Clegg on its face: Facebook turns to former UK deputy PM to fend off damaging headlines
- Reference: 1632142797
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/09/20/facebook_defence/
- Source link:
The [1]WSJ alleged Facebook Inc knows, "in acute detail, that its platforms are riddled with flaws that cause harm, often in ways only the company fully understands."
Its investigation included articles claiming that researchers inside Facebook-owned Instagram had found the photo-sharing platform was harmful to a "sizable percentage" of young people, especially teenage girls, but "played down the app's negative effects."
[2]
Elsewhere, the paper quoted insiders as claiming a change to Facebook's algorithm in 2018 - designed to improve the platform by building on people's relationships with family and friends - had the opposite effect.
[3]
[4]
Another WSJ accusation in the series pointed to instances where staff had reported concerns about human trafficking and incitement to violence, and contained claims the company's response had been "in many instances…inadequate or nothing at all."
Plus, there are revelations of a programme – called “cross check” or “XCheck” – that shines a light on a “secret elite that’s exempt” from many of the platform’s rules that have to be obeyed by ordinary people.
[5]
In its introduction to its explosive series of files, the WSJ said: “The documents offer perhaps the clearest picture thus far of how broadly Facebook’s problems are known inside the company, up to the chief executive himself.”
Now, the social media giant has hit back, claiming that while it is “absolutely legitimate for us to be held to account,” the stories contained “deliberate mischaracterizations of what we are trying to do, and conferred egregiously false motives to Facebook’s leadership and employees.”
[6]
Facebook hype man Nick Clegg
Coming to its defence was former UK Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, who became the country's deputy prime minister in 2010 after his party accepted a coalition deal with the Conservatives. While in the coalition, Clegg backed both spending cuts and a rise in further education tuition fees (which he'd formerly been against while in an opposition government), setting off a big drop in left-wing Lib Dem members and voters. He resigned after the 2015 general election and became a lobbyist and PR man for Facebook just over three years later.
Writing in the [7]company’s blog over the weekend , Clegg, whose job title at Facebook is vice president of Global Affairs, wrote: “At the heart of this series is an allegation that is just plain false: that Facebook conducts research and then systematically and willfully ignores it if the findings are inconvenient for the company.
“This impugns the motives and hard work of thousands of researchers, policy experts and engineers at Facebook who strive to improve the quality of our products, and to understand their wider (positive and negative) impact.
[8]
“It’s a claim which could only be made by cherry-picking selective quotes from individual pieces of leaked material in a way that presents complex and nuanced issues as if there is only ever one right answer,” he wrote.
Clegg continued: “Facebook understands the significant responsibility that comes with operating a global platform.
[9]Ireland unfriends Facebook: Oh Zucky Boy, the pipes, the pipes are closing…from glen to US, and through the EU-side
[10]Now that Trump is useless to Zuckerberg, ex-president is exiled from Facebook for two years, possibly indefinitely
[11]Facebook names former Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg head of global affairs
[12]Facebook's CEO on his latest almighty Zuck-up: OK, we did try to smear critics, but I was too out-of-the-loop to know
“We take it seriously, and we don’t shy away from scrutiny and criticism,” he said.
US lawmakers 'in touch with Facebook whistleblower'
Last week, the US Senate's Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security reacted quickly to the reports, announcing it would take a further look at concerns regarding the social media platform.
In a strongly worded [13]statement , US senators Richard Blumenthal (D) and Marsha Blackburn (R), Chair and Ranking Member of the Committee, said: “It is clear that Facebook is incapable of holding itself accountable."
They added: “The Wall Street Journal’s reporting reveals Facebook’s leadership to be focused on a growth-at-all-costs mindset that valued profits over the health and lives of children and teens.
“We are in touch with a Facebook whistleblower and will use every resource at our disposal to investigate what Facebook knew and when they knew it – including seeking further documents and pursuing witness testimony. The Wall Street Journal’s blockbuster reporting may only be the tip of the iceberg.”
Their comments follow months of public scrutiny about the potential damage social media can have on the wellbeing of young people.
In the UK, there’s little doubt the events in the US will be watched with interest. [14]Nadine Dorries , the new minister in charge of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), [15]wrote recently about her concerns about the pressures young people face from social media.
Meanwhile John Edwards, the incoming head of the UK's data watchdog, has "gone on the record" to say [16]he will be fair and impartial in his dealings with tech companies despite once describing Facebook as "morally bankrupt pathological liars." ®
Get our [17]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-facebook-files-11631713039
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YUiwORLsvDjiYCIoVFWdQAAAAM0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YUiwORLsvDjiYCIoVFWdQAAAAM0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YUiwORLsvDjiYCIoVFWdQAAAAM0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YUiwORLsvDjiYCIoVFWdQAAAAM0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/09/20/shutterstock_nick_clegg.jpg
[7] https://about.fb.com/news/2021/09/what-the-wall-street-journal-got-wrong/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YUiwORLsvDjiYCIoVFWdQAAAAM0&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/10/facebook_ireland/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/04/facebook_drops_trump/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2018/10/19/facebook_hires_nick_clegg/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2018/11/15/facebook_pr_nightmare/
[13] https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/blumenthal-and-blackburn-announce-probe-into-facebook-coverup-of-its-platforms-negative-impact-on-teens_children
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/16/nadine_dorries_dcms_appointment_comment/
[15] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9958275/Children-scarred-craze-Instagram-Face-writes-health-minister-NADINE-DORRIES.html
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2021/09/13/new_uk_ico_promises_to/
[17] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
I was going say that I was surprised Clegg was still at Facebook/surely it's past the time when Clegg was of some use to Zuckerberg - looks like I was sadly mistaken.l
I don't know how a british politician can bear to work with morally bankrupt pathological liars...again.
