Canadian province's supreme court orders Dell to pay nearly $500,000 to sales rep fired in his twilight years
- Reference: 1623789187
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/06/15/canada_bc_court_dell_ruling_wrongful_dismissal/
- Source link:
The suit was filed
[2]PDF
by Vancouver resident James Hawes. Dell Canada fired Hawes on March 25, 2020, less than two weeks after British Columbia entered a province-wide state of emergency.The sales rep had 23 consecutive years of service under his belt, having initially joined Data General, which was acquired by the now Dell-owned EMC Corporation in 1999. At the time of his firing, he was 64.
[3]
Hawes claimed Dell Canada failed to provide a reasonable notice period, which he determined to be 24 months, based on his age, infirmity, and a jobs market flooded with newly fired sales executives. In court documents, counsel for the plaintiff cited a “recent and very serious injury” to his leg and knee which would hamper his ability to find suitable work.
[4]
[5]
Complicating matters, he was also bound by a one-year non-compete and non-solicitation agreement.
Although Dell offered a severance package that included a payout of C$40,769.23 ($33,464, £23,756), this was fraction of Hawes’ earnings, according to court documents
[6]PDF
. In the period between 2017 and 2019, his average annual earnings amounted to $392,249.60, taking into account performance bonuses. Dell’s proposed package also lacked pension contributions, and would have seen his life and disability insurance coverage terminated.[7]
In its response
[8]PDF
, Dell countered that as Hawes’ previous average salary was heavily influenced by performance, future payouts were not guaranteed, and were likely to be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.It also accused Hawes of disparaging the company to customers, and of acting in bad faith by discussing its settlement negotiations in a public forum. It pointed to a LinkedIn post where Hawes purportedly wrote: “Working on a massive settlement with Dell.”
Finding for the plaintiff, the Honourable Madam Justice Iyer ordered Dell to pay Hawes C$473,238 (about $388k, £275k), plus costs.
[9]
This figure was calculated based on a reasonable notice period of 21 months (three fewer than originally requested) and projected monthly earnings of C$24,792 ($20k, £14.4k).
In setting on the 21-month mark, Justice Iyer factored into account Hayes’ age, the non-compete and non-solicitation clauses in his contract, and the fact that he had been fired at the outset of the pandemic.
Fourteen months on, Hawes has yet to find gainful employment. Although the court found that he had not made a “constant and assiduous effort,” Justice Iyer did not factor this into her ruling, saying that Dell had failed to establish the matter in court, or provide evidence of relevant job opportunities.
We have asked Dell for comment. ®
Get our [10]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.bccourts.ca/jdb-txt/sc/21/11/2021BCSC1149.htm
[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/06/15/notice_of_civil_claim.pdf
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YMki-glReGmst0fPbW2lywAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YMki-glReGmst0fPbW2lywAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YMki-glReGmst0fPbW2lywAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/06/15/earning_figs.pdf
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YMki-glReGmst0fPbW2lywAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/06/15/response_to_civil_claim.pdf
[9] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_offbeat/legal&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YMki-glReGmst0fPbW2lywAAAEw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: 64 years old, $390K retirement package
Not a bad payoff, but he seemed to have been doing quite well in his job before he was shoved out the door.
I am curious as to why it might matter whether he was actively and continuously looking for work after being sacked. Should the compensation for wrongful termination be influenced by that?
Re: 64 years old, $390K retirement package
I am curious as to why it might matter whether he was actively and continuously looking for work after being sacked.
That was to feed into a Daily Mail story about the lazy unemployed, or the incompetent rich, or ... :-)
Re: 64 years old, $390K retirement package
Ahhh, the niceties of Canadian employment law.
If you are fired, the severance is not for years of service but to tide you over until you can find a roughly equivalent job. And you have to diligently search for same (that is, take notes of your Monster.com searches for "inside sales for an ISP".) The judge was fairly nice to the complainant giving him 21 months.
Nothing was said about Dell's initial offer of 8 weeks and subsequent counter of 18 to 22 months (para 24 of the linked response by Dell). An instance of dealing in bad faith, perhaps?
Dell also pointed out several subsequent decisions by customers to not purchase further or not purchase as much as previously. This is not under the control of the complainant and seems to be a distraction from the issues. Typical.
Their counsel is Dentons. Their invoice would be in the same range as the settlement; this is one of the top of the top amongst legal firms in Canada.
His birthday is probably September 2021, since that is the limit of the benefits offered (medical/dental): no obligation to extend past the 65th birthday.
And as for $390k, that is a pittance in the Vancouver market; you would need about $2M properly invested to support a $130k/year lifestyle. Nothing was said (nor need it be) about his current assets.
64 years old, $390K retirement package
Doesn't sound like he needs to find work to me.
Good for him and, as usual, shame on corporate behemoths who, apparently universally, cheat on the very people bringing in the contracts.