News: 1611642305

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AI clocks first-known 'binary sextuply-eclipsing sextuple star system'. Another AI will be along shortly to tell us how to pronounce that properly

(2021/01/26)


Astronomers have discovered the first-known “sextuply-eclipsing sextuple star system,” after a neural network flagged it up in data collected by NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS).

The star system, codenamed TIC 168789840, is an oddball compared to its peers. Not only does it contain six suns, they’re split into three pairs of eclipsing binary stars. That means the suns in each pair, to an observer, pass directly [1]in front of one another in their orbits. The stars in each pair are gravitationally bound to each other and to every other sun in their system, meaning each pair circles around each other, and around a common center of mass.

[2]

To get an idea of how this is structured, consider each star pair to be labeled A, B, and C. The A pair circle one another every 1.6 days, and C every 1.3 days. The A and C systems complete a full orbit as an inner quadruple system in a little under four years.

The remaining pair, B, is much further away, and is described as an outer binary. The B suns revolve around one another every 8.22 days, and it takes them about two thousand years to run a lap around the system’s common center of mass, according to a [3]paper due to appear in The Astrophysical Journal detailing these findings. If that’s all a little mind-boggling, here’s a rough sketch of the system’s structure taken from the paper:

[4]

[5]

The system's orbital mechanics ... Click to enlarge

An alien living on a hypothetical planet orbiting one of the inner quadruple stars would see four very bright suns in the sky and another two dimmer ones further away. These stars would periodically disappear, as they eclipsed one another. The chances of anyone observing this, however, are pretty slim to none as it doesn’t look like there are any exoplanets in TIC 168789840.

Finding the first sextuply-eclipsing sextuple star system with machine learning

NASA’s TESS telescope gathers a massive amount of data. Instead of manually poring over tens of millions of objects, scientists instead feed the data into machine-learning algorithms designed to highlight the most interesting examples for further examination.

Brian Powell, first author of the study and a data scientist at NASA's High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center, trained a classifier to spot eclipsing binary systems.

The neural network looks for the characteristic dip in an object’s light curve, caused when one star passes in front of the other. It assigns a score on the likelihood it's identified a eclipsing binary systems: ones rated above 0.9 on a scale up to 1.0 is considered a strong candidate.

Looking for a new hobby to kill the COVID-19 blues? Join NASA's Planet Patrol to hunt for alien worlds [6]READ MORE

The computer-vision model that performs all this is made up of a layer of approximately 5.5 million parameters, and was taught using more than 40,000 training examples on a cluster of eight Nvidia V100 GPUs for approximately two days.

At first, TIC 168789840 didn’t seem so odd. “The neural network was trained to look for the feature of the eclipse in the light curve with no concern as to periodicity,” Powell told The Register .

"Therefore, to the neural net, an eclipsing binary is no different than an eclipsing sextuple, both of them would likely have an output near 1.0."

Upon closer inspection, however, the scientists were shocked when they realized they had discovered the first-known triplet eclipsing binary system. Each star locked in their pairs are very similar to one another in terms of mass, radius, and temperature.

“The fact that all three binaries show eclipses allows us to determine the radii and relative temperatures of each star. This, together with measurement of the radial velocities, allows us to determine the masses of the stars. Having this much information on a multiple star system of this order is quite rare,” Powell added.

[7]

There are 17 or so known sextuple star systems, though TIC 168789840 is the first structure where the sextuple suns are also binary eclipsing stars. Scientists hope that studying all its structural and physical properties will unlock mysteries of how multiple star systems are born. ®

Get our [8]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.eso.org/public/videos/eso1311b/

[2] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_emergent_tech/artificial_intelligence&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=2&c=2YA-2R-ZDnBJN816LIeSCLgAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D2%26raptor%3Dcondor%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[3] https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03433

[4] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_emergent_tech/artificial_intelligence&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=3&c=33YA-2R-ZDnBJN816LIeSCLgAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[5] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/01/26/stars.jpg

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2020/10/01/nasa_crowdsource_exoplanet/

[7] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_emergent_tech/artificial_intelligence&sz=300x50%7C300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251%7C300x252%7C300x600%7C300x601&tile=4&c=44YA-2R-ZDnBJN816LIeSCLgAAAIw&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[8] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

it doesn’t look like there are any exoplanets in TIC 168789840

Neil Barnes

Shame, really - the tides would be amazing, along with the sunsets.

