We can't avoid it any longer. Here's a story about the NFT mania... aka someone bought a JPEG for $69m in Ether
- Reference: 1615528927
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/03/12/beeple_nft_sold/
- Source link:
That's perhaps a lot to unpack. An NFT is a unique string of numbers and characters that act as a digital certificate proving ownership of a particular item. The token is published on a blockchain to record this ownership, and the token can be later transferred to another person. The chain of ownership is indelibly reflected in the token's blockchain. The value lies in how much you can sell the token for to the next person.
[2]
You can make an NFT for pretty much anything – and ideally something someone wants to pay for. Digital artwork, music, the written word, whatever can be represented as a token. In the case of the $69m artwork: it's a giant JPEG. It's a big picture. Like all NFT assets, it exists outside the blockchain. You can see a preview of it [3]here . Someone bought, presumably, the full thing for tens of millions of dollars, and got a token in a blockchain to prove it.
In general, the creator of such NFT works can retain the copyright if they wish. The asset might even already be public, or sold separately like, say, on iTunes. Again, NFTs are a hyped up, cryptographic way of proving you own an official copy of something. Using an [4]append-only log of receipts that consumes a [5]non-trivial amount of energy.
[6]
The craze has been bubbling along as celebrities, musicians, and tech moguls made NFTs out of stuff like individual [7]public tweets and [8]albums . It hit another level, though, with the sale of a JPEG file titled "Everydays: The First 5000 Days," deemed to be worth, we say again, $69m (£49.3m) in the cryptocurrency Ether when it was auctioned off this week.
Want to roll like one of the biggest minds in physics? Prof Stephen Hawking's wheelchair is up for auction [9]READ MORE
“The artist has stitched together recurring themes and color schemes to create an aesthetic whole,” Christie’s [10]stated . “Organized in loose chronological order, zooming in on individual pieces reveals abstract, fantastical, grotesque, and absurd pictures, alongside current events and deeply personal moments. Society’s obsession with and fear of technology; the desire for and resentment of wealth; and America’s recent political turbulence appear frequently throughout the work.”
Each rectangle is a drawing by artist Mike Winkelmann, aka Beeple: he's said to have produced a sketch pretty much every day since 2007, and so the assembled collage of these pictures sold off this week represents years of work. [11]Zoom in and you’ll find pretty dark stuff, such a picture of Michael Jackson’s face split in half next to Kim Jong Un’s face also split in half. There's also cartoon characters, futuristic-looking emblems, monsters, glowing orbs... what can we say? Art is art.
[12]
Totally worth it ... the $69m picture. Source: Christie's
Is Winkelmann trying to make an artistic statement about technology in general, just cashing in on the weird world of crypto, or making a visual version of the aristocrats joke?
“Yeah I have no f*****g clue what I'm doing here, man,” he [13]said quite frankly on his personal site.
"I've been down the rabbit hole of cryptoart for all of about 2 months (though to be fair in this space that is like 6 f*****g years) so I'm very much just making this s**t up as i go!!!! I will say this though, I honestly don't think I've ever felt this inspired or excited to be creating.
"Everyone in this space is god damn smart as f**k and so passionate that it just has this amazing energy. It feels like we're at the start of something really special and we all get to be a part of making the rules. I am truly humbled and honored to be a small part of that!!"
[14]
When the auction closed, Winkelmann [15]tweeted : “Holy f***.” Holy f***, indeed. Winkelmann and Christie’s weren’t immediately available for further comment. ®
Get our [16]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.christies.com/features/Monumental-collage-by-Beeple-is-first-purely-digital-artwork-NFT-to-come-to-auction-11510-7.aspx?sc_lang=en&lid=1
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YEtJyvLQKViUAfLXSY1oTwAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[3] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EwNlE2eXMAMgrPz?format=png
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2019/05/07/blockchain_gartner_assessment/
[5] https://memoakten.medium.com/the-unreasonable-ecological-cost-of-cryptoart-2221d3eb2053
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YEtJyvLQKViUAfLXSY1oTwAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://twitter.com/jack/status/1367990471759306752?s=20
[8] https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/kings-of-leon-when-you-see-yourself-album-nft-crypto-1135192/
[9] https://www.theregister.com/2018/10/24/stephen_hawking_auction/
[10] https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/beeple-first-5000-days/beeple-b-1981-1/112924
[11] https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/beeple-first-5000-days/beeple-b-1981-1/112924
[12] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/03/11/beeple.jpg
[13] https://www.beeple-collect.com/faq
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YEtJyvLQKViUAfLXSY1oTwAAAII&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://twitter.com/beeple/status/1370037462085595137
[16] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: It just goes to show ...
