Breath of fresh air: v7.3 of LibreOffice boasts improved file importing and rendering
- Reference: 1643799612
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2022/02/02/libreoffice_7_3/
- Source link:
The new release is the latest "fresh" version. The Document Foundation also offers a "still" edition, which is based on an older but more extensively tested release; it's currently on version 7.1.8. The differences aren't that dramatic – without rehashing the release notes, these are point releases, so don't expect huge changes.
It has better support for importing Microsoft Office documents, and lots of relatively modest improvements in diagrams, charts, hyperlink support, and more. If you really push Microsoft's offering hard, LibreOffice probably isn't for you, but if like most of us you barely scratch the surface of what it can do, you will probably be fine with LibreOffice.
[2]
Users that like the "fluent" interface in modern Microsoft products can flip between the traditional layout, with a text-based menu bar and multiple repositionable toolbars, and a more modern tabbed, multi-row ribbon. It also supports a single, combined toolbar pinned at the top, and a sidebar, among other options, so there should be something to suit everyone. If, like the author, you abhor the ribbon, then the option of a traditional UI is a big win for LibreOffice – it's no longer available in rivals such as [3]OnlyOffice 7 or WPS Office.
[4]'IwlIj jachjaj! Incoming LibreOffice 7.3 to support Klingon and Interslavic
[5]Munich mk2? Germany's Schleswig-Holstein plans to switch 25,000 PCs to LibreOffice
[6]LibreOffice 7.2 brings improved but still imperfect Microsoft Office compatibility
[7]LibreOffice 7.2 release candidate reveals effort to be Microsoft-compatible
As we [8]mentioned before , there's improved language support, too.
Just for comparison, if you're still using OpenOffice – long [9]orphaned by Oracle – its current version is [10]4.1.11 . LibreOffice 4.1 was released way back in 2013, which means that OpenOffice now lags by nearly a decade. Given that it's free, there's really no strong case to be made for staying on OpenOffice.
[11]
The new version will doubtless trickle down to various Linux distributions in time, but if you're impatient, downloads are available on the LibreOffice website. The downloaded version can be installed side by side with older versions: the shiny new upstream release will appear in your app-launcher as "LibreOffice 7.3" (and "LibreOffice 7.3 Writer", etc.) alongside your distro's version. The only restriction is that you can't run old and new simultaneously. The PC version works back to Windows 7 SP1, and if you use an older Mac, version 7.3 wants macOS 10.12 "Sierra" – in both cases, newer is of course fine. ®
Get our [12]Tech Resources
[1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/7.3
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Yfq4vD3MeBbefPN@M@EQFwAAAIg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/20/onlyoffice_7/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/12/libreoffice_73/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/22/open_source_germany/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/19/libreoffce_72_native_for_apple/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/15/libreoffice_72_release_candidate/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2022/01/12/libreoffice_73/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2011/06/01/oracle_openoffice_apache/
[10] https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/announcing-apache-openoffice-4-17
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/applications&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Yfq4vD3MeBbefPN@M@EQFwAAAIg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: I will skip this one too
[Article author here]
Oh really? Do tell.
I suppose that is why there are two parallel release streams, though...
Re: I will skip this one too
Yeah, I started skipping so many versions that, I actually started to personally maintain an old Gtk+2 era version (actually OpenOffice before the fork). I have been gradually stripping bloated crap out that I don't like and it is becoming pretty lean.
I am quite happy with it. Other than Gtk+2 (I don't like Gtk+3 because the themes are gross), I have kept it building on modern platforms like OpenBSD and Linux. Perhaps one day I might formally release it as a "TraditionalOffice" fork.
I actually did the same with Gimp and a Quake III level editor. No-one else seems to be maintaining good versions of these things (in the case of Gimp, just ruining them more). So I stepped up to the plate.
7,2,5 is now showing as the more extensively tested version.
Download failed
Interesting. While reading this article I launched my LibreOffice and checked for updates. It opened the official site with a download button on the latest version, which I clicked on.
The download progresses to almost the end, then indicates Failed. No file is recorded in my Downloads folder.
Seems like they have something to correct.
Re: Download failed
All went well here, but I always download the .deb files and install manually. I did notice that it took a while to download, so I expect their servers are overloaded.
As a rule I usually skip the x.0 releases, and wait until x.2, but I'm feeling rebellious today!
Word count inconsistencies
I imagine this could be important for people who have to write to a strict word count, for me its a minor niggle.
I'm writing a book, it's currently over 300k words long, but exactly how much over 300k is a mystery, as Word, LibreOffice 7.2, LibreOffice 7.3 and Google Docs all disagree by over 1,000 words.
I'm guessing they differ in whether they count acronyms and stuff as words...
Re: Word count inconsistencies
Well, MS famously can’t count, so one of the others might be more close to being correct.
Re: Word count inconsistencies
"I'm guessing they differ in whether they count acronyms and stuff as words..."
I would believe that as well. Take an average?
Re: Word count inconsistencies
Some companies don't count some words and terms as they obviously don't exist: bug, error, faulty, patch, "bloody ribbon", Vista, Apple, insecure and the like ...
From the article
"The only restriction is that you can't run old and new simultaneously.
OK, maybe there is a totally obvious reason that I am too thick to grasp, but why would anyone want to run 2 office suites simultaneously?
Re: From the article
To compare them side by side
From the article:
Users that like the "fluent" interface in modern Microsoft products can flip between the traditional layout, with a text-based menu bar and multiple repositionable toolbars, and a more modern tabbed, multi-row ribbon. [Emphasis added]
You say that as if it were a good thing.
OK, I did see where later you said you abhor the ribbon, so you're forgiven.
I will skip this one too
I tried 7.2 and it was very bad in many ways, came back to 7.1, which is quite good (= reliable). Will update to 7.1.8 though