Arm chief hits out at 'ill-informed speculation' over proposed Nvidia buyout
- Reference: 1625512266
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/07/05/arm_chief_nvidia_buyout/
- Source link:
[1]Writing in a company blog at the weekend , Simon Segars, chief exec of Arm, was quick to latch onto the significance of the "history-making" deal while dismissing what he described as the "ill-informed speculation out there about what the future of Arm with Nvidia will look like."
The proposed deal has been repeatedly attacked on multiple fronts, not least by its customers and potential investors.
[2]
Taking aim at critics, Segars said: "Some believe that an initial public offering (IPO) would have been a better path. Others are concerned that Arm will leave the UK, while some have fears that Arm will become anti-competitive. These assumptions couldn't be further from the truth, and I'd like to address them head-on."
[3]
[4]
Segars' comments come as the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) puts the finishing touches on its analysis of the proposed buyout, which is due to be handed to the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport by the end of the month.
The UK's digital secretary, Oliver Dowden, increased tensions around the proposed deal when he took a personal interest in the case in April, issuing [5]a Public Interest Intervention Notice (PIIN) amid concerns that the sale could raise issues around national security.
[6]
Segars' public intervention so close to the CMA's deadline is a sign that things are ramping up.
[7]Nvidia adds Arm support to its 5G kit, and a 16-core BlueField DPU to speed up edge, HPC
[8]Intel to put SiFive's latest CPU cores into 7nm dev system to woo customers to RISC-V
[9]VMware’s ESXi-on-Arm adds support for two-socket servers, Nvidia boards
[10]Intel made $2bn+ takeover offer for RISC-V chip darling SiFive – report
Addressing concerns that may keep ministers and policymakers awake at night, Segars said: "Arm will remain headquartered in the UK, and we will be able to increase our investment in UK-based talent. The UK is already recognized as one of the leaders of AI research and academia; together with Nvidia we have the ambition to evolve the UK into the centre of the AI world."
He went on: "Nvidia will not siphon investment away from the UK. Instead, it will invest in the expansion of Arm's Cambridge HQ and build a world-class AI research facility. The combination of Arm's technology with Nvidia's deep expertise in AI will make the UK the leader in research, innovation and scientific discovery for decades to come."
Turning his attention away from strategic concerns, he sought to address fears that the buyout could be seen as being anti-competitive.
"We'll invest with Nvidia to create new markets, not displace customers in existing ones," said Segars. "This transaction opens up access to even more innovation that the entire semiconductor industry can harness."
[11]
And in a bid to play down the significance of other forms of funding, Segars said the company "contemplated an IPO" but opted for long-term investment over the "pressure to deliver short-term revenue growth and profitability."
But not everyone is happy. Richard Holway, chairman at research goup TechMarketView and long-term fan of Arm, was unimpressed by Segars' comments. He maintained today that "Arm's real strength is that it is customer agnostic."
"Under Nvidia's ownership, it would be anything but. Indeed, that is why so many of its customers – like Qualcomm, Microsoft, and Google – are so against the deal that they are prepared to launch a consortium to back a relist to retain Arm's independence," he said.
Denting Segars' claims about an IPO, the TMV analyst claimed Arm's success was built on the fact that it first floated on the London Stock Exchange in 1998 and remained a UK publicly quoted company for the next 18 years. During that time, he said, it grew from a tiny company to a "global force responsible for the design of chips used in 98 per cent of the world's smartphones."
The [12]CMA's deadline for submitting its report to the Secretary of State is 30 July 2021. ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.arm.com/blogs/blueprint/arm-nvidia
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YOOBAPrmrhSxafmXzoHKbQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YOOBAPrmrhSxafmXzoHKbQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YOOBAPrmrhSxafmXzoHKbQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/19/digital_secretary_oliver_dowden_nivida_arm/
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YOOBAPrmrhSxafmXzoHKbQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/28/nvidia_mwc/
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/22/sifive_performance_p550_intel/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/16/vmware_esxi_arm_ampere_server_support/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/10/intel_sifive_takeover_offer/
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YOOBAPrmrhSxafmXzoHKbQAAAJA&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/nvidia-slash-arm-merger-inquiry
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Different way
I think ARM should be nationalised and become an IT equivalent of NHS.
Re: Different way
Then it could be as great as INMOS
Where was all this concern when ARM was being sold off to SoftBank several years ago? That seemed to sail through with nary a peep.
The thinking seems to be that Softbank is an investment vehicle, whereas Nvidia is a customer of and potential competitor to ARM.
At least I think that's right.
How will it not damage competition
NVidia could call first dibs on any technology it likes. Executives could whisper secrets in each others ears about contracts, specifications etc and gain a commercial advantage over rivals. ARM execs could be financially motivated to work in the interests of NVidia before rivals, e.g. prioritising projects. Fabs and subcontractors might offer preferential rates to NVidia that they didn't before. Just the mere threat of any of these things might dampen investor interest in rival technologies. So I'm sure there are a multitude of ways it could affect competition.
Aside from all that WTF is Britain thinking to sell one of its few homegrown success stories to America? It's insane.
Re: How will it not damage competition
Aside from all that WTF is Britain thinking to sell one of its few homegrown success stories to America? It's insane.
Capitalism knows no borders.
Re: How will it not damage competition
ARM was sold years ago.
Re: How will it not damage competition
Indeed, all to be taken with a pinch of salt.
I wonder if anyone will remember the quote “Arm will remain headquartered in the UK, and we will be able to increase our investment in UK-based talent.” in 5 years time when the NVidia board (and it will be their decision, not his) decide not to?
Will
"we will be able to increase our investment in UK-based talent"
not equals
"we will increase our investment in UK-based talent"
Let's see, we're supposed to ignore "ill-informed speculation out there about what the future of Arm with Nvidia will look like." Fair enough; I wonder what kind of speculation that might include? It's easy to imagine that someone who's never been an nvidia customer or seen how they treat their customers and competitors might think things like:
"We'll invest with Nvidia to create new markets, not displace customers in existing ones"
and maybe
"This transaction opens up access to even more innovation that the entire semiconductor industry can harness."
and perhaps even the general
"...fears that Arm will become anti-competitive..."
Those are indeed ill-informed positions one could take if one were ignorant of nvidia's behaviour in the marketplace. Heaven forfend we be so foolish as to believe such things. Thankfully we have some sensible canned statements from Mr Holway to set us right.
One question : this are all in the paper ?
All this are coming from a corporation that are know to NOT fulfills its promises , I just want to know if all this ARE IN THE buyout contract, or it will be just words in the wind ???