Can a 21.5-inch iMac beat the latest-and-greatest M1 model in performance? Kinda
- Reference: 1623060073
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/06/07/21_point_5_inch_imac_vs_m1/
- Source link:
But as YouTuber Luke Miani recently showed, if you value your time cheaply, it's possible to make an old 21.5 inch iMac competitive with the latest-and-greatest wafer-thin M1 goodness. If you are a bit selective with the benchmarks, that is.
[1]Youtube Video
[2]
The hero of this tale is Apple's previous entry-level iMac. Released in 2019, this came ( [3]specs here ) with a glacier-slow quad-core i3-8100 chip, paired with just 8GB of DDR4 RAM. It was not fast, but given its positioning as a tool for less-demanding home and education users, that wasn’t much of a problem. Miani said he acquired this for $750 — or two-thirds of the cost of a new M1 powered machine.
[4]
[5]
It was unambiguously outclassed by the M1 iMac, except for one thing: upgradability. Touting a socketed CPU, Miani was able to remove the sluggish i3-8100, replacing it with an octa-core Core i9-9900. This added $350 to the original purchase price.
Apple never actually offered the 21.5-inch iMac with an i9 chip. Those were saved for the larger 27-inch variant. According to EveryMac, a reliable compendium of Apple’s computing wares, the entry-level machine [6]topped out with an i7-8700 .
[7]
Rounding it off, Miani boosted the RAM from 8GB to 32GB, adding a further $150 to the cost. In total, the project cost $1,200 — just $50 short from the base M1 iMac with a seven-core GPU, 8GB RAM, and 256GB of internal storage.
Installing these upgrades proved to be a bit of a chore. As is the case with all iMacs released after 2006, the main avenue of ingress is through the display. Disassembly was further complicated by some awkwardly-located cables, which proved challenging to remove. This was necessary to replace the CPU, and, unlike previous models, switch out the RAM, which was contained within a metal cage affixed to the logic board.
So, was it worth it?
That largely depends on your perspective.
Are you particularly fussed about graphics performance? In that case, no. The stock M1 iMac utterly crushed the ageing AMD Radeon Pro 555X GPU found in 2019’s 21.5-inch variant. It simply wasn’t a fair fight.
[8]iFixit publishes teardown of M1 iMac, shows that making a determination of repairability is still hard
[9]'Big updates' to Mac design app Sketch add real-time collaboration – but you'll need to fork out for a subscription
[10]Hear that, Qualcomm? Analyst claims Apple's homegrown 5G modems to land in 2023 'at the earliest'
[11]But can it run Avid? The Reg hands shiny new M1 MacBook to video production pro, who beats it with Blender, Handbrake, and ... Hypercard?
[12]Docker Desktop for Apple Silicon is here, but probe a little deeper and you'll find Rosetta 2 staring back
[13]Mac OS X at 20: A rocky start, but it got the fundamentals right for a macOS future
When using the Geekbench 5 Compute benchmark, which tests how the internal GPU copes with running games, image processing, and video editing, the 21.5-inch model scored 15,789 against the M1’s nearly 20,000.
But it shone when running CPU-driven tasks. When pitched against the CPU-heavy Cinebench R15 test, the custom 21-inch iMac beat the M1 by almost a third. Rendering a project in open source 3D creation suite Blender took half the time (although this likely wasn’t a fair test, given the absence of a native Apple Silicon build.) The M1 won on multi-core performance, but only just, with 100 points separating the two.
For the vast majority of users, the M1 iMac should be enough. And, of course, there is no guarantee that you will end up spending less. Apple, for instance, sells the same machine used in this video [14]for a cool £1,059.99 refurbished . You can probably spend less on eBay, but that entails a level of risk that some might not be comfortable with.
[15]
Additionally, the long-term health of the Intel Mac is still very much uncertain. After it switched to x86, Apple only bothered to release one more system update for the PowerPC platform (namely: [16]Mac OS X Snow Leopard ). Developer support swiftly tapered off, particularly when it came to things like web browsers.
