News: 1613114890

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Machine-learning model creates creepiest Doctor Who images yet – by scanning the brain of a super fan

(2021/02/12)


AI researchers have attempted to reconstruct scenes from Doctor Who by using machine-learning algorithms to convert brain scans into images.

The wacky experiment is described in a [1]paper released via bioRxiv. A bloke laid inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) machine, with his head clamped in place, and was asked to watch 30 episodes of the BBC's smash-hit family sci-fi show while the equipment scanned his brain. These scans were then passed to a neural network.

[2]

This machine-learning model, dubbed Brain2pix, predicted the scene from Doctor Who that was watched by the human guinea pig using those scans of his brain activity alone. The AI system can't freely read one's thoughts nor determine any old picture in your head. It's designed and trained to recreate the moment in Doctor Who that was being watched just from the observed brain activity.

Each fMRI brain scan was turned into an array of numbers, or a tensor, using receptive field mapping. This technique "is a way to map very specific brain locations onto the visual space as it tells us which point in the brain is responsible for what pixel that you see in your visual space,” Lynn Le, first author of the study and a PhD student at the Radboud University Nijmegen in The Netherlands, told The Register .

[3]

The Brain2pix model took those tensors as input, and outputted a visual image, effectively translating activity in the brain into pixels of what was probably being watched. Here’s an example of what that looks like in practice:

[4]

An assistant to remember. Source: Brain2pix

As you can see, the reconstructions are a bit rum. Karen Gillan – who played the role of Amy Pond, Doctor Who’s fictional sidekick in series five to seven – looks more like a terrifying monster or alien from the show. Here are examples of an Ood alien.

[5]

Even more terrifying. Click to enlarge. Source: Brain2pix

Brain2pix was trained using data that pairs a specific Doctor Who clip with its corresponding fMRI scan. The model contains a generative adversarial network that recreates the scene and these attempts are passed onto a discriminator network that has to guess whether the machine-learning-made image looks like a real clip from the training data.

If the reconstructed image isn’t quite good enough, the discriminator rejects it and the generator has to try again. Over time, the generator improves and manages to trick the discriminator into believing its images are real.

Experiments that involve converting brain signals into [6]speech or images are often limited in scope. There is significant overlap between the training and testing data. Something like Brain2pix, for example, cannot recreate an image from a brain scan it hasn’t seen before.

An 'AI' that can diagnose schizophrenia from a brain scan – here's how it works (or doesn't) [7]READ MORE

That means if a participant was asked to watch a brand new episode of Doctor Who and the fMRI images were given to the model, it would not be able to accurately recreate what the participant had seen. The machine-generated images are also heavily dependent on an individual’s brain scans, too: the software's training involved learning a specific person's activity in response to watching the TV show.

It’s difficult to get Brain2pix to transfer what it learned about one participant to another. Even if two people watched the same Doctor Who clip, the neural network would probably be unable to reconstruct the images from someone else's brain scans if it wasn’t explicitly trained on them.

Still, the researchers believe their work may prove useful in the future. “First, it allows us to investigate how brains represent the environment, which is a key question in the field of sensory neuroscience,” Le told us.

“Second, it demonstrates a promising approach for several clinical applications. An obvious example is a brain-computer interface which would allow us to communicate with locked-in patients by accessing their brain states.”

[8]

The dream is that eventually, some day, neuroprosthetics will get good enough to help restore vision for the blind. “Here the goal is to create percepts of vision in blind patients by bypassing their eyes and directly stimulating their brains. Approaches like Brain2pix can in principle be used to determine what kind of percepts might be evoked as a result of such direct neuronal stimulation,” she added. ®

Get our [9]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.02.429430v1

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_emergent_tech/artificial_intelligence&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YCZfzlsWDVPkbtffrqoJegAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_emergent_tech/artificial_intelligence&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YCZfzlsWDVPkbtffrqoJegAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/02/11/drwho.jpg

