News: 1615300988

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

SpaceX wants to slap Starlink internet terminals on planes, trucks, and boats – but Tesla owners need not apply

(2021/03/09)


Elon Musk's satellite internet constellation biz, Starlink, wants to sell its end-user station devices and services for use in vehicles, judging by a [1]filing with the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The filing, submitted by SpaceX, began by noting the authorisation the company has received to launch over 4,400 non-geostationary orbit satellites. More than 1,100 have been launched so far "to bring high-speed, reliable, and affordable broadband service to consumers in the United States and around the world, including areas underserved or currently unserved by existing networks."

[2]

Thus far, the company (or rather its sister company, SpaceX Services) was granted a licence for the operation of up to one million end-user stations. Although they are usually placed in fixed locations, the company now wants to be licensed to mount the devices on vehicles (Vehicle-Mounted Earth Stations or "VMESs"), vessels (Earth Stations on Vessels or "ESVs") and aircraft (Earth Stations Aboard Aircraft or "ESAAs".)

SpaceX small print on Starlink insists no Earth government has authority or sovereignty over Martian activities [3]READ MORE

[4]

The hardware will, according to the filing, be "electrically identical to its previously authorized consumer user terminals" but feature mountings more suited to the targeted vehicle than the outside of a remote barn in a bit of the US neglected by internet providers.

It also promised the unhelpfully monikered E-SIMs (not embedded SIMs, as Reg readers might know them, but Earth Stations in Motion) would be put into customers' kit by "qualified installers who have an understanding of the antenna's radiation environment and the measures best suited to maximize protection of the general public and persons operating the vehicle and equipment."

"No longer are users willing to forego connectivity while on the move," intoned SpaceX, insisting in its filing the granting of its application would most definitely be in the public interest. The eye-popping cost to passengers of internet access from aircraft as well as a keenness for connectivity for freight is also likely a factor.

In an Attachment Narrative, SpaceX explained that the broader licensing would "promote competition in the market for in-motion broadband services, to the benefit of drivers, ship operators, and air travelers in the United States and abroad."

However, one set of customers unlikely to benefit from the company's hoped-for internet-on-the-move will be Tesla drivers. Sticking a terminal on top of one of Elon Musk's [5]electric jalopies would probably spoil the sleek lines of the vehicle. The company's boss let fans of the vehicles down gently:

Not connecting Tesla cars to Starlink, as our terminal is much too big. This is for aircraft, ships, large trucks & RVs. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) [6]March 8, 2021

[7]

The application was filed as SpaceX continues its impressive launch cadence. The next batch of 60 Starlink satellites are due to go up tomorrow morning at 02:58 UTC atop a booster previously used to send NASA astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley to the International Space Station. The mission is scheduled for less than a week after the previous Starlink launch. ®

Get our [8]Tech Resources



[1] https://fcc.report/IBFS/SES-LIC-INTR2021-00934

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YEeprOmeQdF3iOBC1Iwo@wAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/23/starlink_moon/

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YEeprOmeQdF3iOBC1Iwo@wAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://electricmilkfloats.co.uk/

[6] https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1369051431903268865?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_onprem/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YEeprOmeQdF3iOBC1Iwo@wAAABY&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

JetSetJim

> Sticking a terminal on top of one of Elon Musk's electric jalopies would probably spoil the sleek lines of the vehicle

Why stick the terminal on top? Why not just the antenna with the "terminal" squirreled away in the boot, or built into some other cubby hole?

BenM 29

>>Why not just the antenna with the "terminal" squirreled away in the boot, or built into some other cubby hole?

the article says "...electrically identical to its previously authorized consumer user terminals..." which your proposed modification would not be.

Not saying that they couldn't design a Starlink receiver for the Tesla, just that it isn't anywhere near as simple as just yanking the antenna off and separating it from the rest of it. IMHO, the number of users would probably be fairly small (I guess most Tesla drivers don't drive in the boondocks) making it hard to justify.

tip pc

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1369051431903268865

Musk tweeted that he wasn't going to stick an antennae on tesla's, the tweet is in the article (May have been added after the above replies"

Boothy

The current user 'terminal' (their name) is a phased array dish about 2 foot across.

There's a few pics on [1]arstechnica

Granted they could probably shrink the size down somewhat, perhaps integrate the phased array into the roof panels, but that's going to take a bit of a redesign to the cars.

[1] https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2020/11/spacex-starlink-beta-tester-takes-user-terminal-into-forest-gets-120mbps/

Probably Not

HammerOn1024

"Granted they could probably shrink the size down somewhat..."

Probably not. Phased array antennas are very size sensitive for a number of reasons like the minimum aperture necessary to reconstruct the waveform, emitter power levels, etc. As with any antenna there are trade offs; the primary advantage is that there is no mechanical system needed to steer the beam. The primary disadvantage is the amount of power needed to transmit is quite a bit higher since any given element is effectively an omni directional antenna; one only gains an advantage during constructive interference between the emitters.

Also, sticking a 2 ft. antenna on the top of a car, hood or trunk lid would involve structural redesign of the vehicle as antenna and their associated radome make very poor load bearing devices.

"Retrofits ain't easy."

Re: Probably Not

Yet Another Anonymous coward

> sticking a 2 ft. antenna on the top of a .. trunk lid would involve structural redesign of the vehicle

My neighbourhood 17 year olds with fake-WRX Subarus disagree with

Intelsat

Sparkus

needs to get their antiquated act together......

Re: Intelsat

Billy Whiz

Why? if they are "electrically identical to its previously authorized consumer user terminals" as stated in the article then it doesn't bode well for the quality of their products. You can't just put a consumer grade gizmo in a new box, strap it to a plane and expect it to survive the first take-off. Or a truck for that matter, the operating environment is way too strenuous.

Although this sort of thing would go a long way to explain Tesla's terrible reliabilty stats.

1 million users?

Pen-y-gors

So Starlink, 4000 satellites messing up the sky, can only provide connectivity to 1 million users?

I was expecting hundreds of millions

Re: 1 million users?

Anonymous Coward

Only licensed for.

At the moment.

It's still a trial.

Re: 1 million users?

Yet Another Anonymous coward

Probably a limit on the number of digits in the field on the license form

Serenity through viciousness.