NFT or not to NFT: Steve Jobs' first job application auction shows physically unique beats cryptographically unique
- Reference: 1627563668
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/07/29/steve_jobs_nft_auction_race/
- Source link:
Set up by former ad exec Olly Joshi and [1]launched last week , the auction took a physical piece of history – the 1973 handwritten job application, which Joshi [2]purchased at auction earlier this year with money raised by a collective of 36 of his friends and family – ran it through a scanner and created a cryptographically verified NFT version on the Ethereum blockchain before listing the two side-by-side.
The idea was to pit NFTs, digital goods whose uniqueness comes from cryptographic signatures placed on a cryptocurrency blockchain but which are otherwise infinitely duplicable, against physical and genuinely unique goods – and to make a little money along the way.
[3]
Physical/NFT Steve Jobs application
The auction has now closed, and in a twist surprising all involved – even those running the physical auction – the real thing attracted vastly more interest than the NFT, closing higher than its digital twin.
For Joshi, and the members of his collective, the $343,000 closing price for the physical lot is an impressive return for a few months' work. The job application was acquired at auction in March this year for $224,750, after selling in 2018 for $174,757 and in 2017 for just $18,750 – giving the collective's coffers a $118,250 boost even before funds from the sale of the NFT were added to the pot.
[4]Former ad exec sticks Steve Jobs' 1973 job application in a scanner for physical-versus-digital NFT auction
[5]Sir Tim Berners-Lee's World Wide Web NFT fetches $5.4m at auction while rest of us gaze upon source code for $0
[6]Gone in 60 electrons: Digital art swaggers down the cul-de-sac of obsolescence
[7]WTH are NFTs? Here is the token, there is the Beeple....
Predictions that the NFT would raise more money than the piece of paper, as with the work of digital artist Mike "Beeple" Winkelman which sold for [8]a whopping $69m earlier this year, fell flat, however. "My gut says the NFT will attract the highest bid," Sarah Buchanan, director of auction software house Snoofa and host of the physical auction, told us when the auction went live, "but let's see."
Joshi told The Register :
It was fascinating to watch the head-to-head auction come to a close last night. This was a social experiment and we put the power in the pockets of the public. The results clearly show that, on this occasion, people felt the physical job application held more value than its digital counterpart. It will be interesting to see if the perception of the value of digital assets shifts in the near future, and whether it's time we think differently.
What we've seen now the race has run is a gulf in final sale value between the genuinely one-of-a-kind physical artefact and the popped-it-into-a-scanner cryptographically unique but otherwise quickly duplicated NFT, which sold for $23,182.02 – a decent chunk of change for a JPEG, to be sure, but nowhere near the value placed on the physical lot.
Speaking to The Register ahead of the auction's opening, Joshi had downplayed concerns that the ability to easily make a digital copy of the physical lot and turn it into another NFT – or a million other NFTs – would push down the value. "Value is transferred once," he told us. "So we would be first to do it, therefore that [NFT] is the first one, and it will retain its value for that reason."
[9]
Bidders, clearly, disagreed.
[10]
In total, the auction raised $366,202.22 for Joshi and pals. A percentage of the profit will be distributed to One Laptop Per Child and the Cancer Research Institute – but Joshi has yet to quantify exactly what percentage that might be. Secondary sales of the NFT, tracked via Rarible which handled the digital side of the auction, will also generate a donation to both charities. ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/21/steve_jobs_application_nft_auction/
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/19/steve_jobs_job_application/
[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/07/20/sjja_press_landscape_6.jpg
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/21/steve_jobs_application_nft_auction/
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/01/world_wide_web_nft_auction/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/07/something_for_the_weekend/
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/04/what_is_nft/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/04/what_is_nft/
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YQLQrTmrCAp64oWaTBb89AAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YQLQrTmrCAp64oWaTBb89AAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Presumably....
Yes, you absolutely can and there are definitely cases of people creating NFTs for things they have nothing to do with and making bank already. There's also nothing stopping multiple NFTs for the same thing. At the end of the day an NFT isn't proof of anything at all and has no useful value at all other than reselling to the next sucker. They're the virtual equivalent of a void replica deed to a property.
Also because creating an NFT is significantly more complex than creating a cryptocoin they're many, many times as environmentally impacting to boot. The average NFT emits as much carbon as a cross country drive, and the more they're bid on/transferred/sold the worse it gets, it's not just at time of manufacture but continuous and forever.
I saw someone describe them as an ecological nightmare pyramid scheme, and that's pretty much right on. At least tulip bulbs could be planted into tulips.
For sale now!
NFT of a bridge! Unique! Limited to one! Buy now!
Re: For sale now!
Would you consider an exchange for some clothes?
Brand new - made for an emperor ...
' "My gut says the NFT will attract the highest bid," Sarah Buchanan, director of auction software house Snoofa.'
Did she use to work for Gartner?
wtf. so physical thing on scrappy old paper is worth more than imaginary thing conjured out of nothing?
who'd have thought it.
The truth
[1]For those who don't know the truth about Steve Jobs.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3s-qZsjK8I
Someone fundamentally misunderstood NFTs
They were auctioning ownership of a copy of the original document, and were then surprised that it went for less money than the actual original document? That's like expecting obvious recreations of the Mona Lisa to sell for more than the Mona Lisa itself!
They could have tied the NFT to ownership of the original document itself, thus the NFT would be a cryptographic (and public) attestation of ownership of the original document. That could then provide a protection against theft or forgeries, such as if you were to buy the document, and the NFT is transferred to you, but later find out you were given a forgery, you would still be considered the legitimate owner of the original if it were to be uncovered, rather than just being a schmuck with a worthless piece of paper.
Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood NFTs
you would still be considered the legitimate owner of the original if it were to be uncovered
On what basis?
Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization
Surely to maximise returns for your favourite charity, the trick is to sell the NFT of the incredibly collectible and historic bit of paper first. Then when the hubbub dies down, sell the extraordinarily rare and covetable physical object.
Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization
Why not sell an NFT of the sales receipt as well? And then NFT of the sales receipt of an NFT? And then an NFT of an NFT of the sales receipt of an NFT? And then an NFT of an NFT of an NFT of the sales receipt of an NFT? ...
Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization
I enjoyed this post so much I'm offering it up as an NFT. Bids start at $1million.
Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization
Surely to maximise returns for your favourite charity, the trick is to sell the NFT of the incredibly collectible and historic bit of paper first. Then when the hubbub dies down, sell the extraordinarily rare and covetable physical object.
Word
"Value is transferred once," he told us. "So we would be first to do it, therefore that [NFT] is the first one, and it will retain its value for that reason."
Since he doesn't understand the meaning of that very first word, the rest of the statement has a predictable worth.
Presumably....
...I could just take an image of the document (perhaps by cropping the image in in this very article), and create a new NFT?
Which raises the question - why bother?