News: 1643036953

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Rolls-Royce consortium shopping for factory sites to build mini-nuclear reactors

(2022/01/24)


UK aerospace and engineering giant Rolls-Royce is on the hunt for sites for its much-touted small nuclear reactors, which received a £210m grant from the UK government last year.

A consortium of BNF Resources UK Ltd, Exelon Generation Ltd, and Roll-Royce Group is [1]set to invest £195m roughly over three years, qualifying it for a £210m grant from government , specifically UK Research and Innovation Funding.

The group has now written to sites across the country to find a prospective home for a factory to build the new reactors. Writing to Local Enterprise Partnerships – non-profit bodies which aim to bring councils and commerce together – the group is seeking bids for the location of its "factory" set to make the new approach to nuclear-powered electricity generation, [2]according to the Financial Times .

[3]

Small modular reactors (SMRs) are much smaller than the current generation of nuclear reactors under construction. While [4]Hinkley Point C , currently being built by EDF in the west of England, is expected to produce 3,200MW of electricity – around 7 per cent of the UK's consumption – SMRs are expected to produce 300MWe per unit. Rolls-Royce said one of its SMR power stations will have the capacity to generate 470MW of "low carbon energy."

[5]

[6]

But what SMRs lack in economies of scale, they make up for in modular design and off-site construction. The [7]International Atomic Energy Authority says that "prefabricated units of SMRs can be manufactured and then shipped and installed on-site, making them more affordable to build than large power reactors, which are often custom-designed for a particular location, sometimes leading to construction delays. SMRs offer savings in cost and construction time, and they can be deployed incrementally to match increasing energy demand."

According to the FT, the consortium has written to LEPs promising the lucky winners would get "high value, sustainable jobs which will produce products that will be exported globally for many decades to come" if they were chosen for the factory site.

[8]

It was looking for "sites based on our selection criteria in your region together with supporting evidence or financial and non-financial support where appropriate," according to the pink business newspaper.

[9]Rolls-Royce set for funding fillip to build nuclear power stations based on small modular reactor technology

[10]Britain's on the brink of a small-scale nuclear reactor revolution

[11]New 'supercritical' generators to boost nuclear output by 50%

[12]Nuclear reaction: what's next in energy science?

A Rolls-Royce SMR spokesperson said: "The development and growth of a UK nuclear manufacturing base is core to the deployment of Rolls-Royce SMRs. We have therefore initiated a process to identify a site for the first major factory installation, the Heavy Pressure Vessel factory.

"We look forward to working with LEPs and the Welsh government to identify potential sites, an important step in delivering on our commitment to 80 per cent UK content for Rolls-Royce SMR deployment in the UK."

The government is putting a bill through Parliament proposing a "regulated asset base" funding model for new nuclear power stations in the UK. Currently in its second reading in the House of Lords, [13]the bill proposes [PDF] giving nuclear generation companies a right to a regulated revenue stream during the construction, commissioning, and operation of project.

The government's strategy includes a new £120m "Future Nuclear Enabling Fund" intended to "provide targeted support in relation to barriers to entry" for advanced nuclear technologies, including SMRs.

[14]

In November 2021, the government announced £210m in "new government funding" for developing the design of the Rolls-Royce SMR. At the time, government said the investment was to be matched by "private sector funding of over £250m." ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/09/rollsroyce_smr_funding/

[2] https://www.ft.com/content/d51eb5b5-d610-4874-8a7c-c4c9bc94d235

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2Ye7bUCRow19INVslVsYz4QAAANY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2019/09/25/hinkley_point_delayed_and_overbudget/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Ye7bUCRow19INVslVsYz4QAAANY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Ye7bUCRow19INVslVsYz4QAAANY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-are-small-modular-reactors-smrs

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44Ye7bUCRow19INVslVsYz4QAAANY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/09/rollsroyce_smr_funding/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2017/05/24/mini_nuclear_reactors_for_british_power/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2011/03/07/supercritical_co2_thermally_efficient_gennies/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2010/11/04/nuclear_renaissance_interview/

[13] https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9356/CBP-9356.pdf

[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33Ye7bUCRow19INVslVsYz4QAAANY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Phil O'Sophical

How much space do they need? I guess a standard back garden isn't enough?

Yet Another Anonymous coward

It is if you have a sufficient containment shed

MJI

Would be if you own a farm, or a large estate.

I think it was in region of sports field size.

Is that all

Anonymous Coward

£120m public + £250m private money when we are getting that much back every week as a Brexit benefit

Re: Is that all

Anonymous Coward

Can't work out if you intentionally left off the :

#pisstake

#sarcasm

#iamfuckingjoking

texts.

SMRs are expected to produce 300MWe per unit.

Arthur the cat

Which means maybe 600 MW waste thermal energy. That's one hell of a district heating system. Now all we have to do is get people to accept SMRs as the heart of new town developments.

[Only 50% glossobuccalic.]

Re: SMRs are expected to produce 300MWe per unit.

Neil Barnes

What do you want to bet that the very communities that grab the cash coming from the factories refuse point blank to have any of these new power stations in their back yards?

Money for old rope

DJO

All they need do is take an existing design for a submarine reactor and stick it in a shipping container.

Can't see that needs £210m for research, most of it has already been done and paid for.

Re: Money for old rope

Billy Whiz

That's pretty much what an SMR is. A submarine without the 'bangy' or 'floaty' bits (or 'sinky' for that matter)

Re: Money for old rope

Steve Foster

"shipping container". I believe you've mistyped "submarine"...

Perhaps we should be looking at providing grid connection points at Faslane, so that the existing fleet of nuclear subs could be used to provide electricity to the grid.

Re: Money for old rope

msobkow

"Sorry, we can't join in the fight against Russia over the Ukraine, because our subs are all being used to power toasters and dishwashers..."

Re: Money for old rope

Alex Stuart

Quite.

I ask the same question of why building new 'normal' size nukes is seemingly such a difficult, time-consuming and hugely expensive task, despite the world having decades of experience building them already - see EDF and Hinkley, etc.

It seems like as time goes by, we* get progressively worse** at building things. Houses, railways, reactors and so on.

* - The UK, or at least England

** - worse meaning they are either of worse quality, or take far more money and time to achieve than before. For example, we spend a lot more money per km of railway than other countries with comparable geographical constraints. And, er, HS2...

msobkow

Tough to get approval for anything "nuclear" in this day and age. The protestors show up before they even know what you're trying to do; they just heard a rumor of "nukes involved." :(

Korev

That's why lab chemists do NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) spectroscopy on their molecules but when the same technology is scaled to human size they call it MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) to avoid scaring people...

Just remember: when you go to court, you are trusting your fate to
twelve people that weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty!