News: 1649095330

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Intel CEO made $178m in first 9 months, AMD CEO got a $2m pay rise

(2022/04/04)


In a sign of how badly Intel's board wanted Pat Gelsinger to turn around the storied chipmaker, the company paid the new CEO a whopping $178 million in total compensation last year for his first nine or so months on the job. That is nearly eight times what former CEO Bob Swan made in 2020.

The semiconductor giant released the 2021 compensation details of Gelsinger and its other top executives in a [1]proxy statement filed March 30 with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Rival AMD released 2021 compensation details for its top executives in a [2]proxy statement a day later, showing that CEO Lisa Su increased her total compensation by a couple million dollars last year – from $27.14 million to $29.5 million.

[3]

[4]Gelsinger became Intel's CEO on February 15, 2021, after pitching the company's board of directors on a turnaround plan that included a massive increase in capital expenditures to put up new fabs, which will, in part, support the company's revitalized contract manufacturing business.

[5]

[6]

For his nine-and-a-half months of work in 2021, Gelsinger received a nearly $1.1 million base salary, a $1.7 million bonus, $169.5 million in stock awards, $5.1 million in non-equity incentive cash, $685,000 in increased pension value that carried over from his previous 30 years at Intel, and $401,600 in other forms of compensation, which included retirement plan contributions, company-provided transportation and residential security.

With Gelsinger's $178 million in total compensation for 2021, the ratio of pay for CEO to median employee was 1,711 to 1, with the median Intel employee earning $104,400 in 2021. By contrast, Intel's CEO-to-employee pay ratio was 695 to 1 during Swan's last full year as CEO in 2020.

[7]

However, a majority of the $169.5 million in stock awards Gelsinger received last year are currently worthless and will remain that way unless Intel's stock price significantly increases over the next few years. This applies to more than 60 percent of last year's stock awards, and they require Intel's stock price to increase 200 percent over a five-year period for Gelsinger to vest the full amount.

"The package requires substantial stockholder value creation in order to realize its targeted value," Intel said in its new proxy statement.

If you've been following Intel's stock movements lately, you'll know that this means Gelsinger is in for quite a challenge if he wants to cash out on all his shares. The company's stock price is currently down about 20 percent from when he started, showing that Gelsinger has plenty of work to do in convincing the company that Intel is worth much more than it currently is.

[8]

[9]Investors did not respond well to Intel's disclosure in February that Gelsinger's costly manufacturing expansion will drag down gross margins for a few years and make Intel free cash flow negative for the first time in three decades. The day following that disclosure, Intel's shares went down 6.4 percent. Gelsinger later pointed to Wall Street's negative response as evidence that his company is worthy of receiving part of the [10]$52 billion in US subsidies that await approval in Congress.

We should point out, [11]as others have , that Gelsinger, an evangelical Christian, has previously said that he donates roughly half of his earnings to charity. But if Gelsinger can prove his naysayers wrong and elevate Intel to a new level in the Wall Street pantheon, his total compensation will represent an astonishing amount of money for one human being to accumulate over a relatively small period.

Compensation for Intel's other top execs

Elsewhere in Intel's new proxy statement are interesting historical artifacts thanks to the fact that four of the six top paid executives listed in the document have left the company.

This includes the recently departed CFO George Davis, General Counsel Steven Rodgers, and Client Computing Group boss Gregory Bryant. The fourth former executive on the list is Navin Shenoy, the ex-data center boss [12]who was fired last summer (Intel made the nature of Shenoy's departure clear in the proxy statement by calling it an "involuntary termination").

Swan, the former CEO, is also on the list, though he earned significantly less than previous years because he only served as chief executive for the first month and a half of 2021 before Gelsinger swooped in. Swan's total compensation for 2021 was $605,300, which consisted of $156,300 in base salary and $449,000 in other compensation, the majority of which came from unused vacation and sabbatical time as well as company-provided transportation.

Besides Gelsinger, the only other currently employed Intel executive on the list is Sandra Rivera, who took over Shenoy's responsibilities as general manager of the Datacenter and AI Group last summer. The division was reconfigured from the previously named Data Platform Group as part of a restructuring that was enacted by Gelsinger in mid-2021.

Here's how Intel's top executives stacked up for total pay in 2021:

2021 Total Compensation

Sorted By Total Pay

Name

Salary

Bonus

Stock Awards

Option Awards

Non-Equity Incentive Pay

Change In Pension Value, Etc.

All Other Compensation

Total

Pat Gelsinger

$1,098,500

$1,750,000

$140,433,000

$29,108,400

$5,113,900

$685,000

$401,600

$178,590,400

Navin Shenoy

$450,800

None

$8,378,000

None

$63,200

None

$2,203,800

$11,095,800

George Davis

$925,000

$1,000,000

$6,641,200

None

$2,315,400

None

$43,400

$10,925,000

Steven Rodgers

$850,000

None

$6,539,000

None

$2,313,700

None

$739,900

$10,442,600

Gregory Bryant

$750,000

None

$7,662,900

None

$1,877,100

None

$142,500

$10,432,500

Sandra Rivera

$724,400

$1,000,000

$6,130,200

None

$1,813,300

None

$130,200

$9,798,100

Bob Swan

$156,300

None

None

None

None

None

$449,000

$605,300

Compensation for AMD's top execs

AMD's new proxy statement revealed that its CEO, Lisa Su, earned nearly $29.5 million for 2021 total compensation. That was $2.3 million higher than the previous year, and the boost largely came from a mix of higher stock awards and non-equity incentive cash.

