News: 1610402612

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Parler games: Social network for internet rejects sues Amazon Web Services for pulling plug on hosting

(2021/01/11)


Parler, which advertised itself as a place where you can "speak freely and express yourself openly, without fear of being 'deplatformed' for your views," sued Amazon Web Services (AWS) on Monday for deplatforming the site.

On Saturday, AWS suspended Parler's account, based on the social network's role as a medium through which last week's [1]attempted pro-Trump insurrection at the US Capitol was coordinated. In a [2]letter to Parler, AWS said it could not provide service to a company unable to identify and remove content that incites violence. Because AWS provided Parler's hosting infrastructure, Parler – a haven primarily for far-right netizens banned or ostracized from other platforms – went offline and remains unavailable.

[3]

AWS's suspension, which took effect at 23:59 PST (07:59 UTC) on Sunday, followed Apple's removal of Parler's iOS client app from the App Store and Google's [4]removal of Parler's Android client app from Google Play on Friday.

In its complaint, filed in a US district court in Seattle, Washington, Parler points out that on Friday, one of the top trending tweets was "Hang Mike Pence," but AWS has made no effort to suspend Twitter's hosting account.

"AWS’s decision to effectively terminate Parler’s account is apparently motivated by political animus," the complaint contends. "It is also apparently designed to reduce competition in the microblogging services market to the benefit of Twitter."

Twitter on Saturday [5]did remove those tweets; Parler's inability or unwillingness to remove such content is the reason cited by Amazon, Apple, and Google for banning the social media service.

Social network Parler dumped by AWS, says it prepared for this by only using bare metal [6]READ MORE

The [7]lawsuit [PDF] claims AWS, in conjunction with Twitter, has violated the Sherman Antitrust Act and has separately violated its contract by failing to provide a 30-day notice before terminating service.

AWS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The [8]AWS Customer Agreement states that the web giant may terminate service immediately if a client's or client's customer's usage of its service poses a security risk, could adversely impact its services or other customers services, could subject AWS to liability, or could be fraudulent. The [9]AWS Terms of Service allow the company to suspend service if [10]Prohibited Content is not removed within two business days.

Websites that support hate speech have weathered similar abandonment in the past. Gab, another social network known for courting extremists, was booted off GoDaddy in 2018 and now runs its own servers. Neo-nazi site The Daily Stormer, after being [11]booted from Cloudflare in 2017, has had to change web hosts several times and currently relies on an .su domain overseen by a Russian registrar.

Parler is seeking a temporary restraining order to undo the shutdown, noting in its lawsuit that efforts to arrange alternative hosting have failed. "Doing so is the equivalent of pulling the plug on a hospital patient on life support," the company says in its complaint. "It will kill Parler’s business - at the very time it is set to skyrocket."

In December, CNN [12]reported that Parler usage had declined to 2.3m daily active users from a peak of 2.9m around the time of the 2020 election in November. The company's court filing anticipates more signups thanks to Twitter's [13]ban of President Trump.

In [14]a Sunday interview on Fox News, John Matze, CEO of the Nevada-based outfit, did not sound optimistic about reviving its relationship with AWS. "At this point, we may even have to go as far as buying and building our own data centers and buying up our own servers to get back on the internet."

The ban, he said, would harm the company's business and its ability to raise capital. "This is really, really devastating what they did," he said.

For what it's worth, the speech and videos posted to Parler – including [15]threats and conspiracy theories – continue to be freely available, thanks to the archiving efforts of security researchers. ®

[16]

No, Parler was not hacked

A viral and now-deleted Reddit [17]post that on Sunday claimed Parler had been hacked, and that users' private messages and other personal info had been harvested for public leaking, is basically not true.

Said post was written by someone who claimed to have heard from a friend with "technical" skills who explained how Parler had been broken into, and the prose used a garbled mix of IT terms, from Twilio APIs being abused to magic SETI-like Docker containers. It had a whole "my uncle works for Nintendo" vibe to it. The post, for instance, referenced a Twilio press release that "accidentally" spilled the beans on Parler's security, but no such press release exists.

As what appears to be the lead hacktivist [18]archiving Parler’s public contents [19]explained today, all that’s going on is common-or-garden scraping of publicly available posts – or what was available until AWS pulled the plug on Parler's hosting on Sunday night. The process of scraping the site was containerized, and a Dockerfile shared, for anyone who wanted to grab a copy of the 70TB-odd of hosted data for themselves.

It was discovered that it's trivial to enumerate public posts, videos, and images shared on Parler, allowing them to be downloaded en masse. That’s it. There was no collection of Parler users’ private messages, credit card details, or government-issued photo IDs. (Netizens can submit their IDs to Parler to verify their identities and gain so-called Parler citizen status.) Those gleefully looking forward to the leaking of private information, doxxing of Parler users, and targeting of employers and family members, should remember that this sort of unauthorized disclosure is illegal in most Western jurisdictions.

