News: 1648740371

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Google unrolls search features to tackle misinformation

(2022/03/31)


Further embracing its unspoken role as [1]arbiter of truth , Google has unrolled some new search result features to help users "sort out what information is credible and what isn't."

In particular, the search giant is introducing two [2]new attributes : Information literacy tips for breaking topics, and a new Highly Cited label for news stories that have been widely used as sources for other news stories.

In addition to those new search features, Google also shared the expansion of its About This Result feature, which gives users information about the site hosting the result, other opinions on the topic from different sites, and additional context.

[3]

About This Result was first launched in [4]early 2021 and initially restricted to US English search results only. Google said today that it plans for the feature to "be available soon for all English-language searches worldwide."

Frontloading trusted sources

A lot of national and global news starts life at the local level, but news brands with a large reach can easily drown out the original report, which Google has said it wants to elevate in order to bring people unique perspectives.

Launching "soon" in the US (English only) and globally "in the coming weeks," the new feature adds a small "Highly Cited" label to stories showing up in the top stories area of Google search results.

[5]

[6]

"You will be able to find it on anything from an investigative article, to an interview, an announcement, a press release or a local news story, as long as other publishers indicate its relevance by linking to it," said Google Project Manager for Misinformation and Media Literacy, Nidhi Hebbar.

[7]Google loses appeal against $2.7bn EU antitrust fine for distorting competition in price comparison websites

[8]Awkward. At Chrome summit, developer asks: Why should anyone trust Google?

[9]Brave's homegrown search claims to protect your privacy but there's a long way to go if it's to challenge the big G

[10]Google experiments with user-choice-defying Android search box

It's worth remembering that a high degree of citation doesn't mean a story is true, nor does it mean the oft-cited piece is the original news item. Aiding in that fight is the second new search feature Google announced: Information literacy tips.

Starting today, Hebbar said that the page displayed when a search topic is still [11]rapidly evolving "these notices will also include tips to help you evaluate information online – reminding you that you can check whether a source is trusted on a topic, or come back later when there's more information available."

US state AGs: How can Facebook, Google, Twitter say they tackle misinformation when *gestures wildly at COVID-19 BS everywhere* [12]READ MORE

Things like determining whether a source is trustworthy and how to get good additional opinions are included along with a link to Google's page on how to [13]evaluate search results .

[14]Google's YouTube last year made a push to remove anti-vaccine videos from its service and blocked certain channels operated by several widely viewed anti-vaccine advocates. Both the video platform and sister firm Google have been widely [15]criticised over the [16]years for the inscrutability of their algorithms , with the search giant facing plenty of [17]regulatory scrutiny all over the world probing its dominance in search. ®

Get our [18]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2016/10/17/google_bosts_factivism_to_smite_thee_untruthy/

[2] https://blog.google/products/news/fact-checking-misinformation-google-features/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YkXQNhE0XmBnG@JpBN1eYgAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://blog.google/products/search/about-search-results/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YkXQNhE0XmBnG@JpBN1eYgAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/saas&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YkXQNhE0XmBnG@JpBN1eYgAAAJU&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/10/google_shopping_ecj/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/08/why_should_anyone_trust_google/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/20/brave_search/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/22/google_android_search_box_experiment/

[11] https://blog.google/products/search/new-notice-search-rapidly-evolving-results/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/24/tech_antivaxx_disinformation/

[13] https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/12003459?hl=en

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/30/youtube_expands_ban_on_vaccine/

[15] https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/congratulations-youtube-now-show-your-work/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2018/02/09/google_facebook_twitter_grilled_over_fake_news_algorithms/

[17] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/29/facebook_research_congress/

[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



An oxymoron and a half?

Mike 137

" ...two new attributes: Information literacy tips for breaking topics, and a new Highly Cited label for news stories that have been widely used as sources for other news stories "

The first, if done well, might assist in discriminating between true and false content. The second almost certainly will preferentially emphasise sensational content that circulates for that very reason, much of which may actually be more or less unreliable or false. So using the two measures together could leave the reader exactly where they were without the 'assistance'.

There's also a serious hazard that content Goooooooogle disapproves of may be branded as unreliable regardless of actual veracity.

Waste of time IMHO

Anonymous Coward

a few years back, this would have seemed like a great idea. However, there really are folk out there whose attitude is "you can prove anything with facts" and live their life accordingly.

People don't believe fairy stories because of who is telling them. They believe them because it suits them.

One of the best quotes to never really make it into the world is from the underrated "Avenue 5" ..

"I've just seen seven people stupid themselves to death."

https://ew.com/recap/avenue-5-season-1-episode-9/

THIS IS PLEDGE WEEK FOR THE FORTUNE PROGRAM

If you like the fortune program, why not support it now with your
contribution of a pithy fortunes, clean or obscene? We cannot continue
without your support. Less than 14% of all fortune users are contributors.
That means that 86% of you are getting a free ride. We can't go on like
this much longer. Federal cutbacks mean less money for fortunes, and unless
user contributions increase to make up the difference, the fortune program
will have to shut down between midnight and 8 a.m. Don't let this happen.
Mail your fortunes right now to "fortune". Just type in your favorite pithy
saying. Do it now before you forget. Our target is 300 new fortunes by the
end of the week. Don't miss out. All fortunes will be acknowledged. If you
contribute 30 fortunes or more, you will receive a free subscription to "The
Fortune Hunter", our monthly program guide. If you contribute 50 or more,
you will receive a free "Fortune Hunter" coffee mug ....