News: 1633429384

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Italian researchers' silver nano-spaghetti promises to help solve power-hungry neural net problems

(2021/10/05)


Researchers in Italy have developed a physical system to mimic properties of human brains that they hope will massively reduce the power costs of neural networks fundamental to AI development.

Successful approaches to neural networks have largely depended on software representations of brain synapses on top of a conventional stack of digital computing hardware and software.

However, [1]a paper published in Nature Materials this week shows that neural networks can be built using analogue computing based on a physical mesh of silver nanowires which, when viewed under an electron microscope, look rather appropriately like a plate of spaghetti.

[2]

Scanning electron microscopy image of a highly interconnected memristive nanowire network reservoir (scale bar, 2 μm) Image: Milano et al

Nodes between the wire are "memristive" in nature, which means their resistance depends on the voltage which has passed through them. The resistive switching mechanism at the nanowire junctions is modulated by the formation/rupture of a silver conductive path across the nanowire shell layer, under the action of the applied electric field.

Gianluca Milano, a post-doctoral researcher at Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica in Torino, told The Register the main goal was to massively reduce the number of training parameters needed to get neural networks to make sense of input data.

[3]

"For your natural networks, the most expensive part, in terms of power costs, is training: usually you have thousands of parameters that you have to train. And this is the root of the [4]AI power consumption problem ," he said.

[5]

[6]

The researcher's response was to divide computation into two parts. In the first, the input is processed by means of short-term memory, which is taken care of by the physical reservoir, which does not have to be trained. Only long-term memory requires training in terms of "a fine-tuning of parameters," Milano said.

"In this sense, you can reduce the number of parameters that you have to train by a lot, and also you can simplify the hardware required," he said.

[7]

Using the approach, a 4x4 training input grid would only required three training parameters, rather than 16, the paper shows.

[8]University, Nvidia team teaches robots to get a grip with OpenAI's CLIP

[9]Intel offers Loihi 2 to boffins: A 7nm chip with more than 1m programmable neurons

[10]If it's going to rain within the next 90 mins, this very British AI system can warn you

[11]US drug watchdog green-lights first prostate-cancer-predicting AI software

The system was trained to recognise handwritten numerals from 0 to 9, with another benchmark being the prediction of the Mackey–Glass time series, originally developed to model the variation in the relative quantity of mature cells in the blood – and considered difficult to predict with "conventional machine-learning algorithms".

The study is part of a trend looking into neuromorphic computing, which takes direct inspiration from brain structures and physics, rather than modelling these processes on a conventional computing stack.

[12]

From the paper: Fully memristive reservoir computing implementation and spatio-temporal evolution of the nanowire network reservoir state (click to enlarge) Image: Milano et al

The principle demonstrated in the paper promises a reduction in power consumption of neural networks by several orders of magnitude.

Fellow report author Carlo Ricciardi, associate professor at Politecnico di Torino, said that in simulated neural networks, the energy cost was around 1 milli-joule per synaptic event. The energy required for each biological brain synaptic event was to the order of 10 to the -13 Joules. The research suggests systems might be built requiring 10 times that amount.

It's not quite the efficiency — and a long way from the scale — of the human brain. But perhaps an interesting step in the right direction. ®

Get our [13]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-021-01099-9

[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/10/05/spag.png

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YVx2yDChwsfOkwq37ajJSAAAAJg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/13/ai_environmental_cost/

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YVx2yDChwsfOkwq37ajJSAAAAJg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YVx2yDChwsfOkwq37ajJSAAAAJg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/science&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YVx2yDChwsfOkwq37ajJSAAAAJg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/01/uw_nvidia_clip_model_paper/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/10/01/artificial_brain_intel/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/30/ai_model_rain_deepminnd/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/30/fda_prostate_cancer/

[12] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/10/05/fig3.png

[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Mmmmm, spaghetti ....

jmch

Erm, I mean, wow, that seems interesting! Probably difficult to physically scale down, and therefore will probably fir the amount of neurones of a mouse brain in a contraption the size of a room.... but nevertheless it would still be more energy efficient than a softwrae-based neaural net, and if it's even half as clever as a mouse it would be a million times cleverer than today's neural nets

Re: Mmmmm, spaghetti ....

TeeCee

..a mouse brain in a contraption the size of a room...

Oh great, house-sized robotic mice. Now you've gone and done it.

Re: Mmmmm, spaghetti ....

Blank Reg

I don't know about that, they are using nano wires so small that you need an electron microscope to see them. it sounds like it's already scaled down

Re: Mmmmm, spaghetti ....

Inkey

It's not that new

And should be scalable, if you consider that actual human nuerons have been trained... although you would still have to feed them.

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/10/041022104658.htm

Truly fascinating though ...

Little head cheese with your bolignese sir?

Bistromathics!

Alister

Bistromathics itself is simply a revolutionary new way of understanding the behavior of numbers, Just as Einstein observed that space was not an absolute but depended on the observer's movement in space and that time was not an absolute, but depended on the observer's movement in time, so it is now realized that numbers am not absolute, but depend on the observer's movement in restaurants.

10**9 energy consumption improvement?

Tom 7

That's pretty good. And combined with the neuromorphic improvement which I think will have several orders of magnitude reduction in the volume of neural nets, assuming this stuff runs at a commensurate speed, we could be getting somewhere soon!

There's the problem

Morrie Wyatt

Silver nanowires?

Should be platinum iridium shouldn't it?

Not a problem though, just get Powell and Donovan onto it, they'll sort it right out.

Or Susan Calvin if you would prefer.

Mine's the one with "I Robot" and "The rest of the robots" in the pocket.

Neuromorphic seems very popular all of a sudden.

Anonymous Coward

Wonder where they get their inspiration? 3. 2. 1. and Turn.

Cliffwilliams44

"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind."

The O. C. Bible

BinkyTheHorse

2022 would be a bit early, but putting e.g. 2030 for "Butlerian Jihad" sounds about right.

Off by a bit

BinkyTheHorse

"[...] usually you have thousands of parameters that you have to train."

No, "thousands" is for toy problems. Tens of millions is completely normal for real-world problems, with state-of-the-art nets being some orders of magnitude more complex still (GPT-3 has supposedly 175 billion ).

Perhaps the researcher was confusing the number of "parameters" with "possible combinations of hiper parameters", but that's problem-specific, so doesn't map to ANN scales directly. Either way, a bit worrying to potentially see the relevant researchers being under such a misconception – hopefully it was merely a mental hiccup.

Regardless, progress in this problem is welcome in any case. Icon related, especially in the Summer.

Hotels are tired of getting ripped off. I checked into a hotel and they
had towels from my house.
-- Mark Guido