Russia spoofed AIS data to fake British warship's course days before Crimea guns showdown
- Reference: 1624560430
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/06/24/russia_ais_spoofing/
- Source link:
Yesterday Defender briefly sailed through Ukrainian waters, triggering the Russian Navy and coastguard into sending patrol boats and anti-shipping aircraft to [1]buzz the British warship in a fruitless effort to divert her away from occupied Crimea's waters.
Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 and has occupied parts of the region, mostly in the Crimean peninsula, ever since. The UK and other NATO allies do not recognise Ukraine as enemy-held territory so Defender was sailing through an ally's waters – and doing so through a published traffic separation scheme (similar to the TSS in the English Channel), as Defence Secretary Ben Wallace [2]confirmed this afternoon .*
[3]
Yet, among yesterday's drama and tension, Russia had previously spoofed maritime Automatic Identification System (AIS) signals to show Defender and her Dutch flotilla mate HNLMS Evertsen as sailing straight for the Russian naval base in Sevastopol, southwest Crimea. Neither warship was doing that: while Russia was claiming NATO warships were threatening Russia, both vessels were captured on live webcams in another Ukrainian port.
[4]
[5]
The latest batch of AIS fiddling took place on 17 June, according to naval analyst HI Sutton, writing for the US Naval Institute's [6]blog : "Despite the AIS track, there is clear evidence that the two warships did not leave Odessa."
This week's tensions should remind the world that Russia has no compunction about interfering with widely available tech systems.
[7]
Open-source intelligence expert Steffan Watkins told The Register : "From a technical perspective, the receivers that were collecting the AIS transmissions (VHF, limited to line of sight) HI Sutton reported were in Chornomorsk, Crimea, quite near where [HMS Defender would sail yesterday. A nefarious RF transmitter nearby, in a vehicle, ship, or stationary location, remotely controlled, or not, seems most likely to have been the source; that's a lot of options, but these days the sort of transmitter needed could fit in a backpack, if not a purse."
[8]US Navy starts an earthquake to see how its newest carrier withstands combat conditions
[9]UK spends £36m on 18 little 'bullet-proof' boats to protect Royal Navy assets
[10]Royal Navy and Air Force get low-code bridge in UK military recruitment saga
[11]Just let this sink in: Capita wins 12-year £1bn contract to provide training services to the Royal Navy and Marines
AIS works on an honesty-based system, at its simplest. The all-but-mandatory system (ships below 300 tons are exempt) works through each ship at sea broadcasting its GPS coordinates. Other ships receive those signals and assemble them onto display screens mounted on the vessel's bridge for crew to monitor, usually as part of an integrated ECDIS system. It's an insecure system insofar as vulns exist that allow spoofing of AIS data, as [12]first revealed almost a decade ago . Shore stations can also receive and rebroadcast AIS signals, amplifying them – and providing a vector for the unscrupulous to insert their own preferred data.
As those revelations suggested, AIS tampering is far from new. The US Centre for Advanced Warfare, a think-tank, warned in 2019 that Russian [13]tampering with GPS location systems revealed efforts to develop "a comparative advantage in the targeted use and development of GNSS spoofing capabilities to achieve tactical and strategic objectives."
Watkins explained that if Russia's forces were broadcasting false AIS tracks, evidence of that might have been picked up by NATO observers, saying: "Multiple AIS providers collected the bogus AIS transmissions, so we know it was not a cyber attack injecting data onto any one database. Since the attacker was transmitting VHF over the air, there is a possibility that an American SIGINT collection platform captured, or even triangulated, the source of the transmissions."
AIS spoofing is similar to GPS spoofing in that broadcasting false data can mislead the wider world. Back in 2018, researchers [14]built a GPS-spoofing unit out of a Raspberry Pi , transmitting false location data to confuse a targeted car's satnav.
[15]
This proof-of-concept unit using consumer-grade, readily available equipment merely spells out what nation states such as Russia (and the West, naturally) have been toying with for years. Western GPS spoofing is a fact of life in the Eastern Mediterranean, as [16]frustrated airline pilots and air traffic controllers know all too well , and the effects of AIS spoofing are very similar for those who depend on public datafeeds to keep up with the world around them.
For now, though, the decades-old game of "tweaking the bear's tail" continues – and doubtless both East and West will keep on tampering with AIS and GPS feeds whenever it suits them to do so. ®
Bootnote
*Wallace's statement downplays the Russian coastguard's firing of guns near HMS Defender and refers to it as "a live fire gunnery exercise… astern" [behind] the British ship.
Accounts from both the Daily Mail (linked above) [17]and the BBC , both of which have correspondents embedded aboard the ship, revealed that the Russian coastguard boats were firing guns near the British warship. Not directly at the Defender , but after repeatedly demanding she change course away from Ukrainian waters.
Get our [18]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9718661/Read-dramatic-eyewitness-report-Vladimir-Putin-gunboat-opens-fire.html
[2] https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2021-06-24/hcws122
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YNUAeWFnq@FaPBkS8FTbowAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YNUAeWFnq@FaPBkS8FTbowAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YNUAeWFnq@FaPBkS8FTbowAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://news.usni.org/2021/06/21/positions-of-two-nato-ships-were-falsified-near-russian-black-sea-naval-base
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YNUAeWFnq@FaPBkS8FTbowAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/22/us_navy_creates_earthquake/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/16/royal_navy_police_boats/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/04/navy_and_airforce_get_lowcode/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2020/12/18/capita_navy_training/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2013/10/17/ais_hacked_trend_micro_ships_wrecked/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2019/04/02/gps_spoofing_russia/
[14] https://www.theregister.com/2018/07/16/researchers_hack_gps/
[15] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YNUAeWFnq@FaPBkS8FTbowAAAAs&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/05/gps_jamming_eurocontrol/
[17] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-57583363
[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: To sadly turn this political
As any player of the board game will tell you, it isn't a threat, it's Diplomacy.
