Oracle cuts support for South African energy biz Eskom in long-running licensing dispute
- Reference: 1618832585
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/04/19/oracle_eskom_support/
- Source link:
Eskom spokesman Sikonathi Mantshantsha said Big Red had withdrawn support for multiple software systems after the electricity provider failed [1]to have the courts compel Oracle to continue while the dispute was settled. Eskom had also offered to pay what it thought it owed upfront until the figure was agreed in court.
[2]
Mantshantsha confirmed that Oracle had withdrawn some of its technical support services. "Eskom has contingency plans in place to reduce the risk of disruption resulting from the dispute with Oracle," he said.
The spokesman told media that the firm was conducting an "urgent procurement tender" to find third-party support for its Oracle software.
[3]
An Oracle spokeswoman said: "We are of the view that Eskom should pay the pending dues for the Oracle software that they use."
The electricity firm, which serves around 6.2 million direct customers, is known and unloved in SA for "load shedding" – planned load reduction by switching off power for hours at a time across South Africa – which [4]it describes as "a controlled option to respond to unplanned events to protect the electricity power system from a total blackout." This practice is so loathed that locals have nicknamed the firm's CEO, Jan Oberholzer, "the Prince of Darkness."
In a case dating back to 2019, Johannesburg High Court earlier this month dismissed an attempt by Eskom to compel Oracle to renew support services until April 2022.
According to the court application, [5]reported in the South African press , Oracle conducted a software licensing audit of the company in 2019 and concluded it was using more software than it was entitled to.
Oracle first claimed the user had underpaid by around R7.3bn (£370m, $500m), which was disputed by Eskom. The firm's CEO, André de Ruyter, reportedly wrote to Oracle describing its claim as a "sharp dispute" and noting that the software firm had subsequently reduced it to R600m (£31m, $41m).
Eventually, the amount claimed by Oracle was reduced to just under R400m (£20.17m, $28m). As far as Eskom is concerned, the amount due to Oracle is approximately R166m (£8.37m, $11.65m) in total.
In [6]a statement following the court ruling , the company said it offered to pay the R166m and proposed a verification and court process in order to end the dispute.
When Oracle rejected this approach, threatening to terminate its services to Eskom, "Eskom approached the high court to compel Oracle to continue providing the technical support services for the duration of the agreement until April 2022," the company said.
[7]
Since the court dismissed the application, Eskom has lodged leave for appeal. ®
Get our [8]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/08/eskom_set_to_appeal_court/
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YH2pG6ETqlc5GdV6gt4WwAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YH2pG6ETqlc5GdV6gt4WwAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://loadshedding.eskom.co.za/
[5] https://www.news24.com/fin24/companies/industrial/oracle-says-eskom-must-pay-up-as-utility-warns-of-catastrophic-consequences-of-loss-of-support-20210407
[6] https://www.eskom.co.za/news/Pages/2021Apr6.aspx
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/databases&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YH2pG6ETqlc5GdV6gt4WwAAAAJQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
From what I have read, the real victims will be Eskom customers that most likely don't have any alternatives.
Sounds like a shakedown to me....
"Important infrastructure you have there... by the way, you owe us $500m"
"No we don't "
"OK, make it $40m."
"No."
"Ok, $28m, final offer. Pay up or we cancel support"
The court case really should be "Oracle fraudulently try to bill $470m they accept they aren't owed."
"load shedding"
Is this what we'll be seeing in the UK soon as "Demand management" via smart meters ?
Incompetent vs Greedy
I would add it's also best to never deal with Eskom either.
Having had to deal with them over the last 15 years I can honestly say I've never come across such a symbolic org (and I've come across some doozies in my time)
There are some excellent tech guys at Eskom but they're understaffed, under-paid and under pressure :(
On top of that the layers and layers of horrific management who don't have a shred of knowledge on anything technical is something to behold.
I have absolutely no doubt they are under-licensed but I bet you it's not because the DBAs haven't pointed this out on numerous occasions.
What we have here is an incompetent company facing off against a greedy one :(
Why Oracle support?
This is a serious question.
Over the years I have created and delivered systems with databases in them. At on time it was Borland's Paradox and BDE and, latterly, MySQL/Mariadb. Those databases worked well and continue to do so without any paid support from me. Granted, there are (chargeable) issues sometimes and I have had to fix database problems but mostly they are created by humans or bad applications. The point is they work almost all of the time.
So why does Oracle have to have paid support? If it is unreliable then surely they should fix it? Cynically, have Oracle created something so complex that only Oracle engineers know how to fix it?
Reduced from $500M to $28M, or 5.6%
I hate Oracle with a passion, but Eskom, which has been too cheap to invest in their own grid, won't even pay the paltry sum. Does the CEO still make about R10m per year?
If you ever needed a good reason to avoid dealing with Oracle, this is it.