News: 1637235965

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

New study demonstrates iodine as satellite propellant... in space

(2021/11/18)


Scientists are trying to support the boom in miniaturised satellites with the development of a plasma engine using an iodine propellant — rather than the commonly used xenon — for the first time.

Launched last November by Chinese space biz Spacety, the propulsion systems developed by French company TrustMe are meant to offer a cheaper and more scalable alternative to xenon propulsion, according to a peer-reviewed study by Ukrainian co-founder and CTO Dmytro Rafalskyi.

[1]

NASA's Dawn spacecraft also travels through space using ion propulsion, in which ions are accelerated out of an engine, giving the spacecraft thrust. In this illustration, a xenon propellant is used (the xenon ions glow with blue light - iodine ions are likely to glow violet). Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Roughly speaking, plasma engines use an electric field to accelerate particles of a charged gas which pushes the vehicle along. The fuel is whatever the source of electricity is – solar in the case of satellites – but they still require a propellant gas. Xenon has become the de facto propellant for plasma space engines that help shunt around satellites in orbit, although more recently [2]Elon Musk's SpaceX has adopted krypton .

Schematic of the NPT30-I2 iodine electric propulsion system

[3]

Solid iodine (darker green region) is located in a storage tank upstream of the plasma source tube (blue region). Heating causes sublimation and a low-pressure gas (lighter green region) enters the source tube (green arrow). A plasma (purple region) is created by a RF antenna, and iodine ions (I + , I 2 + and I 2 + ) are accelerated by a set of grids. A cathode emits electrons (e − ) to neutralise the ion beam. Waste heat is conducted towards the iodine tank and structural frame (solid blue arrows) or radiated away (blue dashed arrows). Image: Rafalskyi et al

The problem is Xenon is expensive and needs to be compressed in high-pressure tanks to fit onboard a satellite, according to an article accompanying the paper, "In-orbit demonstration of an iodine electric propulsion system", published in Nature this week. "Krypton is cheaper, but still requires a complex and heavy gas-storage and -supply system," it said.

Small satellites are less than around 100kg in mass and are increasing in popularity. The number launched into space has risen steadily from 39 in 2011 to 389 in 2019, before jumping to 1,202 in 2020.

Speaking to The Register , Rafalskyi explained that Xenon was a no-go for satellites at this scale.

[4]

"Xenon is the heaviest noble gas which is not radioactive. That's how xenon came into the game and at the moment when it started to be used, mission costs were actually quite huge. So, the costs of Xenon was fine, but now we can’t miniaturise the technology and the cost is insane," he said.

[5]

[6]

It is not just the cost of the raw material. Xenon needs to be handled in higher pressure tanks capable of withstanding 100s of kg per square centimetre. It's forbidden to pre-fill satellites with Xenon before taking them to the launch site – it would be like transporting a bomb, Rafalskyi said – so specialist equipment and certified engineeres are needed to fill the spacecraft, again driving up costs.

Space engineers needed an alternative if they were going to be able to manoeuvre their miniaturised spacecraft after they had been ejected from their launch vehicles.

[7]

Iodine had been proposed as a contender since the 1970s. It is solid at room temperature but easily sublimates to a gas making it much easier to transport and store than xenon.

But little was known about its fundamental properties as a plasma gas, Rafalskyi said.

Outside of medicine, iodine was not used for many other applications requiring an understanding of anything beyond its basic properties. So Rafalskyi – who has a PhD in plasma physics – and his team got to work establishing a database of properties based on their experiments.

[8]

Iodine is a halogen and so chemically active. Its corrosive properties needed to be understood in detail before introducing to serious engineering. "It is corrosive with stainless steel, for example, but you can't find those corrosion rates with good precision. We had to create our own database of materials and their corrosion rates with Iodine, which required a lot of testing and a lot of measurements," he said.

The team was also first to measure emission yields of electrons from the gas. "It sounds a bit complex, but it's one of the properties you kind of need to know if you’re going to develop an engine," Rafalskyi said.

