FCC announces winners in $81bn 5G spectrum auction. Congrats to Verizon, which must cough up $45.4bn
- Reference: 1614262349
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/02/25/fcc_auctions_off_81_billion/
- Source link:
The comms body auctioned off 280Mhz of C-band spectrum, originally used by communications satellites, split into fourteen 20Mhz blocks in the 3.7Ghz to 4.2Ghz range.
[1]
This territory is highly coveted by telecoms providers transitioning to 5G, as it provides a high level of coverage for each cell site, albeit at the expense of speed. This is crucial if you want to extend coverage to rural areas, or sprawling suburban towns where not-in-my-backyard types may grumble at the sight of a cell tower on every street corner. Compare that to mmWave, which operates in the high gigahertz spectrum, and offers faster speeds but minuscule coverage.
Satellite comms providers who previously used parts of the band were last year promised "incentives" to vacate the spectrum
[2]PDF
, with "reasonable relocation costs" amounting to up to $9.7bn to be paid by the licensees. According to the FCC's final C-band order, Intelsat will receive about $4.87bn; SES about $3.97bn; Eutelsat about $507m; Telesat $344m; and Star One $15m.[3]
The FCC [4]allowed 57 providers [PDF] to bid for the spectrum, including all of the large carriers, as well as the smaller rural telecoms providers (like the quaintly named Mark Twain Rural Telephone Company). As expected, it was the big providers that took home the bacon (or, in this case, spectrum).
Going, going, gone... until March: UK comms regulator delays 5G spectrum auction over pandemic logistics [5]READ MORE
Verizon Wireless (referred to as [6]Cellco Partnership in the FCC documents [PDF] ) easily spent the most, with a total bid of $45.4bn for 3,511 licences. AT&T and T-Mobile also spent generously, forking out $23.4bn and $9.3bn respectively, in return receiving 1,621 and 142 licences. US Cellular, a relatively small-fry player, paid "just" $1.2bn for 254 licences.
Why are the carriers prepared to spend such eye-watering amounts? Basically, if they want to be anywhere in the US 5G landscape, they had to cough up. "Carriers were apparently willing to spend whatever it took to acquire spectrum in this auction because the alternative was worse — becoming an also-ran in the race to 5G," Sasha Javid, a former chief data officer at the FCC, told the [7]FT a few weeks back.
The previous record amount netted for the sale of US airwaves – $45bn – was [8]set six years ago .
Per the terms of the auction, bidding parties must pay 20 per cent upfront, with the remainder sent before the end of March. Verizon, for example, will have to wire the FCC $36.3bn by March 24 of this year – a figure greater than its consolidated operating revenues (at $34.7bn) for the entirety of its [9]final reported quarter for 2020 .
Dems to ISPs: You're not gonna hike broadband prices, slap restrictions on folks in a pandemic, are you? [10]READ MORE
"It is essential to America’s economic recovery that we deliver on the promise of next generation wireless services for everyone, everywhere," said FCC acting chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel in a statement. [11]Rosenworcel replaced former boss [12]Ajit Pai , who left at the end of January, when President Biden was inaugurated.
"This auction reflects a shift in our nation’s approach to 5G toward mid-band spectrum that can support fast, reliable, and ubiquitous service that is competitive with our global peers. Now we have to work fast to put this spectrum to use in service of the American people."
Closer to home, the [13]UK is having its own spectrum auction across the 700MHz (long range, but low speeds) and 3.6Ghz to 3.8Ghz bands. This bandwidth – which was partially yanked from digital TV services and wireless microphones – is expected to go under the hammer next month with a cumulative reserve price of £1.084bn, following several COVID-related delays. ®
[14]
*Equivalent to the combined 2019 GDP of Croatia and Bosnia.
Get our [15]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_datacentre/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YDfXrOdwaW1ssnUiHcfDFAAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-362358A1.pdf
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_datacentre/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YDfXrOdwaW1ssnUiHcfDFAAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-1333A2.pdf
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/25/ofcom_delays_5g_spectrum_auction/
[6] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-370267A1.pdf
[7] https://www.ft.com/content/ae9f3b6f-8d7b-4b69-83cb-97f60965ef8e
[8] https://www.theregister.com/2015/01/29/us_spectrum_sale/
[9] https://www.verizon.com/about/news/verizon-ends-2020-strong-earnings-and-cash-flow-and-increased-wireless-service-revenue-growth
[10] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/12/us_broadband_pandemic/
[11] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/21/rosenworcel_fcc/
[12] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/20/pai_us_telecoms/
[13] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/25/ofcom_delays_5g_spectrum_auction/
[14] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_datacentre/networks&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YDfXrOdwaW1ssnUiHcfDFAAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[15] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
is there no time limit on the license or is it forever?
Logically the buyers of this bandwidth are going to have to recover these costs. So how is this not just another tax on consumers in the end?
So-called "5G" won't actually offer many users much more than 4G does; it's a hype bubble of historic (remember the 3G auctions of 2000 or so?) proportions. The licenses will be used in core cities where their 10 or so other bands are crowded, but not much beyond. The bankers must be treating them as a form of currency, a financial asset backed in the hope that somebody else values them so much too. Otherwise Verizon's debt will be crippling.
Unlicensed wireless microphones have had a terrible time on both sides of the pond it seems. In the US, that started in 2010 with the grace period ending last year and now the same is set to happen in the UK it seems.
It gets more complicated with unlicensed units that operate on the same frequencies as UHF DTV channels. Now you need to plan ahead for the geography where your wireless units will be used and check if your specific model has any available non-overlapping UHF "local" DTV channels (where local is defined as <60 miles from the DTV transmitter) and if so, this dictates how many, if any, different channels can you use at the same time.
I know that Shure recently petitioned FCC to reopen a 6Mhz UHF channel in each market due to all the frequency shuffling over the past decade, as FCC's proposed alternatives weren't really good alternatives.
It is an utter shit show. Of course, the pandemic has all but shut down concerts and most production across the US, so I guess it's a bit of a paused shit show.
I'm not in government so this might seem naive, but given that spectrum is finite and companies aren't...wouldn't it make more sense for the government to RENT (or at least lease) the spectrum to anybody that wants to use it?