Apple's app transparency rules: Google's privacy labels for Chrome and Search on iOS highlighted by DuckDuckGo
- Reference: 1615900507
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/03/16/keep_scrolling_googles_privacy_labels/
- Source link:
Apple now [2]requires all App Store developers to label their apps to inform users of what data they collect. This has been mandatory since December 8th last year, but only when an app is updated.
[3]
Mysterious delays in Google's app updates soon ensued – though the company said in January that: "As Google's iOS apps are updated with new features or to fix bugs, you'll see updates to our app page listings that include the new App Privacy Details. These labels represent the maximum categories of data that could be collected — meaning if you use every available feature and service in the app."
[4]
"No details provided": some Google apps, like Maps, have yet to receive an update since Apple mandated privacy labels
[5]
But updates have gradually been rolling out, complete with privacy labels, though at the time of writing there were still important apps like Google Maps which stated "no details provided" (see above.)
Google has now updated both its Chrome web browser and its standalone Search app – and the list of labels is indeed a long one.
Dutch government: Did we say 10 'high data protection risks' in Google Workspace block adoption? Make that 8 [6]READ MORE
There are 19 categories of data that Google reported "may be collected and linked to your identity" in Chrome, and twice that number in Search, though the same type of data (such as Location) is listed multiple times such as under Analytics, Personalization, and Third-Party Advertising. Data listed includes location, search and browsing history, contact information, photos, video, audio, and "product interaction."
Note that the fact data is listed does not tell you exactly how it is used. For that, users should consult Google's massive [7]privacy policy .
Apple publishes privacy labels for its own apps [8]here – including its own browser Safari, which shows 13 categories of data collected, although only six of these are "linked to your identity."
In Google's case, all the data has been listed under the heading "Data linked to you." Firefox has come out better than either browser in this respect, with just four categories of data "linked to you" and three further ones "not linked to you."
[9]
Google’s privacy labels for its Search app on iOS: keep scrolling
DuckDuckGo also has an app for iOS and its privacy labels include just two categories of data, both under the heading "Data not linked to you." This, no doubt, explains why the privacy-focused browser vendor [10]tweeted yesterday that "after months of stalling, Google finally revealed how much personal data they collect in Chrome and the Google app. No wonder they wanted to hide it."
Will these labels have any impact on app usage? Google has a weaker position on iOS than it does on Android, as you would expect, since Apple points users towards its own Safari browser and Apple Maps, and even Chrome has to use the Safari browser engine.
[11]
Google Maps is a popular app though, and we have a hunch that since the privacy details appear below the fold when you find an app in the Store, it will not make much difference to usage. There is also the problem that understanding how personal data is used is something which even government-backed researchers [12]find challenging . ®
Get our [13]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/28/google_ios_att/
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/11/06/apple_privacy_advice/
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YFDkKlO6VWBJRXGr4PzVGAAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/03/16/mapsnodata.jpg
[5] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YFDkKlO6VWBJRXGr4PzVGAAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/05/dutch_government_identifies_10_high/
[7] https://policies.google.com/privacy?hl=en
[8] https://www.apple.com/privacy/labels/
[9] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/03/16/searchprivacy.jpg
[10] https://twitter.com/DuckDuckGo/status/1371509053613084679
[11] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_security/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YFDkKlO6VWBJRXGr4PzVGAAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/05/dutch_government_identifies_10_high/
[13] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: And that would be one reason why
I did the same. Don't miss them. Haven't looked back. Ditto for Facebook.
Using Google and Privacy
in the same sentence has got to be the ultimate example of an oxymoron.
Oops, am I allowed to use the word oxymoron anymore? This may upset the non-oxygen breathers among us. Sorry.
In other news the sea is salty!
Google's massive privacy policy.
Last Time I checked, the latest version ("Effective 30 September 2020") was over 8,000 words long and presented in a way that prevents data subjects identifying which rights they can exercise ( [1]like most other "privacy policies" out there ).
However the scariest "privacy policy" I've encountered was 36,000 words long, so there's plenty of scope for further work.
[1] http://businessinforisk.co.uk/library/Awful_not_Lawful-final-BiR.pdf
I stopped using google and switched to duckduckgo 11 years ago. IT was fin search engine and now duckduckgo is wonderful search engine. Meanwhile, google search got worse and worse.
Now on to presearch.org
Beyond duckduckgo... Check out presearch.org. Private & decentralized. Block chain based.
Google is the least of Apple's worries
To quote a /. article
"Some of China's biggest technology companies, including ByteDance and Tencent are testing a tool to bypass Apple's new privacy rules."
Good luck kicking them out of the App Store, Tim Apple.
Re: Google is the least of Apple's worries
Why would they have trouble kicking them out? Doesn't the contract say that attempting to violate the rules is a violation?
Or do you mean it will be hard for them to find apps that use the bypass tool?
Re: Google is the least of Apple's worries
Try reading the article in future, then you won't sound like such a clueless moron.
Re: Google is the least of Apple's worries
"To quote a /. article"
Well, there's your first problem. There are lies, damn lies, and Slashdot.
The privacy labels are for the updated Chrome
who knows what they slurped before ? Have Google spent between 8 Dec & now removing some of the more egregious stuff that they were taking ?
Does Apple/anyone verify what Google says that it takes ?
And that would be one reason why
I have deleted everything Google from all my systems, Mac, iOS, Windows, Linux. Actually I did that years ago. And by ‘everything Google’ I mean to include Gmail, Maps, Waze, Google Earth…