The team also had to tackle engineering challenges, such as how to manage the corrosive properties of iodine in an engine that might operate for 2,000 hours. Meanwhile, it also makes engines prone to "clogging" as it condenses as easily as it sublimates.

Together, collecting physical data and the engineering challenges took around seven years during which the mission was his "personal goal", Rafalskyi said.

In the TrustMe engine, solid iodine is stored in a tank, where it sublimates to a gas. From there, it is fed into a plasma chamber where it is split into ions and free electrons. The ions are accelerated out the back of the engine by a magnetic field produced by an antenna on the outside of the chamber. But they need to be neutralised as they exit, otherwise, they get sucked back into the engine again after a few microseconds.

In established plasma engines, this is done using the same propellant as the thruster. But none of these devices was compatible with iodine, Rafalskyi said.

"That was a really big challenge. It seemed almost impossible at the time. We had to change the concept completely and go back in time to use an older technology of a filament neutraliser. It would work, for sure, with iodine but it was extremely tricky to position and tune," he said.

[9]Russia blows up old satellite, NASA boss 'outraged' as ISS crew shelters from debris

[10]Satellite of love: Space broadband outfit Viasat acquires rival Inmarsat

[11]Amazon hasn't launched one internet satellite yet, but it's now planning a fleet of 7,774

[12]50 years have gone by since the UK's one – and only – homegrown foray into orbit

In commentary on the [13]peer-reviewed paper , Igor Levchenko of the Plasma Sources and Application Centre at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University, and Kateryna Bazaka at the College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian National University, said the project had successfully demonstrated an iodine-ion thruster working in space, "offering a cheaper and simpler alternative to xenon or krypton."

According to the paper:

The propulsion system has undergone extensive qualification to meet in-space conditions and launch-vehicle requirements, and a flight model was recently integrated into the Beihangkongshi-1 satellite operated by Spacety. The 12-unit CubeSat (with a mass of approximately 20kg) was launched into space onboard a Long March 6 rocket on 6 November 2020. The satellite was injected into a circular, Sun-synchronous orbit with an altitude of approximately 480km.

But customers did not wait for the publication of the results of the test of the NPT30-I2 Beihangkongshi-1 satellite launched by a Long March 6 rocket last year.

"We already have one commercial flight and in addition, we have delivered more than 10 systems to clients worldwide this year," Rafalskyi said.

The TrustMe team is currently working to upgrade to a commercial production line which they hope will produce 100 systems per year by the middle of next year to meet the booming demand for small satellites for which even a modicum of manoeuvrability is a bonus. ®

Get our [14]Tech Resources



[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/11/02/dawn_spacecraft.jpg

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2019/05/17/spacex_starlink_microsoft_update/

[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/11/18/iodine_diagram.jpg

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YZaGxO2EG3DmMsEDohcbngAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YZaGxO2EG3DmMsEDohcbngAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YZaGxO2EG3DmMsEDohcbngAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YZaGxO2EG3DmMsEDohcbngAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YZaGxO2EG3DmMsEDohcbngAAABM&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/16/russia_satellite_iss/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/10/viasat_acquires_inmarsat/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/05/amazon_satellite_internet/

[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/28/black_arrow/

[13] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04015-y

[14] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



On the one hand : Science !

Pascal Monett

On the other hand : another excuse to put thousands more satellites into an already crowded orbital junkyard.

My heart is torn.

Re: On the one hand : Science !

MiguelC

Fine science, it seems, but calling the company " [1]TrustMe "? Really?

[1] https://youtu.be/SjwX-zMRxO0

Re: On the one hand : Science !

Paul Crawford

Why not ThrustMe?

Far more appropriate for an engine. Or doing the time-warp dance...

Re: On the one hand : Science !

Sleep deprived

Why not ThrustMe?

Because the French have a problem with pronouncing the th, which comes out as z (ze satellite...)

Re: On the one hand : Science !

Peter Gathercole

Maybe this technology can be used to provide the end-of-life de-orbit maneuver.

Maybe mix the iodine

Andy Non

with Ammonia first. That would give it a bit more "kick". ;-)

I'll get my lab coat, mine's the one with hole blown in the pocket and label saying "mad scientist".