Still, if you already own one of these machines, Miani’s experiment shows it’s possible to squeeze extra performance beyond its original configuration. The 21.5-inch iMac also comes with a decent selection of ports, including USB-A and ethernet, making it slightly more practical.
This isn't Miani's first foray into iMac modification. As noted by this publication, he previously created one of the world's first custom M1 iMacs by [17]shoving the innards of a Mac Mini into a broken 2011 27-inch iMac . ®
Get our [18]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2QSE-zBP9E
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YL5Cn6WerhECyqCWTPOZEQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://support.apple.com/kb/SP789?locale=en_US
[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YL5Cn6WerhECyqCWTPOZEQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YL5Cn6WerhECyqCWTPOZEQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://everymac.com/systems/apple/imac/specs/imac-core-i7-3.2-21-inch-aluminum-retina-4k-early-2019-specs.html
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YL5Cn6WerhECyqCWTPOZEQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/25/m1_imac_ifixit_teardown/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/12/sketch_mac_updates/
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/05/10/apples_homegrown_5g_modems_to/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/22/m1_review/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/16/docker_m1/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/26/mac_at_20/
[14] https://www.apple.com/uk/shop/product/FRT32B/A/Refurbished-215-inch-iMac-36GHz-quad-core-Intel-Core-i3-with-Retina-4K-display
[15] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/personaltech&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YL5Cn6WerhECyqCWTPOZEQAAAFc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[16] https://www.theregister.com/2014/02/27/fanbois_face_xp_moment_as_snow_leopard_is_left_to_die/
[17] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/04/the_worlds_first_apple_silicon/
[18] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: But...
Yeah https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFUBalGW7Zo
Leopards...
It's even worse than you said: Leopard was the last PowerPC MacOS X. Snow Leopard was Intel-only. (The Intel switch happened during the Tiger period.) My first and last G4 Mac Mini got an upgrade to Leopard, and after that it was a Linux box. (Which I sold only a couple of years ago for actual money, which was shocking, I thought...)
That said, the Mac OS X release cycle then was every *two* years, not every year. So the first Intel iMac arrived in 2006 and the first Intel-only Mac OS X was 2009. The same gap equates to two or three more MacOS releases for Intel, which doesn't sound *quite* so bad...
Re: Leopards...
There was a 10.6.7 PPC beta or dev build that didn't see the light of day...
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/snow-leopard-on-unsupported-ppc-machines.2232031/
Re: Leopards...
If you have a use/grá for software that ran on the macs up to Mac OS 9, then the mac mini makes a super Mac OS 9 machine.
iMac FTW
At least you can install Windows (or Linux) and run some decent software
Re: Now that would be an interesting race
Linux on Parallels*, on an M1 Mac, vs Linux on bare metal, on an Intel based Mac. Windows under ARM is still work in progress so wouldn't be a fair comparison.
* Which runs up in seconds BTW.
Developer support
“Particularly when it came to things like web browsers…”
Actually there’s some guy who’s only just now announced the end of his Firefox-for-PPC project. It takes days to build a browser, even on a G5.
Probably has to do with RAM
My M1 MacBook Air with 16GB RAM smokes my i9-9700K with 64GB RAM, and significantly faster on single-core and nearly as fast on multi-core with my i9-9900K (those are 95W CPUs, not 6W like the i9-9900 non-K).
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/1826503?baseline=6428909
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/2117078?baseline=6428909
This has happened before
The PPC/Intel switch has been mentioned above.
Back in 1994 when Apple brought out the first PowerMacs, they were generally faster running (emulated) 68K code, but not always. Some software was faster on the 33MHz (Quadra 950 & 650) or 40MHzs (Quadra 840AV) 68040s than the same software was on the new PPCs. Now, to be sure, the same versions of code written in PPC code were much faster on PPCs than the 68K code on 68K macs.
Nowadays, these end of the line 68K macs are more valuable than the macs succeeded them and I expect that the end-of-the-line Intel-macs will become quite pricey (as secondhand macs go) in the recent future.
But...
But will it run Crysis?