News: 1640253371

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Wifinity hands customers bills for Wi-Fi services they didn't want but used by accident after software 'glitch' let 'fixed term' subs continue

(2021/12/23)


Members of the British Armed Forces Soldiers have reacted with anger after a British Wi-Fi provider failed to automatically end their time-limited contracts before charging them for consuming data "without subscription".

Ofcom-regulated Wifinity prompted a wave of fury when it told former subscribers on Ministry of Defence bases that they would be receive bills running into the hundreds of pounds for data services that former customers didn't want and hadn't signed up for.

Those bills were then "revised" without explanation down to sums of £10-£30, as seen by The Register , in what one ex-customer told us was a cynical attempt to trick recipients into paying up to avoid further hassles.

[1]

A spokesperson for Wifinity told The Register : "Due to technical reasons, some Wifinity customers remained and utilised our network despite their subscription having come to an end. We are sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused, and a full investigation is now under way."

[2]

[3]

The spokeswoman continued in her statement: "We would like to reassure customers that, in line with Ofcom guidance, we have limited back payments to only those who continued to use the network over the last three months, despite their subscription ending."

One soldier, William, told us he had been on overnight duty at an RAF station and bought a 24 hour subscription to Wifinity: "When I left at 6am I never used it again. I got an email stating that it was intended to end on 24th September however it didn't … they're trying to say I used over 55 hours of internet and 9GB of data was used uncharged."

Wifinity bills sent to British soldiers, shown to The Register

Another soldier, Scott, said he thought his devices had connected to his base's business Wi-Fi network only to be unpleasantly surprised when he received a demand for payment. Scott told us he "Only paid for [Wifinity] service at another camp where there was no other option".

Although Wifinity emailed customers citing "Ofcom regulations" that allowed the company to bill them for services they didn't want and hadn't intended to use, it failed to identify the regulation on which it relied.

[4]

When El Reg asked, the company cited an unofficial version of the regulator's [5]Ofcom Metering and Billing Direction [PDF], and its section 4.8.4 regarding delayed bills.

The company appeared to admit fault for the extra bills in a Twitter post:

Hi [6]@fillyourboots [7]@moddio . We recently contacted a minority of our subscribers regarding a software glitch that resulted in a billing issue. If you have received this message and you think it is a mistake, please contact us at support@wifinity.co.uk or DM us your details. — Wifinity (@wifinityuk) [8]December 17, 2021

When El Reg asked why what was first thought to be a billing system cockup was resulting in ex-customers being told to pay up, Wifinity told El Reg : "It is never our intention to financially disadvantage any of our customers and we provide dedicated 24/7 Customer Service support to anyone experiencing financial difficulties. Only customers who have used the service have been charged, and Wifinity has offered this at a substantially reduced rate."

Ofcom wasn't impressed, telling The Register that the regulation cited by Wifinity covers adding chargeable events to scheduled later bills if they were missed off by accident, not generating new ones.

In a statement a spokesman for the connectivity services regulator said: "Under Ofcom rules, the cost of an internet service should be clearly set out when a customer signs up to it, including the length of the contract term and the process for renewing or cancelling the contract at the end of that term.

[9]

“Customers who believe they have been incorrectly charged should initially raise a complaint with the company directly, and if that doesn’t resolve the issue, take their case to [10]the ombudsman to settle the dispute”.

Wifinity's [11](undated) terms and conditions on its website explain that its "fixed term" packages are in fact a monthly recurring subscription:

Where Customer has chosen a fixed term subscription for a predefined period number of months, Wifinity will take payment from the Customer each month on the same date or every 4 weeks from when the subscription was started until the end of the fixed term. At the end of the minimum term, the contract will automatically switch to a 4 weekly recurring package on the same product...

The four weekly recurring package - not a month - means customers have 13 billing periods during one calendar year.

Alfie Usher, MD of insurance biz [12]Forces Compare and who highlighted Wifinity's demands on his military themed [13]Facebook page "Fill Your Boots" , let El Reg know he was unable to comment because he'd lost his internet connection.

[14]Euro-telcos call on big tech to help pay for their network builds

[15]Telcos face £100k-a-day fines unless they obey new UK.gov rules on how to deploy Huawei 5G gear in their networks

[16]It's 2021 and a printf format string in a wireless network's name can break iPhone Wi-Fi

Wifinity's website says it provides paid-for Wi-Fi services at around 100 Ministry of Defence locations around the country. It also says the firm provides business connectivity to the MoD as a Fujitsu subcontractor, and has – somehow – signed the [17]Armed Forces Covenant , "a promise by the nation ensuring that those who serve or who have served in the armed forces, and their families, are treated fairly".

Nothing says "fair" like a "fixed term" subscription that has no fixed end point and which bills you 13 times a year. Merry Christmas! ®

Get our [18]Tech Resources



[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YcRW2T1B96Lsiit7MsQgCQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YcRW2T1B96Lsiit7MsQgCQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YcRW2T1B96Lsiit7MsQgCQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YcRW2T1B96Lsiit7MsQgCQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/209505/annex-7-metering-billing-direction.pdf#page=15

[6] https://twitter.com/FillYourBoots?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[7] https://twitter.com/Moddio?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[8] https://twitter.com/wifinityuk/status/1471877709848621056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YcRW2T1B96Lsiit7MsQgCQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[10] https://www.ombudsman-services.org/

[11] https://wifinity.co.uk/wifinity-terms/

[12] https://forcescompare.uk/

[13] https://www.facebook.com/Fillyourbootsmilitarybanter/posts/137620385305415

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/30/european_telecommunications_network_operators_association_letter/

[15] https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/24/telecommunications_security_bill/

[16] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/21/wifi_ssid_flaw/

[17] https://www.armedforcescovenant.gov.uk/

[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Richard 12

Pissing off the people who have all the really big guns seems ... unwise.

OFCOM should be treating this as evidence wifinity aren't "fit and proper persons", and suspend their licence to operate.

It would seem that the contract is unenforceable. Also, their billing system is known to be broken, so all bills are suspect.

Fujitsu have prior history on that, the word Horizon springs to mind.

When a fixed term contract ends ...

alain williams

then there is no agreement for providing a service or for charging the, now ex, customer.

The WIFI should have stopped working and the squaddie bought another fixed term contract if s/he wanted it.

Doctor Syntax

I'm sure the military advice would be to retreat in good order. Maybe the mess their billing is in won't let them do that because they can't distinguish who should have been billed & who shouldn't.

Why are soldiers being monetised for profit like this?

Howard Sway

Surely free wifi should be available at all military bases for those who have chosen to serve their country. Most other workplaces don't charge people who work there for using the wifi connectivity. But no, it seems that even here some bunch of rent extractors have to be allowed to skim off profits, even to the point of shamelessly trying to use questionable quibbling over interpretations of regulations and contracts.

Two hundred years ago today, Irma Chine of White Plains, New York, was
performing her normal housekeeping routines. She was interrupted by
British soldiers who, rallying to the call of their supervisor, General
Hughes, sought to gain control of the voter registration lists kept in
her home. Masking her fear and thinking fast, Mrs. Chine quickly divided
a nearby apple in two and deftly stored the list in its center. Upon
entering, the British blatantly violated every conceivable convention,
and, though they went through the house virtually bit by bit, their
search was fruitless. They had to return empty handed. Word of the
incident propagated rapidly through the region. This historic event
became the first documented use of core storage for the saving of registers.