Re: Maybe mix the iodine

Chris G

The ammonia helps it to make pretty purple smoke but is that good as reaction mass?

Re: Maybe mix the iodine

DoctorPaul

Oh that reminds me of some "unofficial" bits of chemistry at school back in the 60's :-)

I seem to recall that potassium permanganate and conc sulphuric acid provided interesting results - covered the entire chemistry lab in a layer of fine black fluff some ten minutes before the class was due to start.

Which in turn reminds me fondly of the grinding mill for gunpowder that my friend and I made out of Meccano, an Andrews tin and some marbles. Sealed (small) jar of the powder was ignited electronically using a model railway transformer, two wires and a sliver of tin foil - I sometimes wonder how I survived my childhood!

Uh

DarkwavePunk

Don't mess with halogens. Put some dioxygen difluoride into the mix to spice things up - that'll get you bang for your buck.

Re: Uh

O RLY

For a fun read about FOOF, here's Derek Lowe, PhD, discussing why he will never work with it.

https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-work-dioxygen-difluoride

[1]https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-work-dioxygen-difluoride

[1] https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/things-i-won-t-work-dioxygen-difluoride

little was known about its fundamental properties

Spoobistle

I do hope we're not going to discover that dusting iodine over the upper atmosphere might be a bad move. Still, it might help sterilize any "plagues from spaaace" a la Hoyle & Wickramasinghe!

Re: little was known about its fundamental properties

Mike 137

"I do hope we're not going to discover that dusting iodine over the upper atmosphere might be a bad move "

I suspect we will. Halogens are highly active chemically. However it may not become apparent for some time, making it harder to reverse.

Re: little was known about its fundamental properties

adam 40

What about when it condenses onto other spacecraft (if used in orbit)?

Re: little was known about its fundamental properties

Yet Another Anonymous coward

Space is big. Really big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mindbogglingly big it is.

The number of Iodine atoms/m^3 this adds ......

Nice

tony72

From a quick Google, it seems like iodine is about $80/kg, while Krypton is only $3 (and Xenon is $850). But I guess if the storage system is much simplified (i.e. lighter) with iodine, that's probably much more significant than the cost of the stuff itself. I guess we'll know soon enough; if there's a significant cost saving, certain companies putting thousands of satellites into orbit are surely going to take note.

Re: Nice

Gene Cash

Rockets are 100% engineering tradeoffs. For example, liquid hydrogen has more bang than RP-1 (a refined kerosene) but the tanks are huge and need cryo insulation... so first stages use RP-1 because the rocket overall ends up a lot lighter and smaller, and that's important in a first stage.

It's not a cost saving. It's a space & weight saving. Cubesats have a hard size and mass budget. If you exceed it, you're not a cubesat any more, and you don't fit into the standard launcher or the ride-share.

Re: Nice

Yet Another Anonymous coward

Wouldn't you just pick the heaviest material that is a liquid at room temperature and easily vaporized?

Something silvery and quick ?

Supporting a boom in the small satellite market

lglethal

I'm not sure if the customers will be that happy if they're satellites go boom due to this thruster.

Things going Boom on a satellite are generally considered very bad indeed. We're all looking at you Russia! *shakes head in disgust *

Re: Supporting a boom in the small satellite market

Mark 85

We're all looking at you Russia! *shakes head in disgust *

Better add the US and China to that disgust. They've blown satellites up intentionally also.

Needs more thrust

adam 40

I'm surprised about the single voltage gradient in the thruster.

Surely a more efficient method would be a linear accelerator, or even a cyclotron, so accelerate the ions to near light velocities?

Then you can cut down on your propellant for a given impulse.

Re: Needs more thrust

Yet Another Anonymous coward

Easier to add extra propellant mass than engineering to increase the velocity - unless you have a very long voyage planned where the amount of the stuff you chuck overboard matters.

Efficiency is just electrical power in vs kinetic energy out - more complex systems to create higher velocities would generally be less efficient.

Don't drink when you drive -- you might hit a bump and spill it.