In a [20]statement on Monday, Twilio said it had told Parler on Friday it was withdrawing its multi-factor authentication services from the social network due to a breach of its terms and conditions. Parler had, we're told, preemptively stopped using Twilio's APIs before that plug was pulled.

As for the now-scraped pictures and videos posted publicly by Parler users, well, if they uploaded files with identifying metadata and geographic co-ordinates embedded, more fool them. It appears Parler did not strip this information from uploaded files.

Additional reporting by Gareth Corfield

Get our [21]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/06/us_congress_trump_stormed/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/11/aws_parler_ban/

[3] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_datacentre/cloud&sz=300x250%7C300x252%7C300x600&tile=3&c=33X-zYhecV5fTwoatSIwQ0OgAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D3%26raptor%3Deagle%26pos%3Dtop%26test%3D0

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/09/twitter_deletes_trump_tweets/

[5] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/10/hang-mike-pence-twitter-stops-phrase-trending-capitol-breach

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/11/aws_parler_ban/

[7] https://regmedia.co.uk/2021/01/11/parler_v_aws.pdf

[8] https://aws.amazon.com/agreement/

[9] https://aws.amazon.com/service-terms/

[10] https://aws.amazon.com/aup/

[11] https://www.theregister.com/2017/08/16/cloudflare_ceo_daily_stormer/

[12] https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/10/tech/parler-downloads/index.html

[13] https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/09/twitter_deletes_trump_tweets/

[14] https://youtu.be/_6weryikO5o?t=621

[15] https://www.adl.org/blog/parler-users-prepare-for-site-shutdown-with-conspiracy-theories-threats

[16] https://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/jump?co=1&iu=/6978/reg_datacentre/cloud&sz=300x100%7C300x250%7C300x251&tile=4&c=44X-zYhecV5fTwoatSIwQ0OgAAAFg&t=ct%3Dns%26unitnum%3D4%26raptor%3Dfalcon%26pos%3Dmid%26test%3D0

[17] https://www.reddit.com/r/ParlerWatch/comments/kuqvs3/all_parler_user_data_is_being_downloaded_as_we/giu04o6/

[18] https://twitter.com/donk_enby/status/1348281459031814146

[19] https://twitter.com/donk_enby/status/1348666166978424832

[20] https://twitter.com/twilio/status/1348719143172927491/photo/1

[21] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

Thank god

Anonymous Coward

Only four years too late for all this to kick off, should have been done long ago.

Re: Thank god

Anonymous Coward

Okta ditched them, Apple ditched them, Google ditched them, I’m guessing Microsoft said no as they are talking about buying hardware and data centres. That’s going to take months and months to build...Good luck with that.

Re: Thank god

Anonymous Coward

Strangely, Parler claimed that they worked on "the bare metal" so it would take mere hours to start up again with another host. The fact that doesn't seem to be happening suggest their press releases contain as much truth as the messages they host.

Worrying times

Anonymous Coward

I, for one, am deeply concerned that this much power and political partisanship has coalesced around such a small number of tech companies. Many of the internet's pioneers will feel similarly, I'm sure.

cornetman

Regardless of whether or not speech that is considered reprehensible or even illegal in some jurisdictions appears on the Parler site, I find the unrestrained glee that many express at the demise of Parler uncomfortable myself.

Parler was started as a response to the de-platforming of speakers elsewhere such as Twitter, and as a concept it would seem to me that any site promoting free discussion would be something that particularly Americans would defend to the death. Apparently free speech as a concept is only acceptable when the speech is socially approved according to the current zeitgeist.

Certainly if Parler were slow to kill off speech that is alleged to be illegal, then they only have themselves to blame. Having said that, I am pretty much a free-speech absolutist. Excepting false-witness and "speech" facilitating fraud, I don't believe any speech should be illegal; and I'm not absolutely sure about the fraud exception.

There are social ills that can be traced to the "abuse" of free speech. However, the suppression of free speech, from anyone, is the greater evil. Without free speech, we have no freedom whatsoever.

Disgraceful

Anonymous Coward

The right to free speech ingrained in the US constitution is being selectively overruled by private interests who dislike what some people have to say. There are times when inciting armed insurrection and secession are MORALLY RIGHT ACTION, that is how the nation was founded and why the right to bear arms is in the constitution. The illegal violators here are the tech platforms censoring free speech. To have the legal status of a platform, they should not be censoring user content.

Re: Disgraceful

Anonymous Coward

"Anonymous coward". Never have two words been so appropriate together. You think that violent action is necessary to support your BS conspiracy theories yet you're too pitiful to risk being shunned by those around you.

Anonymous Coward

Something these right-wing morons don't seem to understand is that if they get their own way and the idiot-in-chief makes tech giants legally liable for the content on their platforms....then Amazon would have had to pull the plug anyway as they would have become legally liable for the hate speech they hosted.

Conceptual integrity in turn dictates that the design must proceed
from one mind, or from a very small number of agreeing resonant minds.
-- Frederick Brooks Jr., "The Mythical Man Month"