[5] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/02/11/ood.jpg

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2019/01/30/ai_brain_reader/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2017/07/26/ibm_and_uni_alberta_tackle_schizophrenia/

[8] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_emergent_tech/artificial_intelligence&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YCZfzlsWDVPkbtffrqoJegAAANQ&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[9] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

osakajin

As usual a Nobel goal that will undoubtedly be subverted and used for repression

KittenHuffer

Other research into replacing the sound sources in church steeples is hoped to lead to a noble no bell nobel!

osakajin

Bloody autocorrect

Very unlikely

Mike 137

This is very unlikely to be usable for repression and it's a pretty impressive piece of work.

" There is significant overlap between the training and testing data. Something like Brain2pix, for example, cannot recreate an image from a brain scan it hasn’t seen before. That means if a participant was asked to watch a brand new episode of Doctor Who and the fMRI images were given to the model, it would not be able to accurately recreate what the participant had seen. The machine-generated images are also heavily dependent on an individual’s brain scans, too: the software's training involved learning a specific person's activity in response to watching the TV show." "

So it can only reproduce (person-specifically) what is currently being presented to the visual field. Consequently it can lead to understanding of the way visual images are processed, but it's not a tool (and never could be a tool) for investigating what's stored by the brain already. Nor is there any suggestion (or likelihood) of it being usable to modify either the interpretation of what's being seen or what's already stored (it only works one way).

Re: Very unlikely

RobLang

The researcher is bound by process to list the limits of the research as presented, not the limits of the technology as a whole.

As the variety, veracity, value and volume of training data increases, there is no reason why this technique could be used for broader tasks across subjects.

re. This is very unlikely to be usable for repression

Anonymous Coward

ANYTHING is usable for repression! Remember that great (noble) idea of Wholly Inquisition?! It was design to inquire, in whole, the unbelievers, round-earthers, and all such infideli(s), in order to make them confess, repent (etc, etc.) and give them entry through the heaven's gates and such, while in reality, all it came down to was one pathetic "Comfy Chair"! I mean, WTF?!

Not a Dalek?

Wellyboot

Does anyone else think that using Karen Gillan as the stimulus might invoke mental activity slightly different from the image recognition they're after.

Someone with access to an MRI machine has misunderstood machine learning again...

Anonymous Coward

A very similar trial was commented on by Rob Newman in his radio 4 series "Neuropolis" (For those of you going "Who?" Rob Newman is one of the guys from the Mary Whitehouse Experience... Admittedly, that won't help the younger readers here though.) I *think* it's still available to listen to, but I'm afraid I can't remember the episode number, so you'll have to listen to all 4....

The images aren't being reconstructed from brain imagery, it's just a machine learning platform using pattern matching. It isn't going to be able to predict what is being watched without having been trained on the exact combination of Doctor Who episode and a particular fan. This means that the AI can't, for example reconstruct a frame showing Bonnie Langford and Colin Baker *unless* that video has been included in it's dataset and the AI trained to recognise the brain activity of the Doctor Who fan when (s)he sees it...

Doctor Who’s fictional sidekick

Kane

As opposed, to say, their non-fictional sidekick?

Re: Doctor Who’s fictional sidekick

Wellyboot

Multiple characters across dozens of episodes interacted with Amy so we can rule out her being a fictional sidekick within the confines of the fictional construct that is Doctor Who.

Of course if the 'Doctor' was(is?) a real person and the TV series are dramatizations of real events with characters added for effect then she could indeed be a fictional sidekick.

Are there any other ways we can twist this grammatical logic :)

Distorted

Anonymous Coward

At least brain2pix only slightly distorts the images, rather than the completely wokification of the series under the 13th doctor.

Speculative Fiction

TheProf

Sounds like

[1]Keller Machine

You have been warned!

[1] https://tardis.fandom.com/wiki/Keller_Machine

I dote on his very absence.
-- William Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice"