BT jittery about Cellnex snapping up UK mobile tower assets
- Reference: 1632404592
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/09/23/bt_concerned_about_cellnex_deal/
- Source link:
BT – which owns mobile outfit EE – backs the Competition and Merger’s Authority (CMA) investigation into the deal, insisting that if it goes ahead, it could have a lasting impact on the UK’s mobile landscape.
In November 2020, CK Hutchison Holdings, the Hong Kong-based firm that owns UK network Three, [1]confirmed plans to sell its European tower business to Cellnex , the Spain-based operator of wireless telecoms infrastructure.
[2]
To date, all of Hutchison's cross-Euro deals with Cellnex [3]have been granted regulatory approval – except in the UK, where some 6,000 cell towers are up for grabs.
[4]
[5]
In July, the CMA confirmed plans to press ahead with a Phase 2 investigation into the deal amid concerns regarding the competitiveness of the UK's mobile industry and access to cell tower infrastructure, in a move that has been backed by BT.
"The Merger would represent a significant development in the UK wireless telecommunications sector, raising serious competition concerns that will adversely affect the supply of access to developed macro wireless telecommunications sites and ancillary services to BT and other UK wireless communication providers," said the UK telco.
[6]
In the four-page document [7][PDF] , BT argued that Cellnex "already holds a very strong position in the relevant UK markets", which includes the Spanish towerco’s [8]buyout of British mast outfit Arqiva for £2bn in October 2019, making it the largest independent operator of wireless infrastructure in the UK.
[9]Hellfire and damnation: Two French monks charged over 5G mast arson attack
[10]Vodafone on mega Euro masts biz: From our Vantage point, we want €2bn+ from towers IPO
[11]Tomorrow's wireless world will be fatter, faster, and creepier
[12]Not keen on a 5G mast in your street? At least it'd be harder for crackpots to burn down 'a flying cell tower in orbit'
Coupled with the addition of Three UK’s mobile phone infrastructure assets, BT claims the proposed merger would "strengthen Cellnex’s already significant market position, resulting in price rises" for operators.
BT went on to say that it considers the deal would "materially enlarge the already significant share of the Relevant Market held by Cellnex" and would "remove any realistic scope for Cellnex’s smaller competitors to achieve critical scale in the short-to medium-term".
This would, it said, "inevitably lead to higher prices for the services offered by Cellnex to BT and other UK wireless operators and lower service levels."
Last week, a joint legal document from Hutchison and Cellnex warned that any attempt to block Cellnex's takeover of Hutchison UK's tower network could see consumers "significantly worse off" and [13]hamper the progress of Three UK's planned £3bn investment in 5G .
[14]
What's more, they claimed that the UK competition watchdog's decision to probe the sale was flawed and based on a "simplistic and misleading" assessment rather than a proper understanding of how real-world markets operate.
Both Hutchison and Cellnex declined to comment. No one from BT was available for comment at the time of writing. ®
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/13/hutchinson_sells_masts/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YUykw0mHcnfI194AakkSkQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/28/cellnex_ck_hutchison_cma_inquiry/
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YUykw0mHcnfI194AakkSkQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YUykw0mHcnfI194AakkSkQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YUykw0mHcnfI194AakkSkQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/614aea40d3bf7f05b2ac20ec/BT_s_response_to_issues_statement.pdf
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2019/10/08/cellnex_telecom_snaps_up_arqiva_for_2bn/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/22/french_monks_5g_arson/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/09/vodafone_vantage_towers_ipo_range/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/20/wireless_world_of_tomorrow/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/12/oq_5g_iot/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/20/three_uk_cellnex_cma_filing/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YUykw0mHcnfI194AakkSkQAAABg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Foreign Businesses Say ...
And more control to the chinese government, their world domination via the backdoor.
A bit rich for BT....
It's a bit rich for BT to say "that it considers the deal would "materially enlarge the already significant share of the Relevant Market held by Cellnex" and would "remove any realistic scope for Cellnex’s smaller competitors to achieve critical scale in the short-to medium-term" considering that BT normally does everything it can to quash competition at every opportunity.
So - the company (BT) who has been hampering the upgrade of the UK internet infrastructure by sweating the copper assets that were handed to it many years ago is complaining that another provider owning these assets would become a monopoly provider? I call pot meets kettle.
I certainly can't think of a company better suited than BT for spotting opportunities for less competition and higher prices.
Fuscking Hypocrites
If the issue concerns them so much why dont they offer to buy back the masts they flogged off to Arquiva in the first place?
You dont get to sell an asset for a quick buck then act all outraged when someone else does the same or tries to consolidate the market. This was an obvious risk and they are due the consequences shoved where the sun dont shine. They dont like it up 'em.
(An aside how many times have they flogged off their mobile telco's only to buy another at 10x the price). Greedy inconsistent cnuts.
Foreign Businesses Say ...
"More fire-sale cheap UK infrastructure? Yes please! Om nom nom nom."