I don't know how a british politician morally bankrupt pathological liar can bear to work with morally bankrupt pathological liars...again.
FTFY.
...he will be fair and impartial in his dealings with tech companies despite once describing Facebook as " morally bankrupt pathological liars. "
What's wrong with that?
It's the truth and if he is embarrassed about it how can he be "fair and impartial" if he is changing his tune before he even starts the job in a way that looks like he is taking Facebook's side already?
If you're going to sell your soul to the devil, I guess you have to get used to working for merely evil people first.
Re: "I don't know how a british politician can bear (...anything...)"
Ooh! Ooh!I know that one: "money"!
This being the same Nick Clegg who said that the Lib Dems would never charge for education - then went ahead and did exactly that?
It's like asking a wolf to mind the sheep.
I understand why this one particular compromise still angers so many people who had to pay the increased fees but let's not forget that the Liberals used that concession to secure some major civil liberties wins, which are still with us. Most notably, killing Identity Cards - my personal most concerning issue at that election, as a lifelong Liberal voter.
Don't forget that tuition fees had been introduced by a previous government - the issue for the coalition was whether to increase them.
Which other Liberal manifesto commitments would you have preferred them to give up to get into government, instead of the fees increase? I am genuinely interested to know.
I am only angry that the AV referendum was screwed up! That is the most significant lasting problem from that time.
Personally, as a Liberal voter, I would like the Liberal Democrats to learn to be both liberal and democratic, as the current party is neither.
Most notably, killing Identity Cards
“That is not dead which can eternal lie"
Identity cards are a Home Office goal. The idea turns up every decade or so, whatever party happens to be in power. The excuses vary to match the party's particular bugbear – "ID cards will help prevent crime", "ID cards will make benefits easier to manage" – but the aim is to get us all to have a single official identity. The only way to stop it is to have a root and branch reform of the Home Office and no political party will do that.
The latest: "Voter ID will stop electoral fraud"
[1]There were only two cautions and four convictions for voter fraud in 2019
I'm pretty sure requiring ID for voting will disenfranchise more than six people.
[1] https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who-we-are-and-what-we-do/our-views-and-research/our-research/electoral-fraud-data/2019-electoral-fraud-data
The last time the lib dems had any power was when they were writing the agreement with the tories for the coalition. Then the coalition started, and they were scapegoats.
The tories would probably have agreed to a clause that said "we won't vote for anything that breaks one of our pledges". "The AV referendum will have to follow election commission rules" would probably have been harder to get through.
Also the same LibDems pledging decriminalisation of drugs only to back prohibition when they got their own drugs minister.
It's like asking a wolf to mind the sheep.
The picture of Clegg doesn't look like a wolf, it looks like a man in existential despair, as if he thought he was staring into the abyss and suddenly realised it was a mirror.
Faecebook defense 101
We operate as a black box, opaque to all you plebs.
The problems you have reported have already been dealt with by update X to our black box.
Now go away, there is nothing to see and less to worry about.
Re: Faecebook defense 101
In case anyone is in any doubt, Clegg is defending this here:
[1]Madness on stills (Byline TV video, 2m14s)
[1] https://twitter.com/BylineTV/status/1439643928081412105
Incapable or unwilling?
The article says that the US politicians believe that FaceBook is incapable of holding itself to account. I don't agree, I think they are perfectly capable of holding themselves to account - they just find it more profitable not to, and so I'd say "unwilling"
Re: Incapable or unwilling?
Holding to account is the job of the accountants ...
In this Facebook is no different than any other big, ruthless corporation.
Re: Incapable or unwilling?
In that respect, I'd be interested to know if Clegg even knows what research has been conducted or is simply attaching his face to a statement prepared by the press office.
Intelligence
Facebook exists only because they have a very granular database of almost everyone's life. It's a goldmine for security services, so they are allowed to do whatever they want. Plus they can facilitate censorship on behalf of the government bypassing the constitution.
So really the fuss only exists because of some brave journalists that have access to media platforms that are not yet censored.
If we didn't have those journalists, would you ever hear about Facebook being up to no good? I doubt it. It would be another conspiracy theory.
He really is a disgrace. If only there was a way for the LibDems to distance themselves from this odious twerp. He’s done untold damage to the LibDems - if only he could be relied upon to do the same for Facebook.
“It’s a claim which could only be made by cherry-picking selective quotes from individual pieces of leaked material in a way that presents complex and nuanced issues as if there is only ever one right answer,” he wrote. "
Enough about how to be a politician Mr.Clegg, now answer the damn question.