China - invading the South "China" Sea
North Korea - invading Japanese fishing grounds
India - Bottling up the Pakistani navy
USA - Intimidating everyone... etc. etc. etc.
Re: Diplomacy
Too late for that, Russia has just announced that they will BOMB any ship that passes 'unauthorized' (by them) within the waters
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britain-says-dont-get-carried-away-by-warship-spat-with-russia-2021-06-24/
Re: To blatantly unnecessarily turn this political
FTFY. Mr Trump hasn't been in office for almost 6 months now, and this incident didn't involve the USA. If it had, the threat assessment would be conducted by people who are not Mr Trump and have instead been appointed or left in their positions at Mr Biden's discretion. Let it go already.
What's the real threat exactly? The Royal Navy's job is to sail into potentially dangerous situations and keep the peace for the UK merchant marine. That's what they were doing. These kinds of "exercises" and bullying are common on the high seas among maritime nations and have been for longer than there's been a Royal Navy. How much of a threat it really represents to anyone in the UK is an open question; it depends on how you think about diplomacy and international trade. Immiment threat to the physical safety of anyone in the UK? Nonexistent. Hazards to trade and sovereignty in and around continental Europe, especially for former USSR puppet states? Considerable.
Try to keep things in perspective, and avoid spurious injection of irrelevant domestic politics. We get it, you don't like Mr Trump. Almost no one does, but he's long gone and had little or nothing to do with this. That is, unless you want to make the case that to defend the UK (somehow?), he should have sent US troops and ships to Crimea to recapture it for Ukraine. No doubt had he done so, you would have complained about that too -- "imperialist aggression!!!" and such. And while we're at it, Russia's illegal annexation happened more than 2 years before Mr Trump took office, so if you want to blame a US President for the current mess in Ukraine or letting Mr Putin get away with the theft of Crimea, that'd be Mr Obama.
Since you want to play at geopolitics, how about suggesting what you would do here as the UK's defence secretary or the President of the USA? You know, to deal with the threat. Mr Trump's a fool; all right. What's your play then?
Re: To sadly turn this political
Unfortunately I think the US "pivot" towards the Pacific emboldened Russia whilst pissing off China. Although Russia might not have the latest military hardware they do have numbers and if you look at WWII they don't hesitate to use them.
AIS works on an honesty-based system, at its simplest.
Sure, because there's no way that could go wrong.
Whereas the alternative is; I'm going to ignore that bulk carrier heading toward me because I don't trust the Liberian agency that signed its authentication key
I believe in South Korea all boats regardless of size must have AIS onboard. AIS-A is required as usual for larger vessel, AIS-B for everything else. Tampering/fiddling etc. with it is a serious offencei think but I can't remember what the penalties are.
Just a FYI
The Crimea houses a number of Russia's military assets and has done so for literally hundreds of years (I think their naval presence dates back to the 18th century). Even during Soviet times when Khrushchev (a Ukraine native) made the peninsula part of Ukraine large areas were still Federal reservations. Given its strategic importance its unlikely that Russia would give up its bases to NATO just like that so pretending that Russia invaded Crimea is a bit fatuous, their forces were already firmly in place and are unlikely to be displaced.
Just for the record, I'm not Russian, I don't work for Russians and so on. I just happen to know some of the history of the area and kind of resent the continual attempts to rewrite it for mass consumption. I also think its rather silly sailing warships inside territorial waters, its just a provocation -- the Russians will have to do something, shoo it away like an annoying fly, but realistically they could blow the thing out of the water if they thought they had to. So we endanger one small ship and its crew for what? Impotent chest thumping.
Incidentally, its worth looking up the history of the Crimean war. It seems that not a whole lot has changed in British attitudes to Empire in nearly 200 years. Too bad the world has moved on.
Re: Just a FYI
Calais is a vital English base in our wars against the French, you can't expect us to give it up.
Re: Just a FYI
Holy false equivalence batman! Much as I have no love for the thieving (and murderous) Russian government I don't think that gunboat diplomacy by us helps the situation.
Re: Just a FYI
"their forces were already firmly in place and are unlikely to be displaced."
So its OK if the US army rolls out of Gitmo and takes Havana? They were already there, you know.
Shipping channel
The issue is a tricky one diplomatically. By having a RN ship in the Black Sea, the British Government has to decide on a course for it to sail. If it follows the channel referred to in the article, and approved by the Ukraine authorities who according to international law own the Crimea, then it is consistent with HMG's position on the Russian illegal annexation of Crimea. If, however, it avoids the region of sea claimed by Russia as their territorial waters, then it would be hailed by the Russians as de facto acceptance by the UK of Russia's ownership of the Crimea.
This was clearly a premeditated act to show the UK's position on Ukraine's sovereignty, and hopefully part of a well-thought out and sensible foreign policy strategy.
To sadly turn this political
And yet Das Cheetos and his gooze-stepping minions played off Russia as not a threat.
Any government that plays around with military hardware in order to try to gain a political advantage? That's a threat.