News: 1627563668

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

NFT or not to NFT: Steve Jobs' first job application auction shows physically unique beats cryptographically unique

(2021/07/29)


A dual-format auction of a physical and digital non-fungible token (NFT) version of a job application penned by Apple co-founder Steve Jobs has come to a close – and the physical side has emerged victorious, by an order of magnitude.

Set up by former ad exec Olly Joshi and [1]launched last week , the auction took a physical piece of history – the 1973 handwritten job application, which Joshi [2]purchased at auction earlier this year with money raised by a collective of 36 of his friends and family – ran it through a scanner and created a cryptographically verified NFT version on the Ethereum blockchain before listing the two side-by-side.

The idea was to pit NFTs, digital goods whose uniqueness comes from cryptographic signatures placed on a cryptocurrency blockchain but which are otherwise infinitely duplicable, against physical and genuinely unique goods – and to make a little money along the way.

[3]

Physical/NFT Steve Jobs application

The auction has now closed, and in a twist surprising all involved – even those running the physical auction – the real thing attracted vastly more interest than the NFT, closing higher than its digital twin.

For Joshi, and the members of his collective, the $343,000 closing price for the physical lot is an impressive return for a few months' work. The job application was acquired at auction in March this year for $224,750, after selling in 2018 for $174,757 and in 2017 for just $18,750 – giving the collective's coffers a $118,250 boost even before funds from the sale of the NFT were added to the pot.

[4]Former ad exec sticks Steve Jobs' 1973 job application in a scanner for physical-versus-digital NFT auction

[5]Sir Tim Berners-Lee's World Wide Web NFT fetches $5.4m at auction while rest of us gaze upon source code for $0

[6]Gone in 60 electrons: Digital art swaggers down the cul-de-sac of obsolescence

[7]WTH are NFTs? Here is the token, there is the Beeple....

Predictions that the NFT would raise more money than the piece of paper, as with the work of digital artist Mike "Beeple" Winkelman which sold for [8]a whopping $69m earlier this year, fell flat, however. "My gut says the NFT will attract the highest bid," Sarah Buchanan, director of auction software house Snoofa and host of the physical auction, told us when the auction went live, "but let's see."

Joshi told The Register :

It was fascinating to watch the head-to-head auction come to a close last night. This was a social experiment and we put the power in the pockets of the public. The results clearly show that, on this occasion, people felt the physical job application held more value than its digital counterpart. It will be interesting to see if the perception of the value of digital assets shifts in the near future, and whether it's time we think differently.

What we've seen now the race has run is a gulf in final sale value between the genuinely one-of-a-kind physical artefact and the popped-it-into-a-scanner cryptographically unique but otherwise quickly duplicated NFT, which sold for $23,182.02 – a decent chunk of change for a JPEG, to be sure, but nowhere near the value placed on the physical lot.

Speaking to The Register ahead of the auction's opening, Joshi had downplayed concerns that the ability to easily make a digital copy of the physical lot and turn it into another NFT – or a million other NFTs – would push down the value. "Value is transferred once," he told us. "So we would be first to do it, therefore that [NFT] is the first one, and it will retain its value for that reason."

[9]

Bidders, clearly, disagreed.

[10]

In total, the auction raised $366,202.22 for Joshi and pals. A percentage of the profit will be distributed to One Laptop Per Child and the Cancer Research Institute – but Joshi has yet to quantify exactly what percentage that might be. Secondary sales of the NFT, tracked via Rarible which handled the digital side of the auction, will also generate a donation to both charities. ®

Get our [11]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/21/steve_jobs_application_nft_auction/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/19/steve_jobs_job_application/

[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/07/20/sjja_press_landscape_6.jpg

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/21/steve_jobs_application_nft_auction/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/01/world_wide_web_nft_auction/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/07/something_for_the_weekend/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/04/what_is_nft/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/04/what_is_nft/

[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YQLQrTmrCAp64oWaTBb89AAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[10] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YQLQrTmrCAp64oWaTBb89AAAAA4&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/



Presumably....

