

[7]

Also no stranger to civil war, Sudan's internet access is limited to its urban areas and fixed-line services are slow, Cable.co.uk said. Only a third of the population are online.

In contrast, 85 percent of Belarus is connected, and the Eastern European country has been heavily investing in its IT sector and full-fiber networks. The only problem is that Belarus is Belarus, run by Russian president Vladimir Putin's best buddy and "Europe's last dictator" [8]Alexander Lukashenko .

Interestingly, Cable.co.uk said of number four: "Ukraine's internet packages are cheap, and also very fast, as a result of a well-developed fibre infrastructure. Urban residents benefit from better connectivity than those in rural areas."

[9]AMD to acquire SmartNIC and networking firm Pensando for $1.9 billion

[10]BT must 'prioritize' between 'shareholders and workers' says union boss

[11]Hooking up to Starlink might be pricier than you thought

[12]How legacy IPv6 addresses can spoil your network privacy

In the understatement of the week, the analyst added: "Obviously, things are changing fast in the country." Whether there will be much left of the infrastructure once Putin's war concludes remains to be seen. Of course, rounding out the top five was Russia at $8.07.

At the other end of the scale, Burundi in East Africa was most expensive at an astonishing $429.95 per month followed by Sierra Leone ($316.69), Brunei Darussalam in Borneo ($258.42), British Virgin Islands ($184), and Turks and Caicos Islands (£170.50).

[13]

If it's any consolation to Brits, not a single country within Western Europe ranked in the top 50, but Italy ($27.70), Germany ($27.81), and France ($28.92) were all cheaper. Likewise, all countries in North America were in the bottom half of the table.

Dan Howdle, consumer telecoms analyst at Cable.co.uk, commented: "This year we have noticed a greater weighting towards currency devaluation in the top half of the table. For example, first-place Syria, whose Syrian Pound has lost three-quarters of its value against the US dollar in the last 12 months.

"Island nations such as those in the Caribbean and Oceania continue to present problems when it comes to providing cheap, fast connectivity options. Those lucky enough to have an undersea cable running close by tend to be able to offer it, where others have to lean into pricier hybrid satellite, 4G and/or WiMAX solutions. It's hard to see how more affordable connectivity for the general population will be coming anytime soon to those countries at the bottom of the table, plagued as they are with limitations that are geographical and geopolitical, and where there is a lack of desire in the marketplace for fixed-line broadband solutions."

All of which goes to show that, based on economic and geopolitical matters, you want the country where you live to be around the middle of the table rather than the top. ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.cable.co.uk/broadband/pricing/worldwide-comparison/

[2] https://www.cable.co.uk/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YkxntF2CCfZfV04JxPiN8wAAABQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/21/global_broadband_pricing_league_table_2020/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YkxntF2CCfZfV04JxPiN8wAAABQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YkxntF2CCfZfV04JxPiN8wAAABQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YkxntF2CCfZfV04JxPiN8wAAABQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2017/08/31/belarus_war_with_pretend_country/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/04/amd_acquires_pensando/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/30/bt_union_pay_rise/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/23/starlink_spacex_spendy/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/22/legacy_ipv6_addressing_standard_enables/

[13] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YkxntF2CCfZfV04JxPiN8wAAABQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Some services overseas

VoiceOfTruth

I have travelled a fair bit and I do see some better services offered overseas compared to what we have here in Blighty. For example data packages which are 'in country' or 'external' - for some countries external connectivity is more expensive. Some mobile phone company apps overseas makes Three's look like a 1st version from 20 years ago. And banking - an sms every time I use my card (or rather every time my card is used).

I'm happy with the Three unlimited data offering. Why bother with ADSL these days?

France ($28.92)

heyrick

Hmmm. My phone+mobile+internet package costs €67 a month. There are cheaper options but being rural I want the phone line and ISP to be the same. Dumb farmers finding intriguing ways to smash the line is an annual event...

On the plus side, from my landline I can call landlines in most of the world for free. Almost a shame I'm an introvert and don't make use of that...

Withour a purchase power comparison it means little

LDS

Also the people building and running the systems cost less in the same countries. There could be also hidden costs. In Italy the battle between ISPs brought the prices down - but the try to recover some profits trying to hinder people buy the packages without the modem/routers include (ignoring the directive mandating their availability) which may be paid separately, and/or trying to lock people in into multi-year contracts with activation fees monthly payments, and the like.

Re: Withour a purchase power comparison it means little

Dale 3

Exactly. The cheapest country supposedly is Syria ($2.15). Their average monthly broadband package is 5500 in their local currency, against an annual average salary of 149000 (according to SalaryExplorer), giving 3.7% of annual salary. In the UK the monthly average is 29.66 against annual average salary of 71000, which is 0.4% of annual salary. Even putting aside arguments about how representative the various averages may be in real life, there is still an order of magnitude difference.

The only time this list is beneficial is if you are a global traveller who earns in one currency and pays local rates for access as you go.

#4. Ukraine

DevOpsTimothyC

I'm surprised that they are #4. Price wise it's a little hard to beat a FREE Starlink connection.

Chalk and cheese

Pete 2

So is this survey for the same quality of service? The same bandwidth? The same data caps?

Or does it vary from a 1MBit/s Wimax in a rural domain to a 1GBit/s FTTH in the most expensive cities in the world.

It seems to me that these variations are in line with the (lower) cost of equipment in countries with lower abilities to buy top quality kit when compared with those that prohibit cheapo hardware on the basis that a foreign power might be eavesdropping. Also that the cost of installing infrastructure is heavily dependent on local labour costs - which also vary enormously.

Re: Chalk and cheese

katrinab

Some of them are satellite services (and I'm not talking about Starlink here) that are a lot slower than 1MBit/s

Germany isn't that cheap

johnfbw

I pay approx 30% more in Germany than I did in the UK and I get locked in to a 2 year contract (auto renewing for a decade if you don't sacrifice a goat on the third full moon before contract expiry)

PPP anyone?

Charlie Clark

If the price comparison is solely based on exchange rates then it is inherently flawed. There is the concept of "purchasing power parity" which is supposed to mitigate exchange rate effects by comparing the price of similar products in local currency around the world. There are flaws in this, too, but it's often useful, especially when comparing what are average wages and what can be bought with them. The lower the average wage, the cheaper services will seem in comparison, but PPP can correct this to show that some things are in fact more expensive.

Of course, broadband costs are based on a mixture of high capital costs to build the network – the higher the penetration, the higher the cost – and lower wage and fixed costs to sell (got to have sales and marketing) and maintain it, plus some variable costs related to interconnection and peering charges. So you need to reflect those in any comparison.

War tends to play hell with infrastructure and telecoms is no exception. While they weren't murdering and raping, Putin's Chechens were also destroying and looting whatever they could take with them: copper cables being one of the favourites.

But elsewhere in the country, and relevant for the comparison, it seems that [1]Ukraine benefits from having lots of internet service providers . Apparently, this might have something to do with competition. Just don't mention this to the FCC which is happy to see monopolies in the US…

[1] https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2022/03/26/the-degrading-treatment-of-ukraines-internet

Have you ever felt like a wounded cow
halfway between an oven and a pasture?
walking in a trance toward a pregnant
seventeen-year-old housewife's
two-day-old cookbook?
-- Richard Brautigan