Whistleblowers: Inmates due for release are kept locked up behind bars thanks to inflexible prison software
- Reference: 1614029392
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/02/22/arizona_prison_software/
- Source link:
According to public radio station KJZZ, unidentified whistleblowers within the Arizona Department of Corrections revealed the software problem, which is said to have been known by department IT leaders since 2019.
[1]
The software, ACIS (Arizona Correctional Information System), implemented in 2019 at a cost of $24m by IT biz Business & Decision, North America, is said to contain a module for calculating the release dates of inmates.
The module's code, however, hasn't been able to adapt to Arizona Senate Bill 1310, a state law signed in June 2019 to allow non-violent inmates in Arizona to earn credits toward early release as a reward for participating in state-run education and rehabilitation programs.
[2]
Traffic lights worldwide set to change after Swedish engineer saw red over getting a ticket [3]READ MORE
The software can neither recalculate sentences to account for early release credits nor help identify inmates who qualify for such programs, thereby keeping people in prison who shouldn't be there and frustrating efforts to reduce the state's prison population.
[4]KJZZ's report , by Jimmy Jenkins, indicates that Department of Corrections leaders have been aware of the problem since the software debuted and that department employees, after internal warnings were ignored, sent a report on the software's shortcomings to department leadership in October 22, 2020.
The internal communique requests specific changes in the software to handle the new release formula and to adjust the application's interface. Under prior law, the state allows an earned release credit of one day for every six days served; under SB1310, the formula for eligible inmates changes to three days for every seven days served.
The Register asked Business & Decision, North America, for comment. In an email, a company spokesperson disputed that use of the term "bug" to describe ACIS' lack of adaptability.
"It is not uncommon for new legislation to dictate changes to software systems," the company spokesperson said. "This translates to a change request and not a bug in the system."
We also asked the Arizona Department of Corrections for comment but we've not heard back. In addition, we emailed department CIO Holly Greene but did not receive a response.
The Arizona Department of Corrections has not identified how many people currently in prison should not be there under the SB1310 rules. KJZZ reports that the department has been attempting to identify inmates eligible for sentence-mitigating programs by hand and has thus far found 733 who could enroll.
The ACIS software program was poorly scoped, and the project is millions of dollars over budget, leading to endless contract amendments with the vendor to pay for updates and maintenance [5]pic.twitter.com/YPoRQs279e — Jimmy Jenkins (@JimmyJenkins) [6]February 22, 2021
The KJZZ report suggests fixing the calculation problem would take 2,000 hours of developer time, which appears to be billed at a rate of about $1,137 per hour, based on the screenshot of a Department of Corrections contract amendment included with the report. It's claimed that more than 14,000 bugs have been identified in ACIS since the software was implemented.
We asked Business & Decision, North America, about these alleged bugs but didn't get an immediate answer.
Jenkins says that department leaders directed employees to keep silent about the problems with ACIS because the state had already committed too much money to back out.
[7]
The Register reached a spokesperson for the Arizona Department of Corrections by phone who said the department was in the process of drafting a statement to address inaccuracies in the KJZZ report but offered no hint as to what those might be or when the statement would be issued. ®
Get our [8]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YDQ3kQeHQnmFgcsoIwfgNQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YDQ3kQeHQnmFgcsoIwfgNQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2019/10/21/traffic_lights_changed/
[4] https://kjzz.org/content/1660988/whistleblowers-software-bug-keeping-hundreds-inmates-arizona-prisons-beyond-release
[5] https://t.co/YPoRQs279e
[6] https://twitter.com/JimmyJenkins/status/1363849394110361602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_software/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YDQ3kQeHQnmFgcsoIwfgNQAAAMI&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[8] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
And 2,000 hours at that.
I'll gladly write buggy software for half that rate
All I'll want is a 20,000 hour minimum.
Re: ...rate of about $1,137 per hour
I should rethink my retirement. I need a new snow blower.
That's $18.95 a minute. I thought I was doing great getting $1.50 a minute. But that wasn't working full time.
inflexible prison software
That's a REALLY bad case of vendor lock-in.
Re: inflexible prison software
I can just about guarantee that the people awarded the contract have some close ties to the vendor.
Or am I stating the obvious?
Re: inflexible prison software
@Howard Sway, bloody brilliant just wish I could up vote you more.
They're having a laugh
If that report is anywhere near accurate, as well as the ridiculously high cost per hour of bug fixing, 2,000 hours to tweak a calculation?
They evidently view Arizona's State Government as a bottomless pit of money who'll willingly throw millions of dollars at them - possibly even billions if they're charging over a thousand dollars per hour and over a thousand hours of development time to fix each of tens of thousands of "unresolved issues" and "feature requests"...
Which came first?
Which came first the software going live or the law SB1310 being passed as they both happened in 2019?
Even if it went live earlier (not earlier then six months) than SB1310, they must have know it was on the books to be debated. Should they not have delayed the software going live until it could handle changes to the release credit formula?
...rate of about $1,137 per hour
I am most definitely in the wrong job.