Nearly 70 years after America made einsteinium in its first full-scale thermo-nuke experiment, mystery element yields secrets of its chemistry
- Reference: 1612443486
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2021/02/04/einsteinium_bond_research/
- Source link:
Einsteinium (Es) has an atomic number of 99 and is buried at the bottom of the periodic table, where it joins its fellow actinides. Scientists haven’t paid much attention to the element – named after super-physicist Albert Einstein – and it has remained more of a curiosity over the past 70 or so years.
[1]
The element is difficult to study; it’s not produced naturally on Earth, and is difficult to make in a lab. Now, a team of researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Georgetown University in the US have figured out the average distance between the nuclei of bonded atoms in an einsteinium sample, a vital insight into its characteristics.
“The bond length is 2.38 angstroms,” Korey Carter, first author of the study [2]published in Nature, who is now an assistant chemistry professor at the University of Iowa, told The Register . “The bond distance is a foundational fact about an element. It tells us how something it binds to other atoms, and tells you something about its chemistry.”
[3]
It was measured by irradiating a tiny sample over 84 hours at Los Alamos. This X-ray absorption spectroscopy technique allowed the scientists to study the element’s atomic structure.
“The bond length was statistically significantly shorter than we expected, and that combined with the unexpected luminensence blue shift indicates that Es behaves differently than its predecessors in the actinide series,” Katherine Shield, co-author of the study and a PhD student at Lawrence Berkeley, told us.
What is it good for? Nobody knows yet
Now that the team has figured out its bond length, what next? Not a whole lot yet, it seems.
The scientists had less than 250 nanograms to play with. The folks at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory had to bombard a sample of curium with neutrons to form the einsteinium. The process is tricky because it normally creates californium, an element with an atomic number of 98, rather than einsteinium. “You cannot control the transmutation process,” Carter said.
Happy NukeDay to you! 70 years in the shadow of the bomb post-Trinity [4]READ MORE
Atoms of einsteinium are lost when one separates the elements to get a pure sample. At the end, you are left with a tiny amount to work with. And once the team forged that substance, they were immediately on a deadline. The isotope they produced, einsteinium-254, has a half-life of 275 days, and, in these circumstances, decays pretty much into berkelium-250. That has a three-hour half-life, and changes into californium-250.
It’s not immediately clear what einsteinium could be used for. The team would have to create more of the material to study it in detail. Carter believes it may have magnetic properties, which could lead to new types of materials. The element is also interesting for another reason: it could help chemists create elements yet to be discovered.
“Einsteinium is an ideal target for making super heavy elements with atomic numbers of 119 and beyond,” he said. The heaviest element in the periodic table so far is oganesson with an atomic number of 118. Scientists would have to bombard a large enough amount of einsteinium with neutrons to force the atom’s nucleus to grow.
“It was discovered by accident in the debris in the first hydrogen bomb,” Carter explained, referring to the 10.4MT [5]Ivy Mike test. “The US military collected the debris, and sent the samples to labs around the US in 1952, where it was later discovered at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Chemists Glynn Seaborg and Albert Ghiorso, were pioneers in radioanalytical chemistry, realized there was something new there and designed experiments to confirm [einsteinium].”
At first it was classified information, and the results weren’t published until 1955. “There was some work done with einsteinium in the 1960s and 1970s at Argonne National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, but it hasn’t really been studied since the 1970s," Carter said. "Back then, scientists only had einsteinium-253 to work with.”
Einsteinium-253 has one less neutron in its atom compared to einsteinium-254, and is even more radioactive. It has a half life of just 20 days.
[6]
“Working and doing macroscopic studies with a substance with just a 20-day half-life is really difficult," Carter said. "Thankfully, we had worked with einsteinium-254 that has a longer half-life by a factor of 10. That really changes what is possible, and means certain facilities can study it.” ®
Get our [7]Tech Resources
[1] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_science/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YBwoK8gLlOiZdjG@R8lGlgAAAIc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0
[2] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-03179-3
[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_science/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YBwoK8gLlOiZdjG@R8lGlgAAAIc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2015/07/17/trinity_nuke_test_70_years_of_the_nuclear_age/
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7vyKDcSTaE
[6] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_science/front&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YBwoK8gLlOiZdjG@R8lGlgAAAIc&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0
[7] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
The element is also interesting for another reason: it could help chemists create elements yet to be discovered.