Yeah... but I wouldn't mind.
Re: It just goes to show ...
Im more pissed off I didnt thi k of some crackpot scheme like this to make millions.
Re: It just goes to show ...
I have some Tulips and some shares in Pacific Exploration, if you like.
Boss it...
"“Yeah I have no f*****g clue what I'm doing here man. I've been down the rabbit hole of [FILL IN YOUR FAVOURITE SUBJECT] for all of about 2 months (though to be fair in this space that is like 6 f*****g years) so I'm very much just making this s**t up as i go!!!!"
Be honest, when reading this, who did NOT think of their own boss...
Re: Boss it...
That doesn't apply to my current bosses, but I've worked for dozens over the years, where that was true.
It makes
the buyers of Pet Rocks look like geniuses
Someone's having a laugh...
And it's probably Christies on the way to the bank
How long before the copyright, trademark or other litigation? There's a least one corporate logo in there (Burger King) and the odds seem good that at least a few of those images might raise an eyebrow to someone else (copyright or use of a photograph without a model release). Lawyers love a juicy target with a known volume of cash they can drain ;)
This reminds me somewhat of the milliondollarpixel website back in the day
Proof that when it comes to tech and art, sometimes it does matter to be first rather than best.
Missing the Boat again?
Is this then next BC type of value holder? I worked with a 12 yr old student back in 2013 who was mining back then, should have took his advice.
Levels of understanding
On the BBC news this morning, the "artist" explained that the online "work of art" would last in perpetuity because the token is "in the blockchain" (I wonder which blockchain), even if the "art" were deleted. So you've essentially bought a hash for $69M.
Seems a pity that folks with so much to waste couldn't find something [a] more useful and [b] more interesting than a collage of stuff already dumped to Instagram to lose it on.
NFTs are a hyped up, cryptographic way of proving you own an official copy of something separating fools from their money.
FTFY
What is this
So we have a computer file, NOT signed and a token that says you own this computer file.
So what is the point. The file is NOT unique, there could be a billion copies all identical, so what makes this unique or valuable?
To me it is just like crypto currencies, "funny money" with no actual value.
Well, good for him
He just took everything he'd ever worked on and made a giant JPG out of it.
Which he sold for almost $70 million, the bastard.
I wonder how long it'll take him to spend all that money ?
> “Holy f***.” Holy f***,
No he didn't, he tweeted "Holy Fuck" - just once and no asterisks.
What's with the sudden censoring of quotes? I can't remember El Reg being shy about using the full range of vocabulary in the past?
I guess it was acceptable under the .uk domain.
Dumber than a rock?
AFAICT, someone paid $69M to get a digital signature of a JPG added to a blockchain, indicating that they own the JPG. And it isn't even clear whether the new owner owns the copyright to the image, or is just the registered owner of a file that can be still be copied and distributed to others. Or even trivially modified by its creator and sold again.
Wow.
Blockchain 0, Mona Lisa 1?
Would I buy an NFT and a JPG for $XYZ million? No.
Would I buy a 400 yr old piece of canvas with some coloured brushstrokes for $XYZ million? No.
Honestly, I can't see any great difference between the two "items"... a thing is worth what somebody is prepared to pay for it.
Mencken was right
"No one ... has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses..."
The injury added to the insult is the massive waste of energy expended on stupid proof-of-work tokens. At least fiat currency can be worth more than the cost to produce it.
It just goes to show ...
... that people with more money than brains have more money than brains.
Whodathunkit.