A proposal to beat below-the-belt selfies: Crowdsourced machine learning using victims' image stashes
- Reference: 1640160305
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/12/22/clean_up_txt/
- Source link:
The last holder of that office recently resigned in disgrace after it emerged a flurry of texts he exchanged with a staffer crossed the line from racy to harassment as one message included an unsolicited dick pic.
After his resignation, a friend who is both a cricket fan and an AI expert messaged me.
[1]
"This can’t go on," she said.
[2]
[3]
"Well, he’s gone," I replied. "And there’s an end to it."
"I don’t mean that. Of course he’s gone,” she responded. “This happens all the time. Every day women are getting photos they never asked for, of bits that they’d rather not see."
[4]
"True dat. But what can you do about it? ‘Penis erectus conscientum non habet.’"
She rolled her eyes at my Latin. "It’s not as though I’d expect men to do anything about it. Apparently you all think your bits are suitable for framing."
"Well, if you can’t stop men being stupid – and god knows many have tried – what else is there?"
[5]
"Oh, I reckon this is a perfect problem for machine learning."
"What? How?"
"All these photos of all of these bits, they’re flying through systems that route them from >ahem< sender to an unfortunate receiver. I reckon it would be dead simple to build a filter on the receiver."
"A filter?"
"Something that could match those photos against an abstract, prototypical, possibly even Platonic bit, and intervene."
"So if it looks enough like someone’s bits…"
"…you’d stop it right there. And replace it."
"You’d replace a photo of someone’s bits with someone else’s?"
For that I got a look that telegraphed how can you be this dim? "No. You’d transmit another photo altogether. Of a duck."
"Which duck? Whose duck? Why a duck?"
"Everyone loves a good photo of a nice, friendly duck. So much less… surprising. And yet…"
"And yet, if someone received – apropos of nothing in particular – a photo of a duck…"
"…They’d know they’d been spared the sight of some bloke’s bits."
"Oh…"
"You see it now."
"It’s genius."
She giggled and said, "I know."
"There’s only one problem," I replied. "Bits come in all shapes and contours and colours. That’d mean quite a large… erm…training set."
"And that’s the second half of my plan. To train the model to detect the bits, we ask for contributions."
"From blokes?" I shuddered.
"No," she said, in a tone you’d use when addressing a poorly trained dog. "From all the women who have over the last twenty years been subjected to all those photos of all those blokes’ bits."
"Oh."
"Yes. Every time another unsolicited photo arrives, women can… deposit?… those bits in the appropriate receptacle. Improving the model."
"And, at the rate unsolicited bits are flying around these days…"
"Yeah," she sighed. "I reckon it should only take about a week."
[6]Through the Looking Glass – holographic display hardware is great, but it's not enough
[7]The web was done right the first time. An ancient 3D banana shows Microsoft does a lot right, too
[8]Blessed are the cryptographers, labelling them criminal enablers is just foolish
"You know, I now see seventh graders using web-based tools to train TensorFlow-based models. With pretty remarkable results. What you’ve described is basically a secondary-school project. The sort of thing that might win a science fair."
"It’s dead easy. We’ve got all this great tech, and it’s time to make it really useful, by adding some c**k-blocking to our messaging apps. Of course, you’d need to get Apple and Google and Facebook onboard..."
"But they need this. Everyone is tired of online harassment and [9]looking for a way to be seen to be doing the right thing. This is just that sort of feature. It’s a natural. By the end of next year, I reckon it’ll be a tickbox feature on most of your sharing services. Just click on ‘Ducks for d**ks’, and you’re protected."
"That’s my hope. It truly feels like it’s an idea whose time has come. And then, every time some bloke over-enthusiastically shares their bits, well, they’ll be gone for a duck." ®
PS: Yes, we know this has been done before – see [10]here , [11]here , and [12]here , for example – we're saying it should be more widespread and work well.
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YcMFXmxGAJ5mbenf115oCQAAARY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YcMFXmxGAJ5mbenf115oCQAAARY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YcMFXmxGAJ5mbenf115oCQAAARY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YcMFXmxGAJ5mbenf115oCQAAARY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/bootnotes&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YcMFXmxGAJ5mbenf115oCQAAARY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/29/through_the_looking_glass_the/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/08/11/column_cyberbanana_windows/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/12/blessed_are_the_cryptographers/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2018/01/15/facebook_landmark_privacy_case/
[10] https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/24/bumbles-private-detector-uses-ai-to-detect-dick-pics/
[11] https://thenextweb.com/news/dating-app-badoo-is-now-using-ai-to-detect-unsolicited-dick-pics
[12] https://futurism.com/the-byte/research-dick-pics-train-penis-ai
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Timescales
I assume the week was intended to gather the training data.
As to intercepting all message flows the article contains this: "I reckon it would be dead simple to build a filter on the receiver." The interception takes place on the receiving device which means the user downloads the filter(s) as required. This has the advantage that, given the tendency to remote medical consultations, there may be a legitimate use case for such traffic.
I have never really understood bloke's need for sending selphallic (selphies) messages to women they fancy.
I prefer to save such viewing for those private moments so that I can share with the lady in question either gasps of admiration or laughter, depending on the impression given.
What makes so many blokes think they are going to make a favourable impression based on an anatomical photo?
Note: selphies was coined by a female friend of mine who had been on the receiving end of a series of dick pics from an admirer, she signed him up for every penis enlargement ad she could find. He desisted.
I guess they see it as the equivalent of going up to someone in a club and saying fancy a shag and not the ornithological type. Depending on the response they would have an idea of whether they would be successful. There are many idiots out there that don't consider other peoples feelings.
Can I propose the substitute picture be of a squirrel?
An example of squirrel-replacement can be found at https://what-if.xkcd.com/98/.
Replace with cat pic?
If the pics were replaced with cute cat pics then ......
the system would be turning 'dick-pics' into 'pussy-pics'.....
Sorry, it just had to be done!
...............…………………………._¸„„„„_
…………………….…………...„--~*'¯…….'\
………….…………………… („-~~--„¸_….,/ì'Ì
…….…………………….¸„-^"¯ : : : : :¸-¯"¯/'
……………………¸„„-^"¯ : : : : : : : '\¸„„,-"
**¯¯¯'^^~-„„„----~^*'"¯ : : : : : : : : : :¸-"
.:.:.:.:.„-^" : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :„-"
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: : : : : : : : : : ¸„-^¯
.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. : : : : : : : ¸„„-^¯
:.' : : '\ : : : : : : : ;¸„„-~"
:.:.:: :"-„""***/*'ì¸'¯
:.': : : : :"-„ : : :"\
.:.:.: : : : :" : : : : \,
:.: : : : : : : : : : : : 'Ì
: : : : : : :, : : : : : :/
"-„_::::_„-*__„„~"
Re: Sorry, it just had to be done!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ________
. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. . . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . . . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. . . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . . .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ..`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..`\
Requires some letters to post!
Re: Sorry, it just had to be done!
I can go one better
[1]Risky Click of the Day. Do you risk it?
[1] https://bit.ly/3yQRMAh
Timescales
"Yeah," she sighed. "I reckon it should only take about a week."
Somewhat ambitious considering it needs to intercept ALL email and message flows if it's going have any effect.