Chemists don't make elements -- Physicists do that.
"Chemists don't make elements -- Physicists do that."
Alchemists try to, as per the Philosopher's Stone.
Chemist's do it, Pysicists just talk about it.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
“It was discovered by accident in the debris in the first hydrogen bomb”
It doesn't sound /that/ difficult to make. Just keep a safe distance amirite?
Re: “It was discovered by accident in the debris in the first hydrogen bomb”
There's a ban on testing. Could always nuke Pyongyang and get it there.
Re: “It was discovered by accident in the debris in the first hydrogen bomb”
>There's a ban on testing
There's also a small practical difficulty prosecuting somebody who has a stock of 10Mt nukes they are prepared to set off
Open YouTube
I hope there's a YouTube video that explains how you get Einsteinium from Curium by bombarding it with neutrons. Where do the 3x protons come from?
(Not a scientist ===> )
Re: Open YouTube
Beta decay: a neutron becomes a proton, emitting an electron. Carbon-14 decays to nitrogen-14 this way.
Re: Open YouTube
"Becomes."
Neutron *contains* proton and electron....
Neutron converts to energy coverts to proton and electron....
Other...
"Becomes" is such a vague word.
Re: Open YouTube
Might be a bit long for YouTube - from the CRC Handbook:
"About 3 ug of Einsteinium has been produced at Oak Ridge National Laboratories by irradiating for several years kg quantiies of Pu-239 in a reactor to produce Pu-242 ... loaded into target rods for an initial 1-year irradiation at the AEC's Savannah River Plant followed by (4 months) irradiation in a High Flux Isotopic Reactor... removed for chemical separation of the einsteinium from californium"
All that and it only lasts 270 days!
I suspect Einsteinium's most significant use will be in making up word puzzles in Chemistry Department alumni magazines.
Re: Open YouTube
I suspect Einsteinium's most significant use will be in making up word puzzles in Chemistry Department alumni magazines.
It also regularly seems to pop up on [1]Pointless , as do several of its other actinide siblings.
Used to get good low scores, but even J Random Punter now seems to have heard of it and says it...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointless
Half Life
The rate of decay reminds me of a few relationships I've had.
Re: Half Life
The rate of women leaving you is proportional to the number of women you have at the time?
Re: Half Life
> The rate of women leaving you is proportional to the number of women you have at the time?
Sure, you can experimentally verify this, but it may shorten your own full-life.
The dream of stable trans-uranics
The dream is still there, but actually has less chance of becoming a reality than FTL travel and real live Unicorns. It's useful science, but the end goal is pretty unlikely given that the more they add to the nucleus, the faster it falls apart.
Re: The dream of stable trans-uranics
It is actually a well attested fact that alicorn is the sole known source of stable trans-uranics. Sadly the current dearth of unicorns (last reported in the middle ages) has caused formal validation of the above to be significantly delayed. As soon as a new source of unicorns is found then multiple stable trans-uranics will be available for scientific identification and evaluation.
Some hypothesise that the the role of alicorn in the philosopher's stone is that of a so called 'nuclear catalyst'. We shall see.
Re: The dream of stable trans-uranics
There are a few astronomers who think they may have found some in a star somewhere where there are some unknown absorption/transmission lines but I do wonder what use the stuff might have and what the definition of 'stable' is. After all H, He and LI are quite stable but Castle Bravo proves we can modify the definition of stable. I wonder how stable a box of transuranics might actually be if hit by a random cosmic ray at just the right spot.
“You cannot control the transmutation process,” Carter said
That is LOUSY alchemy. Going on that route, they will end up ceating an abomination against God, and probably losing some body parts in the process...
On a serious note, I love stuff like this. -"We found this cool thing about a rare element" -ok, what benefit can we get from it?" -*shrugs*
They are doing sicence for the hell of it (or rather, simply to learn more about the world), not to get a quick return of investment.
Right spot.
Where's that? Just inside a covid deniers neocortex? Intriguing but difficult to ensure.
Transmutation ?
in this day and age ? That's how we ended up with covid and stuff. Haven't they learned nothing ?
Einsteinium is an ideal target for making super heavy elements with atomic numbers of 119 and beyond
So there's another chance to have Lemmium at last!