Nominet chooses civil war over compromise by rejecting ex-BBC Trust chairman
- Reference: 1618299128
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/04/13/nominet_civil_war/
- Source link:
“After much careful consideration, the board has decided not to invite Sir Michael to be acting chair,” said Nominet's acting chairman Rob Binns in a letter to Nominet’s members on Monday. Instead, he said, the remaining board members would push ahead with their own recruitment process for a new chair, CEO, and executive director.
[1]
The decision was met with fury from Nominet members who just last month [2]voted to oust Nominet’s CEO and chairman and remove three other board members because they were fed up with the organisation ignoring their views and pushing the not-for-profit registry into commercial markets.
That commercial push not only failed but saw .uk prices increase and charitable donations plummet. It also saw the board and senior management pay themselves huge salary increases at members’ expense. The PublicBenefit.uk campaign, which called for March's board vote, argued for a return to Nominet’s core operations and non-profit roots and narrowly won the vote 52.7 per cent to 47.3.
[3]
A significant part of the successful campaign was to install two seasoned executives – Sir Michael Lyons and internet infrastructure industry veteran Axel Pawlik – to Nominet’s board to ensure that reforms were carried out. But despite the result, the remnant Nominet board has refused to cede any control of the organisation.
[4]Nominet ignores advice, rejects serious change despite losing CEO, chair, half its board in membership vote
[5]Chairman, CEO of Nominet ousted as member rebellion drives .uk registry back to non-commercial roots
[6]Big problem: Nominet members won't know how many votes they're casting in decision to oust CEO, chair
[7]Pressure builds on Nominet as members demand to know leadership's contingency plans for when they’re fired
Organizer of the PublicBenefit.uk campaign, Simon Blackler, made no attempt to hide his irritation. “I don't mind telling you that I am incredibly angry at the lost opportunity, both for Nominet and its members,” he told supporters in an email sent out shortly after the board’s decision was made public. “The board have snubbed the membership in the most absolute terms… It demonstrates EXACTLY the type of hubris and insulated thinking this whole campaign was about changing.”
Clarity needed
At the same time, a letter from Sir Michael and Pawlik to Nominet’s remnant board was published in which they warned: “We do not believe that you are currently in a strong enough position to begin recruiting new board members or a new CEO. Both require clarity about future mission and stability.”
This decision by Nominet is the latest in a series that have made it plain the remaining board members intend to dig in rather than agree to reform, effectively daring members to hold a second extraordinary general meeting (EGM) and vote them out, too. It’s not clear how the result of a second EGM would go, especially given the narrow result of the March round, but in his response Blackler urged supporters to answer a simple two-question survey to see how much support there was to fire the rest of the board.
“We've been patient and given the remnant board the benefit of the doubt and opportunity to prove us all wrong. I'm afraid that grace hasn't been rewarded,” he said. “If there's enough support we'll regroup, find new candidates and finish what we started.”
Blackler’s concern that the remaining board members would continue to ignore calls for reform has unfortunately proven to be accurate. Despite the fact that the registry's members had voted all three staff members off the board to remove the extra votes that enabled Nominet’s management to ignore member wishes, the remnant board’s first action was to bring back two other staff members to the board to give them a voting majority.
[8]
They then chose the .uk registry operations boss Eleanor Bradley as interim CEO, despite the fact that she was one of those who had been voted off the board last month, and was one of the main recipients of excessive bonuses. In her own [9]post last week, Bradley outlined the changes she was planning to make in response to the EGM's outcome: it made no mention of any of the [10]five main reform goals sought by the PublicBenefit.uk campaign. ®
Get our [11]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YHVruqvMoz-ddu1AD2ffcgAAAMk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/22/nominet_board_sacked/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YHVruqvMoz-ddu1AD2ffcgAAAMk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] http://www.theregister.com/2021/04/01/nominet_future_plans/
[5] http://www.theregister.com/2021/03/22/nominet_board_sacked/
[6] http://www.theregister.com/2021/03/18/nominet_voting_fears/
[7] http://www.theregister.com/2021/03/02/nominet_board_vote/
[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YHVruqvMoz-ddu1AD2ffcgAAAMk&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[9] https://www.nominet.uk/delivering-change/
[10] https://publicbenefit.uk/
[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
It's Time
Time to push the red button on the gear lever.
https://i.makeagif.com/media/6-25-2015/QKoQXb.gif
Who's the fool?
I felt foolish for falling for the April Fools article for a minute. Evidently I shouldn't have.
Re: Who's the fool?
Wait, now I'm not even sure that article was fake. You linked to it in this article. This one is just about the decision being made formal?
It's a good thing that...
...The UK isn't in the middle of executing a Brexit plan that is doomed to fail while managing the fallout of a global pandemic. Other wise the government would have it's hands full and wouldn't intervene.
Oh wait...
Re: It's a good thing that...
If the whiff of a cushy* job reaches politico snouts I'm sure someone will find the time to intervene.
*smile, promise to listen to the members, make a few quick minor changes, keep the cash...
Re: It's a good thing that...
I hear David Cameron is looking for a new opportunity.
And if the members are troublesome, he has a friend who specialises in dismemberment.
Re: It's a good thing that...
Seriously, you want the government intervening in this?
Haven't they screwed up enough already?
When you're stuck in a hole...
stop digging!
>>>effectively daring members to hold a second extraordinary general meeting (EGM) and vote them out, too<<<
or to put it another way - sticking two fingers up at the implicit mandate from the result.
Another EGM may be proposing a major change to the board election process as well as removing the remaining bunch.
The arrogance of the entitled
The contempt and arrogance shown by the Nominet board is truly stunning.
Having fixed themselves a cushy job where they get paid unjustifiably large salaries for doing remarkably little, the board is doing everything they can to make sure that they keep them. Far from acting as if they are a member driven and owned organisation, the board seem to view Nominet's members as little more than cash cows to inflate their already over-inflated bank accounts.
The entire board should be sacked and the sooner the better.
Watch the big quiet members in the background
It is an outrage having to ask the people you have fired (by EGM) to stand aside. There is no other way of looking at it, they are being propped up by those with self interest. The bigger players (outside the UK) seem to be at odds with the wider membership, the smaller players inside the UK. Very unpleasant business.
What this needs
Is wider publicity, so that the British public is aware of the greed and diversion of funds into greedy pockets. However, I don't see government intervention as being desirable, particularly as my impression of recent governments is that they support exactly this kind of profiteering.
Apparently, the 1405 law requiring every town to have a pillory has never been repealed, I can think of a use for one.
Re: What this needs
Where I live we've still got our stocks and whipping post.
Looks like a good time to spruce them up and put them back into working order.
Was the legal validity of refusing to put the second motion to the EGM...
...ever resolved? If they'd fought that one a bit harder, maybe we'd not be here.
Board seems to be delaying the inevitable.
Please finish this soon. I'm getting sick of popcorn.