UK government publishes guidance on security rules for tech takeovers
- Reference: 1637149565
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/11/17/uk_government_publishes_guidance_national/
- Source link:
The legislation, due to come into force in January, gives the government leeway to scrutinise buyouts and investments, impose certain conditions on an acquisition or, if necessary, unwind or block it. The statement issued this week, did, however say it expects to do this rarely, while the "vast majority" of deals will be able to proceed without delay.
The issue of technologies considered important to national security has become relevant to the tech sector in recent months, as stories about [1]chip plant ownership and advanced materials hit the news. In the new guidance, the government said it wanted businesses and investors to get ready for the changes in the law. It wants them to assess whether the government must be notified of an acquisition and understand what they are to expect when they go through the notification and assessment process.
[2]
Business minister Lord Callanan said the government would not hesitate to intervene where necessary to protect our national security.
[3]
[4]
"The new investment screening process will be simpler and quicker, giving investors and firms the certainty they need to do business, and I urge them to make sure they are ready for the changes before they come into force in January," he said.
The guidance says that "if an entity you are acquiring performs a certain activity, it could put you in scope of the National Security and Investment Act and you may be legally required to tell the government about it (known as a 'mandatory notification'). This guidance tells you what these activities are."
[5]
The guidance covers a long list of technologies, not all of them relevant to IT, but included in the box below.
Technology areas covered by the National Security and Investment Act 2021, which comes into force in January 2022
Advanced Materials
Advanced Robotics
Artificial Intelligence
Civil Nuclear
Communications
Computing Hardware
Critical Suppliers to Government
Cryptographic Authentication
Data Infrastructure
Defence
Energy
Military and Dual-Use
Quantum Technologies
Satellite and Space Technologies
Suppliers to the Emergency Services
Synthetic Biology
Transport
The list includes Artificial Intelligence. Regarding AI, it says investors should consider if their target does research into, develops or produces goods, software or technology that uses AI and whether that technology is used to identify or track advanced robotics or "cyber security."
To determine if a qualifying entity you are seeking to acquire is in-scope of the "Computing Hardware" part of the regulations calls for an assessment of whether the target company owns, creates, supplies or exploits the intellectual property of hardware products or functions.
The rules stretch to data infrastructure, which includes data centre operators, cloud storage service providers, managed service providers, specialist or technical service providers, software providers with access to customer data. They do not cover off-the-shelf software though.
Within scope for cryptographic authentication are technologies that identify a physical person using an access token, or use a biometric property of an individual to access a restricted area.
[6]
The guidance also includes chip-and-pin technology and e-passports in this category.
The government is putting forward two pieces of secondary legislation. The Procedure for Service Statutory Instrument sets out how the government sends and receives documents under the Act while the Form and Content of Notification Forms Statutory Instrument sets out what information is required in the Act's notification forms, which parties can submit to the government under the Act.
In a [7]statement on National Security and Investment Act 2021 the government made it clear it would not set out the circumstances in which national security is, or may be, considered at risk, reflecting a policy to ensure that national security powers are sufficiently flexible to protect the nation.
In September, [8]the UK government issued a surprise public interest intervention notice against the proposed takeover of Welsh advanced materials specialist Perpetuus Group, claiming it represents a potential threat to national security.
Founded in 2013, the Perpetuus Group's main subsidiary is Perpetuus Advanced Materials, a company that recently boasted of a breakthrough in the production of plasma-processed P-doped graphene and the creation of a "drop reactor" prototype which could produce surface-modified graphene in one-thirtieth the time of its previous approach.
In July, Prime Minister Boris Johnson [9]promised a national security investigation into a China-backed corporation's takeover of Britain's largest producer of semiconductors, Newport Wafer Fab (NWF) in a deal reported to be worth £63m ($87m).
Yesterday, the Competition and Markets Authority said it was moving its probe of the Nvidia/ Arm merger into [10]Phase 2 , and will undertake deeper scrutiny. Digital Secretary Nadine Dorries stated explicitly this is due to "national security" issues. ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/23/ukri_denies_newport_wafer_fab_fund_issue/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YZU1QKPwk4N-EyKmMDidfQAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YZU1QKPwk4N-EyKmMDidfQAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YZU1QKPwk4N-EyKmMDidfQAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YZU1QKPwk4N-EyKmMDidfQAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YZU1QKPwk4N-EyKmMDidfQAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-and-investment-statement-about-exercise-of-the-call-in-power
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/07/uk_gov_blocks_perpetuus_acquisition_of_taurus/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/07/uk_newport_wafer_fab_probe/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/16/nvidia/
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: 18. Political Party Donations From Foreign Interests.
You can still buy power and water suppliers and newspapers
So, basically..
ANY deal involving anything more technical than a pair of scissorts now required investors to "sponsor"* bits of Westminster to make it happen. This is IMHO simply setting up a massive new bribing industry.
* Bribes camouflaged as very excessive lunches, business trips and promises of cushy positions in an approach familiar to, for instance, Irish privacy commissioners.
Re: So, basically..
Yes but it would stop foreigners taking over LandRover (clause 7,11,12,15,17)
We are a technology colony of the US; this is just icing on their cake
A The Register already knows, it is my firm belief that the signing of the Defence Trade Co-operation Treaty, which allows the US to simply list any technology that they believe is being worked on by ANY UK, (and Australian), facility; must be handed to the US without even any paper trail; which treaty now makes us a technology colony of the US . . . That we are no longer an independent nation free to develop our own unique defence technology industrial base. Now take a close look at the above list of technologies . . . and realise that is exactly what the treaty describes. So this is simply an extension of the colonisation of our nation; and you can bet your bottom $ that the US is the leader of this new guidance; not parliament. We have been colonised; this is simply an extension of that process; designed to take full control of the national inventive capacity.
Re: We are a technology colony of the US; this is just icing on their cake
"now makes us a technology colony of the US"
What do you mean by 'now'?
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for: RADAR, Digital electronic computing, Jet propulsion, Supersonic flight
Traditional American security methods
"Don't write anything you can phone. Don't phone anything you can talk. Don't talk anything you can whisper. Don't whisper anything you can smile. Don't smile anything you can nod. Don't nod anything you can wink." - Earl K. Long
18. Political Party Donations From Foreign Interests.
Bigger threat to our national security than anything else on that list.
I predict this is just going to backwater the British tech sector. Let's see ...