Apple aptly calls its wireless over-the-ear headphones the AirPods Max – as in, maximum damage to your wallet
- Reference: 1607468588
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/12/08/airpods_max_apple/
- Source link:
The cans faithfully follow Apple's playbook. Like the bog-standard AirPod they are intrinsically linked to the iOS ecosystem, limiting their usefulness beyond Cupertino's kit. They look nice, although beauty is very much in the eye of the beholder. And, true to form for Apple, they’re subject to the Cupertino loyalty tax, retailing at £549 in the UK, or $549 in the US.
This [1]launch isn’t much of a surprise. Apple has long demonstrated a desire to enter the premium audio space. Its first real foray was in 2014, when it [2]acquired Beats Electronics , the headphones company founded by rapper Dr Dre and legendary record exec Jimmy Iovine. It followed-up in 2016 with AirPods, which need no introduction.
[3]
Max Payin' ... the Airpods Max. Source: Apple
But AirPods Max is an entirely different kettle of fish. Whereas Beats and AirPods have always been relatively attainable, this latest effort is priced beyond what most would countenance spending on a pair headphones. It vastly exceeds the asking-price demanded by other well-regarded cans, like Sony’s WH-1000XM4 and Bose’s QC35 II.
To point out how dear these are, for the same amount of money, you can buy two pairs of Bose’s QC35 IIs, and still have enough money left over for a pair of bog-standard second-generation AirPods. For an extra £150, you can get your hands on the entry-level Mac mini. They’re almost as expensive as a computer.
Still, there’s no doubt Apple will manage to shift a fair few units. It is, after all, a luxury goods company. The same forces that prompt people to spend £500 on a pair of Balenciaga jeans are the same ones that will drive sales for the AirPods Max.
So what do you get for that?
Functionality wise, there’s a lot of overlap between these and other premium headphones, including a Transparency Mode, which allows the user to simultaneously listen to music while being able to listen to their surroundings, as well as active noise cancellation (ANC).
Battery life is fingered at 20-hours, which is solid though hardly groundbreaking. The similarly-excellent Jabra Elite 85h headphones promises around 30-hours with ANC switched on.
Bad apples: US customs seize OnePlus earbuds thinking they're knock-off AirPods [4]READ MORE
One feature touted by Apple, dubbed Spatial Audio, promises a more “theatrelike” experience when listening to audio recorded in 5.1, 7.1, and Dolby Atmos. It uses the accelerometer and gyroscope present in the headphones, as well as the user’s phone, to discern the position of their head. As they move around the environment, the audio mimics the effect of turning to face a different speaker in a surround-sound setup.
Meanwhile Adaptive EQ, which appeared on previous AirPod devices, automatically adjusts low and mid-range frequencies based on the shape of the wearer’s ear.
As perhaps expected, the AirPods Max uses Cupertino's proprietary pairing tech, which allows punters connect devices with a tap and switch cans between other Apple-made kit registered to their iCloud account.
This, however, means it won’t work with Android or Windows devices. It also won’t play nice with older iDevices and Macs, as it requires MacOS Big Sur and iOS/iPad OS 14.3 or later as a bare minimum.
If you’ve got money to burn, you can pre-order the AirPods Max now, with units expected to land as early as December 15. ®
Get our [5]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.apple.com/uk/airpods-max/specs/
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2014/05/28/apple_makes_it_official_3_beeelion_for_beats/
[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/12/08/airpod.jpg
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/14/us_customs_earpods/
[5] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
I know I shouldn't. I know its wrong.
But when I see someone, perhaps in my office or on the train (so, err, not soon...) wearing these, I'm going to think:
What a moron. $900 for Bluetooth headphones.
This is exactly the opposite effect that the purchaser was aiming for.
I have a pair of Kenwood semi open cans that are about 25 years old.
I won't be changing them just yet.
25 years ago those were probably still made in japan and not china. I bet they sound amazing, and obviously of high quality construction since they lasted so long. unlike junk made in china "planned obsolesces"
How about
No....
Whilst I'll admit the moving head to face the sound source is a neat trick, it's one I'll happily do without since my Sony Wh-h800's do wireless so very well (quick pairing, backup cord if needed, repairable if needed, works with windows, mac and android, has an app to tune the sound to your hearing, generally lasts about a week before I have to charge them on using them at least 4 - 5 hours a day) and with the change I can buy a set highend hifi cans for home listening (say to a record player using decidedly non-wireless tech).. Or buy a phono to usb sound card...
And still have change for a new record deck....
$550!! an apple sucker is born every minute.
And who wants to take a guess as to how much these cost Apple to produce in BoM terms?
$30? $40?
Yeah yeah, "cost of research and design", shipping, overheads, etc etc. But I think even the most rabid fanboy would struggle to argue that these aren't a complete piss-take by Apple.
You forgot to mention
They only work with iEarrings available from $149 per pair and up depending on your choice of metal.
Apple is also in the process of expanding Genius Bars to include iHaircuts for those who are wearing their hair wrong.
I feel more and more like a complete wanker for buying into the Apple product offerings, as each year passes.
The real embarrassment for me, is whenever I visit the CrApp Store, I am left thinking what the fuck is the point of this smart phone
I'm happy to say that the last (and only) time I ever gave apple any money was when I bought my Apple ][
Apple are the gypsies of our time
Actually, I feel even this is too insulting to gypsies
Case looks like a bra
Someone has posted this on twitter..
"sorry apple, but the airpods max case looks weirdly like a bra"
[1]https://twitter.com/katiecollins/status/1336306194508603393
[1] https://twitter.com/katiecollins/status/1336306194508603393
Re: Case looks like a bra
That is indeed funny.
Jean Paul Gaultier
Could produce a case for these headphones inspired by the Cone Bra he designed for Madonna.
Re: Case looks like a bra
Maybe because you'd have to be a bit of a tit to shell out for these when there's better value offerings from proper audio equipment companies?
For Australia, it'll be [1]AU$899.00 .
[1] https://www.apple.com/au/airpods-max/