Re: it doesn’t look like there are any exoplanets in TIC 168789840

KittenHuffer

With the stars orbiting each other on a timescale of days they will not be very far apart. Consider that Mercury has an orbit of 88 days. This means that there are no stable orbits for planets around any single star in the system.

The closer two sets of binaries are orbiting at roughly twice the distance of Mars (or roughly a third of the distance of Jupiter) which would almost certainly exclude a stable orbit around either of those binary pairs.

The only possibility of a stable orbit would be around the 'outer' binary pair. But even there the 8 day orbit of the stars puts them further apart, so a planet would have to be waaaaaaay out to minimum the 'bumpiness' of the changing gravity as the stars orbit. So well past the frost line, and waaaaaaaay beyond the sort of orbit where the tides would be significant. And even well beyond the range at which the suns would just be really bright stars.

I agree that it would be amazing, unfortunately just very unlikely.

Re: it doesn’t look like there are any exoplanets in TIC 168789840

Neil Barnes

I suspect also that any putative planet would probably be wandering in and out of various Roche limits too... nice sunset, shame the planet just pulled itself to bits.

Re: nice sunset, shame the planet just pulled itself to bits.

Anonymous Coward

Well, I'm sure all the extra dust and rocks just adds to the dramatic effect...

.

... if only there was somewhere to sit and watch :-)

Re: nice sunset, shame the planet just pulled itself to bits.

Doctor Syntax

But just think of working out when to put the clocks back & forward.

Anonymous Coward

That means the suns in each pair, to an observer, pass directly in front of one another in their orbits. Depending on where the observer is! ;-)

Might there be similar systems we can't spot because we see them from far enough above/below to not see the eclipsing and hence the periodic dimming?

Chris Miller

Thousands of them. The odds that a pair of stars circling in a randomly aligned orbit will appear to eclipse when viewed from Earth is over 1,000:1 (much the same is true for detecting planets in this way). It's not really known whether there's any tendency for the orbits of widely separated stars to align (say, with the plane of the galaxy), which might improve the odds somewhat.

KittenHuffer

The plane of a system is determined by the initial collapse of the gas cloud that becomes the star. (IIRC it's determined by the shortest axis of the gas cloud, though I may have misremembered) And the plane of the galaxy has no significant influence on this. So the plane of a stellar system is effectively random in comparison to the plane of the galaxy.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/08/30/our-motion-through-space-isnt-a-vortex-but-something-far-more-interesting/

About half way down is an accurate animation of how the inner solar system is moving as it circles the galaxy. This shows that our solar system is not travelling edge on.

I believe the 'random' arrangement of planes is supported by the results from Kepler, in that Kepler detected planets in a percentage of the systems observed that was consistent with the planes being arranged randomly. If systems had a tendency to align with the galactic plane then there would have been a far higher percentage of systems in which planets were detected.

(((3xbody)++)++)++

hammarbtyp

And I thought the 3 body problem was hard

Re: (((3xbody)++)++)++

Loyal Commenter

It is, unless those bodies are far enough apart, that you can consider each separately as a two body system, and each is orbiting the centre of mass of each of the others, in much the same way that the Earth and Moon orbit the Sun together, and you don't have to worry too much about the separate effects of the Sun's gravity on each.

teebie

How would there be a binary system that wasn't a binary eclipsing system? Surely one star is always eclipsing the other from a certain viewpoint.

KittenHuffer

It's cos we're being Terranist, and only counting those that eclipse from our point of view!

<dark> "Let's form the Linux Standard Linux Standardization Association
Board. The purpose of this board will be to standardize Linux
Standardization Organizations."