Paul Williams

...I could just take an image of the document (perhaps by cropping the image in in this very article), and create a new NFT?

Which raises the question - why bother?

Re: Presumably....

Geez Money

Yes, you absolutely can and there are definitely cases of people creating NFTs for things they have nothing to do with and making bank already. There's also nothing stopping multiple NFTs for the same thing. At the end of the day an NFT isn't proof of anything at all and has no useful value at all other than reselling to the next sucker. They're the virtual equivalent of a void replica deed to a property.

Also because creating an NFT is significantly more complex than creating a cryptocoin they're many, many times as environmentally impacting to boot. The average NFT emits as much carbon as a cross country drive, and the more they're bid on/transferred/sold the worse it gets, it's not just at time of manufacture but continuous and forever.

I saw someone describe them as an ecological nightmare pyramid scheme, and that's pretty much right on. At least tulip bulbs could be planted into tulips.

For sale now!

trevorde

NFT of a bridge! Unique! Limited to one! Buy now!

Re: For sale now!

Blofeld's Cat

Would you consider an exchange for some clothes?

Brand new - made for an emperor ...

DJV

' "My gut says the NFT will attract the highest bid," Sarah Buchanan, director of auction software house Snoofa.'

Did she use to work for Gartner?

myhandler

wtf. so physical thing on scrappy old paper is worth more than imaginary thing conjured out of nothing?

who'd have thought it.

The truth

elsergiovolador

[1]For those who don't know the truth about Steve Jobs.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3s-qZsjK8I

Someone fundamentally misunderstood NFTs

Anonymous Coward

They were auctioning ownership of a copy of the original document, and were then surprised that it went for less money than the actual original document? That's like expecting obvious recreations of the Mona Lisa to sell for more than the Mona Lisa itself!

They could have tied the NFT to ownership of the original document itself, thus the NFT would be a cryptographic (and public) attestation of ownership of the original document. That could then provide a protection against theft or forgeries, such as if you were to buy the document, and the NFT is transferred to you, but later find out you were given a forgery, you would still be considered the legitimate owner of the original if it were to be uncovered, rather than just being a schmuck with a worthless piece of paper.

Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood NFTs

elsergiovolador

you would still be considered the legitimate owner of the original if it were to be uncovered

On what basis?

Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization

SW10

Surely to maximise returns for your favourite charity, the trick is to sell the NFT of the incredibly collectible and historic bit of paper first. Then when the hubbub dies down, sell the extraordinarily rare and covetable physical object.

Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization

elsergiovolador

Why not sell an NFT of the sales receipt as well? And then NFT of the sales receipt of an NFT? And then an NFT of an NFT of the sales receipt of an NFT? And then an NFT of an NFT of an NFT of the sales receipt of an NFT? ...

Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization

Geez Money

I enjoyed this post so much I'm offering it up as an NFT. Bids start at $1million.

Re: Someone fundamentally misunderstood profit maximization

SW10

Surely to maximise returns for your favourite charity, the trick is to sell the NFT of the incredibly collectible and historic bit of paper first. Then when the hubbub dies down, sell the extraordinarily rare and covetable physical object.

Word

Anonymous Coward

"Value is transferred once," he told us. "So we would be first to do it, therefore that [NFT] is the first one, and it will retain its value for that reason."

Since he doesn't understand the meaning of that very first word, the rest of the statement has a predictable worth.

If you have received a letter inviting you to speak at the dedication of a
new cat hospital, and you hate cats, your reply, declining the invitation,
does not necessarily have to cover the full range of your emotions. You must
make it clear that you will not attend, but you do not have to let fly at cats.
The writer of the letter asked a civil question; attack cats, then, only if
you can do so with good humor, good taste, and in such a way that your answer
will be courteous as well as responsive. Since you are out of sympathy with
cats, you may quite properly give this as a reason for not appearing at the
dedication ceremonies of a cat hospital. But bear in mind that your opinion
of cats was not sought, only your services as a speaker. Try to keep things
straight.
-- Strunk and White, "The Elements of Style"