This put the company's CEO-to-employee pay ratio at 230 to 1, with the median AMD employee earning $128,263 in 2021. By contrast, the ratio in 2020 was 228 to 1.

The chipmaker's four other top paid executives in 2021 consisted of the following executive vice presidents: CFO Devinder Kumar, Computing and Graphics Business Group boss Rick Bergman, Chief Sales Officer Darren Grasby and CTO Mark Papermaster.

Besides Su, the listed executives with the biggest differences in pay from the previous year were Grasby, who earned $4.8 million less because of a smaller package of stock awards that was slightly offset by a higher base salary and non-incentive pay, and Papermaster, who earned $2.3 million more because of a larger stock package and a higher base salary, non-equity incentive pay and other compensation.

Here's how all AMD's top executives compared for total pay in 2021:

2021 Total Compensation

Sorted By Total Pay

Name

Salary

Bonus

Stock Awards

Option Awards

Non-Equity Incentive Pay

All Other Compensation

Total

Lisa Su

$1,076,317

None

$19,929,804

$5,161,344

$3,190,000

$140,642

$29,498,107

Mark Papermaster

$700,388

None

$6,233,723

$1,614,391

$1,400,000

$59,929

$10,008,431

Darren Grasby

$619,565

None

$4,336,512

$1,123,039

$1,239,130

$19,517

$7,337,763

Devinder Kumar

$650,385

None

$3,902,877

$1,010,763

$1,300,000

$14,188

$6,878,213

Rick Bergman

$612,690

None

$3,686,059

$954,601

$1,225,000

$14,670

$6,493,020

Just for fun, we calculated the ratio of Gelsinger's total compensation in 2021 to the median pay of AMD's five top paid executives: It amounted to roughly 24.3 to 1. ®

Get our [13]Tech Resources



[1] https://ir.stockpr.com/intc/sec-filings-email/content/0000050863-22-000011/proxy2022.htm

[2] https://ir.stockpr.com/amd/sec-filings-email/content/0001193125-22-091792/d261716ddef14a.htm

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YktqlBE0XmBnG@JpBN1MGwAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/02/pat_gelsinger_intel_board/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YktqlBE0XmBnG@JpBN1MGwAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YktqlBE0XmBnG@JpBN1MGwAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YktqlBE0XmBnG@JpBN1MGwAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/systems&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YktqlBE0XmBnG@JpBN1MGwAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/intel-stock-sinks-after-pat-gelsinger-details-4-year-comeback-plan

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/24/intel_chips_subsidy/

[11] https://www.oregonlive.com/silicon-forest/2022/03/intel-says-it-paid-new-ceo-179-million-last-year-but-much-of-it-is-stock-thats-worthless-unless-shares-turn-around.html

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/22/intel_restructure_navin_shenoy/

[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Intel and subsidies

VoiceOfTruth

In other news: https://www.theregister.com/2022/03/24/intel_chips_subsidy/

Re: Intel and subsidies

Throatwarbler Mangrove

Congratulations . . . for failing to thoroughly read the article!

fredblogggs

'"The package requires substantial stockholder value creation in order to realize its targeted value," Intel said in its new proxy statement.'

Or substantial inflation. Doubling in 5 years reflects roughly a 14% CAGR. Given the current US inflation rate, he's already more than halfway there without doing a thing. And meanwhile the shareholders don't benefit at all from higher stock prices except by becoming ex-shareholders, while Gelsinger can manipulate the books to convince the market of whatever he wishes to feather his own nest. The board should be ashamed of themselves; this compensation structure has been proven to create perverse incentives and reward managers for outcomes unrelated to their work. Instead he should be given some number of perpetual but non-transferable dividend rights each day he works for the company. If what he builds is strong and lasting, he will reap the rewards alongside the rest of the shareholders for many years to come regardless of market fashions or macroeconomic policy. If it is all price manipulation, inflation, and short-term results at the expense of long-term profits, he will end up with little or nothing. It's especially silly in this case given that the turnaround plan consists primarily of long-term investments (usually a good idea!); Mr Gelsinger ought to have preferred such a compensation plan himself.

Anonymous Coward

What he should be given is exactly what he has been given.... so long as he can convince Apple to dump their own chips and go back to Intel.

NoneSuch

Let's get a GoFundMe going for these underpaid execs.

However do they scrape by...?

oiseau

Let's get a GoFundMe ...

Whatever for?

No need for that.

The 45+ million (+/- 5M) American citizens without any access to basic welfare services and healthcare (not to mention the homeless millions) will be the ones who help these poor souls make ends meet:

Gelsinger later pointed to Wall Street's negative response as evidence that his company is worthy of receiving part of the $52 billion in US subsidies that await approval in Congress.

Any corporation that can pay these obscene amounts of money to their CEO's needs no subsidies.

None whatsoever.

Need money to build a new fab?

Instead of giving them more tax cuts and benefits, ask the bloody shareholders to put up some of their own moolah.

That is just what they are there for, not just for cashing in dividends.

O.

Throatwarbler Mangrove

"Instead of giving them more tax cuts and benefits, ask the bloody shareholders to put up some of their own moolah.

That is just what they are there for, not just for cashing in dividends."

Hahaha . . . no. The initial investors in Intel, back in the dawn of time, created value by contributing capital to the company. The existing investors are rent-seekers, pure and simple. Welcome to Wall Street.

I had a lease on an OEDIPUS COMPLEX back in '81 ...