News: 1631700070

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Ex-DJI veep: There was no drone at Gatwick during 2018's hysterical shutdown

(2021/09/15)


There was never a rogue drone at Gatwick Airport that caused planes to be grounded over the 2018 Christmas holidays, an outgoing exec at Chinese drone-maker DJI has claimed.

In an interview given just before he takes up his new veep of governmental affairs post with Boston Dynamics, Brendan Schulman said it was "now clear" that [1]the event "did not actually involve a drone."

I can now comfortably say this as someone no longer in the industry, because it won't be attributed to an industry company who might sensationally be accused of being in denial

Between 19-21 December 2018, all flights at Gatwick Airport were halted after reports that a drone was flying around the airport's southern perimeter. Initially a routine safety precaution, the shutdown was extended for days as members of the public kept calling in drone sightings to police – who had failed to mention they were flying their own drone around the airport to try and spot the errant craft.

Speaking to industry [2]news site DroneDJ, Schulman continued: "The documents uncovered by Freedom of Information Act requests, showing an utter lack of evidence of any drone being present, have made this quite clear."

Those FoI requests were carried out by Ian Hudson of drone enthusiast site UAVHive. He summarised them on his Airprox Reality Check [3]website , which is devoted to asserting that pilots reporting drone sightings are usually wrong.

[4]

Schulman added: "I can now comfortably say this as someone no longer in the industry, because it won't be attributed to an industry company who might sensationally be accused of being in denial."

[5]

[6]

DJI is one of the world's dominant makers of consumer and prosumer drones. For a former senior US-facing veep to categorically say that drones weren't involved in the hugely expensive shutdown of Britain's second airport during peak travel season is a big snub to British investigators who insisted there was definitely something there.

[7]Three thousand sea birds abandon nests amid nature reserve drone crash hullabaloo

[8]Dangerous flying car drone zoomed into UK's Gatwick Airport airspace after killswitch failed

[9]'A guy in a jetpack' seen flying at 3,000ft within few hundred yards of passenger jet landing at LA airport

[10]Couple wrongly arrested over Gatwick Airport drone debacle score £200k payout from cops

Philip Rowse, CTO of drone company Cubepilot, told The Register : "At the first sign of trouble at Gatwick, I offered our assistance to the Sussex Police. As the lead of the hardware design team that has brought the majority (apart from DJI) of autopilots to the market worldwide either directly, or having had Chinese copies of our gear hit the market, I am very well aware of what unmanned systems can and cannot do."

He added: "Yet... no pictures of a drone!"

Sussex Police gave up on its investigation a year after the incident, [11]having wasted £790,000 of public money chasing after shadows . The only two arrests were of a local couple maliciously reported to police by a neighbour; they were paid £200k by Sussex Police in return for dropping a wrongful arrest lawsuit against the force. The total cost of the blundering police investigation alone is therefore estimated at just under £1m.

[12]

Various newspapers later reported that the shutdown had cost airlines around the world £50m in total. The Guardian [13]went into some depth about the incident in an investigation published in 2020, concluding that evidence of a drone actually being present was minimal.

Despite the investigations coming to nothing, Britain went on to pass various laws permitting police to [14]fine children £2,500 for playing with toy helicopters within three miles (4.82km) of any licensed airfield . ®

Get our [15]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2018/12/20/london_gatwick_airport_drones/

[2] https://dronedj.com/2021/09/13/brendan-schulman-reflects-on-his-dji-career-and-the-industry-a-dronedj-exclusive/

[3] https://www.airproxrealitycheck.org/gatwick2018/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/edgeiot&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YUIYvj3QiMRDJ@ksQ0UPxQAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/edgeiot&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YUIYvj3QiMRDJ@ksQ0UPxQAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/edgeiot&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YUIYvj3QiMRDJ@ksQ0UPxQAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/07/drones_blamed_for_bird_disaster/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/19/airspeeder_alauda_drone_investigation_with_photos/

[9] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/01/jetpack_aviator_lax/

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2020/06/15/gatwick_drone_couple_payout/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2019/09/27/gatwick_drone_probe_closed_sussex_police/

[12] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offprem/edgeiot&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YUIYvj3QiMRDJ@ksQ0UPxQAAANI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[13] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/dec/01/the-mystery-of-the-gatwick-drone

[14] https://www.theregister.com/2019/01/22/ukgov_plans_2500_fines_kids_flying_toy_helicopters_3_miles_aiports/

[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Disgusted Of Tunbridge Wells

Logically, if it wasn't a drone, it must have been aliens...

LogicGate

Incorrect, it was a UFO, and it will remain assuch until identified (as a duck that repeats "you bloody fool" again and again).

Disgusted Of Tunbridge Wells

You'll notice that the article doesn't deny that it was aliens...

Follow the money

Adrian 4

If the end 'benefit' was to those elements who like to ensure there's a law to cover every eventuality, that's where the finger of suspicion for starting the panic should point.

Re: Follow the money

Wellyboot

There are laws that cover every eventuality already, "Breach of the peace" would work here it covers almost any situation where harm could be inflicted.

There has been a long list of offences added recently, mostly to show something is 'being done' but tbh the ability to gain a fair conviction is more important than the specific name of the offence.

Re: Follow the money

W.S.Gosset

> There are laws that cover every eventuality already

E.g., "No visible means of support"

Criminalises the use of all drones, already.

Also helicopter pilots. So hide your helicopter if you see another such debacle in the offing. No sense asking for trouble.

werdsmith

I felt that there was a drone in the first sighting, probably a misguided Youtubist who got scared and went to ground. There after all sightings were phantom.

Anonymous Coward

What kind of drone-sensitive organ do you posess to have "felt" its presence?

Anonymous Coward

Let's just call it a gut feeling, and I always trust my gut!

Right now it's telling me ...

I'm hungry

Just another UFO

Pete 2

> a big snub to British investigators who insisted there was definitely something there.

It was unidentified.

It was flying (maybe)

It was an object (possibly)

All that adds up to is more unexplained sightings. Some of which might have been real. None of which prove anything.

That must be...

Spanners

the most unsurprising technical(ish) news of the year. I was sceptical of it at the time and heard my feelings being called "irresponsible" by politicians who were quoting the official tabloid line

Stealth cloak, anybody?

steelpillow

Proof the Chinese* have developed a stealth cloak.

Clearly left the zipper undone and was spotted just before it could do it up properly. What's the Mandarin for "Ooh! matron!"?

* Ok, enough China-baiting: obviously the Russians or the CIA (who are the same people lizards anyway).

Re: Stealth cloak, anybody?

W.S.Gosset

I developed a stealth cloak myself, once.

No idea where the bloody thing is.

Re: Stealth cloak, anybody?

Sam Therapy

Well, I'm not bloody well lending you mine. Wherever it is.

Er, not quite!

Peter Christy

Actually, there WAS a drone there. After the initial scare, the police sent their own up to try and catch the (non-existent) miscreant. This triggered a further wave of reports, making the situation worse than it was originally.

Since then, plod has been remarkably quiet on the subject, though it is common knowledge in "certain circles"...

--

Pete

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social
sciences' is: some do, some don't.
-- Ernest Rutherford